|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 97
Member 2004 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2004 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 97 |
I hate to say it but it feels to me like the braking of my stock 04 w/drums in the back simply sucks donkey balls.
All I can say is "spongy". I step on the pedal, I don't get "stopping power" I get "mush" if you catch my drift. Will rear rotors fix this? I'm sorry, but the 2000 Cougar I just got rid of had discs all the way around (weight>3000 lbs) and stopped way, and I mean way better than my Celi does.
Would it be more improvement I'm sure to go with rotors in the rear before going with larer rotors in the front? Cross drilled and slotted is mostly for heat dissapation rather than power, correct?
Anyone have a ballpark on what ditching my drums in the back is going to run me? Which would be cheaper vs. improvement, larger front rotors or adding rears? TIA for the advice guys!
~ 2004 Silver GT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 138
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 138 |
Its at least a thousand maybe more to change the rears to discs since you gotta buy and install a bunch of equipment. Just get a big brake kit for the front from trd.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 923 Likes: 1
ECelica Staff 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
ECelica Staff
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 923 Likes: 1 |
How many miles you got on the car? You may just need to get a brake job done. A rear disc brake conversion is costly and will not really give better braking. More fer looks IMO.
"They don't make no seatbelt for the mind. So I can't buckle up for this ride!"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
in my opinion, a big brake kit for your front will be cheaper than replacing your rears to rotors (name brand big brake kits from the likes of aem cost about 4k..but some lesser brands offer them for about 1k) slotted & drilled discs significantly lessen your stopping distance. it does have a heat dissapation advantage, but being drilled makes the discs more textured (obviously) and this texture allows for improved grip from your pads...so it does have some sort of 'power' advantage if you want to call it that. (the brakes don't grip more powerfully, they just grip better).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
How many miles you got on the car? You may just need to get a brake job done. A rear disc brake conversion is costly and will not really give better braking. More fer looks IMO. he has an '04 celica so i doubt the pads are his problem (although they may be if he abuses his brakes badly)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
slotted/drilled rotors make the car have less stopping power, Caleb.
The decreased surface area means less contact with the pad, and thus more stopping ditance.
However, over long, hard, repeated stops, these slots/drills will allow the gasses to escape from under the pad, lessening the affect of brake fade.
On a Celica, unless you autox, the upgraded rotors are just for looks.
What you need on your 2004 GT are some decent pads/shoes.
buy a new set of rotors ($44 is worth not having rust) and some good pads. TRD, EBC, Hawk.
As for the shoes, not many companies make high Performance shoes, but you can do better than OEM.
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
^^ wasnt aware of that, thanks for the headsup jameson i always learned it was a friction thing. the holes acted the same as bumps would and that created more 'grip' (and friction) which stopped the car in shorter distances.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
^^ wasnt aware of that, thanks for the headsup jameson i always learned it was a friction thing. the holes acted the same as bumps would and that created more 'grip' (and friction) which stopped the car in shorter distances. Thats what it would seem like, but actually it means less surface srea. Sure, they are great when you ride the breaks for a long time, and you get serious fade, but most people never do that
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,061
Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,061 |
best way= Rear disk conversion, and then upgrading to Brembo (NOT AEM!!) big brakes... 13 something inches up front, 11 something inches in back, 6 piston front calipers, 4 fiston rear calipers That would be an awesome brake setup (and the same one that my car will have when i make my first million )
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 35
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 35 |
have you had recent work on your brakes..? because by the way you are describing the "spongy" feeling that usually means there is air or water in you brake lines and you need to get em bled...
thats just from what i know about cars...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 558
Senior Member 00 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
00 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 558 |
best way= Rear disk conversion, and then upgrading to Brembo (NOT AEM!!) big brakes... 13 something inches up front, 11 something inches in back, 6 piston front calipers, 4 fiston rear calipers That would be an awesome brake setup (and the same one that my car will have when i make my first million ) yep, BREMBO is the best stop stuff out there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 97
Member 2004 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2004 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 97 |
Wow, thanks tons for all the replies everyone.
I realize no one knows my situation, but $1,000 to fix what I'm not liking about these brakes is plenty affordable.
Car has just about 2,000 miles on it and I've only owned it... hell, not even a month yet. And of course I've had no work done on the brakes.
So rear rotors isn't the golden key then? Most reasonable sounding advice I heard was to replace the front rotors/pads and redo the back shoes.
Would steel brake lines help? Is it noticeable enough to be worth doing on top of what I'm going to do anyway?
Last edited by 2K4Celica; Apr 20, 2004 11:31am.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 222
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 222 |
Brake lines would get better response and you could probably get rid of some of that spongy feeling with them.
|
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|