|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,971
Boobie Vision 2000 Toyota Celica
|
|
Boobie Vision
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,971 |
^^^ ooh yeah now I remember what that is. Someone on here made a post about it. Yeah i know what you mean now. thx man!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
The dyno on n e w c e l i c a . o r g comparing injen/aem/tpr shows injen beating aem but quite a bit in the top end and ct's didnt. Dynos suck  dynos differ...the CONSISTENCY i wanted to show was that every dyno (even INJEN's official dyno) showed a loss of power down low... dynos done properly don't suck and are far better measures than "oooh this FEELS faster"...or "Hey! i got the newest G-tech!"...  True. It does lose power down low but what the dynos didnt conclusively show is whether the top end for the injen is a lot better than aem or not even really all that better. Of coarse it is better than just riding in the car but they still didnt show very much consistency considering one dyno comparing aem and injen shows injen beating it by quite a bit in the top end and the other shows aem keeping up. I have no idea why I just said all this since its common sense and been said but o well.
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE
BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
The dyno on n e w c e l i c a . o r g comparing injen/aem/tpr shows injen beating aem but quite a bit in the top end and ct's didnt. Dynos suck dynos differ...the CONSISTENCY i wanted to show was that every dyno (even INJEN's official dyno) showed a loss of power down low... dynos done properly don't suck and are far better measures than "oooh this FEELS faster"...or "Hey! i got the newest G-tech!"... I have no idea why I just said all this since its common sense and been said but o well. i have no idea either but seriously...injen seems to top aem by either a silght or significant margin. i have only seen 3 dynos that match these two intakes together...one is the one i posted, the other is by TPR, and the other is by AEM. since the last two were from comapanies i posted the one that was an "independent"...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
well i like my intake
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 795
The O 2005 Scion TC
|
|
The O
2005 Scion TC
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 795 |
it's going to ship end of february by air  i got dibs on your VS kit if at all you are getting rid of it I dont think hes gunna bro ^^I'm sure you've been asked already but what are you going to do with your old kit? prob keep it for back up i mean, i don't have my stock pieces at all and this kit isn't worth to sell, it's really 2 beat 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
yea he pmed me bout it and i told him.
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,226
Specialist
|
|
Specialist
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,226 |
Hey Billy, good choice on the CAI.
Don't get caught up in the CAI hype or all the hype.
They are all the same when it boils down. No one in they're right mind is going to feel a difference of a 2,4,5,1 WHP any where throughout the power band of the Celica's engine or any real gain anywhere.
With the Injen or any CAI, who is going to expect or want power from or below 3,000 or 3,500 RPM's from a Celica engine and with a CAI? Who cares! It's pointless basically and the CAI is just to say I have something under my hood and it sounds great.
I'm not losing sleep on it and I hope other people are happy also.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
Hey Billy, good choice on the CAI.
Don't get caught up in the CAI hype or all the hype.
They are all the same when it boils down. No one in they're right mind is going to feel a difference of a 2,4,5,1 WHP any where throughout the power band of the Celica's engine or any real gain anywhere.
With the Injen or any CAI, who is going to expect or want power from or below 3,000 or 3,500 RPM's from a Celica engine and with a CAI? Who cares! It's pointless basically and the CAI is just to say I have something under my hood and it sounds great.
I'm not losing sleep on it and I hope other people are happy also. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
ct won't stop for everyone who likes injen i agree though, most of the time, it's a drivers race with similar mods...as for down low, everyone wants low end though.
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urgent
by SoloXKay - Mar 19, 2024 11:58am
|
|
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|
