|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 58
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 58 |
hey people i have a question. i saw the RX8 and i really like it. what do you guys think. can you give me some pros and cons
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
its nice, get it, but if you do make sure its the 6 speed. pretty quick, it will beat a gts. if though its a sedan it still a sports car =) they are comfy and nice to drive. doesnt cost a whole lot, but if speed is what your looking for an sti or evo would be better. cons would be bck seats are small and its a pain in the ass to take your car to get worked on cause it has a rotary engine, even mazda doesnt know what they are doing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,029 Likes: 1
Masta OC 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Masta OC
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,029 Likes: 1 |
It's not a bad car... but it's no faster really than the 6-speed GTS. Plus, it costs as much as a real sports car. I much rather have a 6-speed GTS or a RSX-s if you REALLY need 4 seats.
I'm just a crosshair I'm just a shot away from you
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,283
Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,283 |
The engine is made by Ford, which I don't think will be all that reliable. It looks ok, but I wouldn't want to spend 29,000 on it. I would much rather get a RX7, even though it's older. You can get a much better car if your into speed or style, by getting an Evo or STi. I think the Sti engine will last the longest out of the 3. It is entirely your call. If you like the car then get it, but if you're unsure then don't get it yet, wait 2 or 3 weeks and then ask yourself if you really want that car, if you still can't decide then you must not want it all that bad.
My car is gunna be 10x faster than yours...haha... I'm gunna buy like 10 of those speedchips! I figure if 1 gets me 20hp then 10 will get me 200hp!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,667
ECelica Staff
|
ECelica Staff
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,667 |
I love how smooth the engine was ... 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,029 Likes: 1
Masta OC 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Masta OC
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,029 Likes: 1 |
The engine is made by Ford, which I don't think will be all that reliable. It looks ok, but I wouldn't want to spend 29,000 on it. I would much rather get a RX7, even though it's older. You can get a much better car if your into speed or style, by getting an Evo or STi. I think the Sti engine will last the longest out of the 3. It is entirely your call. If you like the car then get it, but if you're unsure then don't get it yet, wait 2 or 3 weeks and then ask yourself if you really want that car, if you still can't decide then you must not want it all that bad. Mazda being associated with Ford does NOT mean that it's "made by Ford". Did you know Yamaha made engines for the Taurus before... and made our engines too? Uh oh. Our engines are made by Ford!
I'm just a crosshair I'm just a shot away from you
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,029 Likes: 1
Masta OC 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Masta OC
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,029 Likes: 1 |
I love how smooth the engine was ...  That is one thing rotary engines rock with. They actually have to put a warning sound on the tach when you get near redline, because you can't even tell by the sound of the engine (at 9k!).
I'm just a crosshair I'm just a shot away from you
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973
hookah-meister 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
hookah-meister
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973 |
The engine is made by Ford, which I don't think will be all that reliable. It looks ok, but I wouldn't want to spend 29,000 on it. I would much rather get a RX7, even though it's older. You can get a much better car if your into speed or style, by getting an Evo or STi. I think the Sti engine will last the longest out of the 3. It is entirely your call. If you like the car then get it, but if you're unsure then don't get it yet, wait 2 or 3 weeks and then ask yourself if you really want that car, if you still can't decide then you must not want it all that bad. Ford did not make the engine. Last time I checked, they never made rotary engines for production cars. And don't give me "oh but mazda is owned by ford...therefore ford this...ford that." 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1 |
The engine is made by Ford, which I don't think will be all that reliable. It looks ok, but I wouldn't want to spend 29,000 on it. I would much rather get a RX7, even though it's older. You can get a much better car if your into speed or style, by getting an Evo or STi. I think the Sti engine will last the longest out of the 3. It is entirely your call. If you like the car then get it, but if you're unsure then don't get it yet, wait 2 or 3 weeks and then ask yourself if you really want that car, if you still can't decide then you must not want it all that bad. Mazda being associated with Ford does NOT mean that it's "made by Ford". Did you know Yamaha made engines for the Taurus before... and made our engines too? Uh oh. Our engines are made by Ford! no wonder the lift bolts always break  u put it nicely revmonster, now i believe celica has ford parts on it. gotta go make sure if it really has some.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
rx8s are faster then gts. the drive is smooth because they took power away from it to give it a smoother ride so your head doesnt jerk. you can hear when the car is in higher rpms the beep is just a safty feature, and quite annoying. when i first got my rx7 i thought people were honking at me
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
mazda has made engines for the some of the ford probes, if you pop the hood on some, its says mazda on the block
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973
hookah-meister 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
hookah-meister
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973 |
my old capri had a mazda engine in it. I think they put the 323 engine in my 91 Capri convertible.
But I love the rotary engines and their designs. Wish the RX-8 had a lil more "umf" to it when you gun it, but it's smooth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,667
ECelica Staff
|
ECelica Staff
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,667 |
 audible shift light
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 583
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 583 |
i love it.. debating the pros and cons of selling the celi and getting it.. but i like not having a car payment...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
maybe mazda speed will make a Turbo for it. a mazda salesman told me however the FD being twinturboed lost a lot of sales because people werent able to afford the insurrance
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973
hookah-meister 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
hookah-meister
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973 |
they actually have a Turbo for it already, it just can't make it to the states. I know Acosta Motorsports is working on (or maybe finished) a Turbo kit for the 8.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
that will be sweet, i cant wait to see some dyno's and times for it
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 58
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 58 |
ok guys thanks for the info but what about speed wise? i have a sprtsshift gts (sucks) should i get a 6 speed RX* or 6 speed GTS. tell me And when it comes to adding under the hood would it be difficuly because of the rotary engine. Uh yes the the Rx8 starts at 25000 not 29. good deal. it had 237 horses out of stock. i just want 2 make sure that im trading in my gorgeous looking car for a hotter 1. its like cheating on ur women you dont wanna chest on her with someone less attractive. lol
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973
hookah-meister 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
hookah-meister
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973 |
browse through www.rx8club.com [ rx8club.com] and find out.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,619
Specialist
|
Specialist
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,619 |
mazda has made engines for the some of the ford probes, if you pop the hood on some, its says mazda on the block My dads '03 ranger has a mazda engine...mmm...american japanese stuff!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,029 Likes: 1
Masta OC 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Masta OC
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,029 Likes: 1 |
ok guys thanks for the info but what about speed wise? i have a sprtsshift gts (sucks) should i get a 6 speed RX* or 6 speed GTS. tell me And when it comes to adding under the hood would it be difficuly because of the rotary engine. Uh yes the the Rx8 starts at 25000 not 29. good deal. it had 237 horses out of stock. i just want 2 make sure that im trading in my gorgeous looking car for a hotter 1. its like cheating on ur women you dont wanna chest on her with someone less attractive. lol You will NEVER find a 6-speed RX-8 for under $30k. I looked. High 29's and you'd be lucky. The track times, thus far, are almost the same between the 8 and the GTS. I'd feel much more comfortable modding an engine that people actually know how to repair. If you screw something up and don't know how to fix it yourself on the 8... goodluck. Also, Mazda isn't going to release a factory Turbo or supercharger for the car. The Mazdaspeed version is only going to have better suspension and looks.
I'm just a crosshair I'm just a shot away from you
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,283
Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,283 |
The engine is made by Ford, which I don't think will be all that reliable. It looks ok, but I wouldn't want to spend 29,000 on it. I would much rather get a RX7, even though it's older. You can get a much better car if your into speed or style, by getting an Evo or STi. I think the Sti engine will last the longest out of the 3. It is entirely your call. If you like the car then get it, but if you're unsure then don't get it yet, wait 2 or 3 weeks and then ask yourself if you really want that car, if you still can't decide then you must not want it all that bad. Ford did not make the engine. Last time I checked, they never made rotary engines for production cars. And don't give me "oh but mazda is owned by ford...therefore ford this...ford that."  I didn't say that because Ford owns Mazda. I always heard that Ford made the engine for the RX8. Why cratisize someone, before you know why something was said?
My car is gunna be 10x faster than yours...haha... I'm gunna buy like 10 of those speedchips! I figure if 1 gets me 20hp then 10 will get me 200hp!
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
one word-"slow" i saw them at the drags 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973
hookah-meister 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
hookah-meister
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973 |
The engine is made by Ford, which I don't think will be all that reliable. It looks ok, but I wouldn't want to spend 29,000 on it. I would much rather get a RX7, even though it's older. You can get a much better car if your into speed or style, by getting an Evo or STi. I think the Sti engine will last the longest out of the 3. It is entirely your call. If you like the car then get it, but if you're unsure then don't get it yet, wait 2 or 3 weeks and then ask yourself if you really want that car, if you still can't decide then you must not want it all that bad. Ford did not make the engine. Last time I checked, they never made rotary engines for production cars. And don't give me "oh but mazda is owned by ford...therefore ford this...ford that."  I didn't say that because Ford owns Mazda. I always heard that Ford made the engine for the RX8. Why cratisize someone, before you know why something was said? You believe everything you hear?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 58
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 58 |
ok i guess im getting a negative response from the Rx8 by a show of hands who will go 4 an Rx8 or a gts?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
yes they are safe to mod, rotary engines respond very well to exhaust mods. rear wheel drive so it would make a better drag car then the celi. they start off at 25k for the automatic version, it has like 30 something less horsepower. the 6 speeds are 28-29k
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,283
Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,283 |
The engine is made by Ford, which I don't think will be all that reliable. It looks ok, but I wouldn't want to spend 29,000 on it. I would much rather get a RX7, even though it's older. You can get a much better car if your into speed or style, by getting an Evo or STi. I think the Sti engine will last the longest out of the 3. It is entirely your call. If you like the car then get it, but if you're unsure then don't get it yet, wait 2 or 3 weeks and then ask yourself if you really want that car, if you still can't decide then you must not want it all that bad. Ford did not make the engine. Last time I checked, they never made rotary engines for production cars. And don't give me "oh but mazda is owned by ford...therefore ford this...ford that."  I didn't say that because Ford owns Mazda. I always heard that Ford made the engine for the RX8. Why cratisize someone, before you know why something was said? You believe everything you hear? Most the time I don't, but I had never heard that Ford didn't make the rotary for the RX8 so I thought it was the truth. If thats a problem then I'm sorry.
My car is gunna be 10x faster than yours...haha... I'm gunna buy like 10 of those speedchips! I figure if 1 gets me 20hp then 10 will get me 200hp!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
alot of people with celis dont think it has enough bang for the extra bucks, who cares what we think, you will be the one with the payments. as for my vote lemme tell ya this... you buy me a 8 and you can have my gts 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
[quote=CelicaGTizzle]The engine is made by Ford, which I don't think will be all that reliable. It looks ok, but I wouldn't want to spend 29,000 on it. I would much rather get a RX7, even though it's older. You can get a much better car if your into speed or style, by getting an Evo or STi. I think the Sti engine will last the longest out of the 3. It is entirely your call. If you like the car then get it, but if you're unsure then don't get it yet, wait 2 or 3 weeks and then ask yourself if you really want that car, if you still can't decide then you must not want it all that bad. Ford did not make the engine. Last time I checked, they never made rotary engines for production cars. And don't give me "oh but mazda is owned by ford...therefore ford this...ford that."  I didn't say that because Ford owns Mazda. I always heard that Ford made the engine for the RX8. Why cratisize someone, before you know why something was said? You believe everything you hear? Most the time I don't, but I had never heard that Ford didn't make the rotary for the RX8 so I thought it was the truth. If thats a problem then I'm sorry. [/quote] who really cares who makes it? i havent heard about any problems with it and thats what matters. ford is getting better anyways i mean the lightning is quality and the new ford gt when that comes out, car and driver has only ever tested one car better then it, and that was the enzo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973
hookah-meister 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
hookah-meister
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973 |
actually I have heard some of the problems with the 8, including flooding, poorer gas mileage than mazda claims and some other things. I've always been a fan of the rotaries, but it's not something I'd want as a daily driver.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,289
Phantom 2001 Toyota Celica
|
Phantom
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,289 |
RX8 hmm.. what can I say? I like the design
![[Linked Image]](https://celicahobby.com/forums/attach/1953483609-sig46.jpg) Ask yourself one question. Is the juice worth the squeeze?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 367
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 367 |
well i went and drove one of these bad boys the other week. like people have said it is very quiet, but it is fast. it also has a perfect 50:50 weight ratio, so handling is really good. i liked it a lot, but there is a limitation on big Performance mods at the time. pretty much all they have is Intake/header/exhaust, which to me is still pretty good.
the front driver and passenger seat and leg room is pretty good. the only thing that i would say was wrong was the since the engine and trans sit so far back in the engine back, that the transmission itself is partly in the legroom area in the front. it kinda bulges out a little bit, but it was fine.
the back seats arent all that bad. there is more room back there then in the celica thats for sure. but it does have divider/cupholder thing between the back seats which i didnt like.
trunk space is alright, i think the celi has a little more room.
overall the car is decent. and yes you can get a 6 speed for under 30K a base model though. fully loaded with a few common packages added is going to put you into the 30-33K range.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 305
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 305 |
my 2 cents 50:50 weight ratio is nasty for handleing plus it's rear wheel drive
and
it is light as hell with a 1.3liter that puts out as much as a 2.0 liter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 264
Member 1990 Ford Ranger
|
Member
1990 Ford Ranger
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 264 |
one word-"slow" i saw them at the drags  The 8 wasn't built for a drag car, it's a track car. Take that thing out on auto-x and it'll fly
In parkour, no one is afraid. One is just...apprehensive.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
yeah my rx7 has shitty gas milage too, it the way the engine works because unlike normal engines that spray fuel and stop and then repeat it sprays fuel the whole time. same thing with oil too, when you start the car is sucks oil inside to lube everything, you should put a quart in every 1k. not the worst upkeep. i was talking to a saleman about the evo, you have to change the tires once a year, the kind for it or soft for grip but wear faster of course, and for oil changed you have to put mobil 1 synthetic
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,869 Likes: 1
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,869 Likes: 1 |
All I know is that the RX8 looks freakishly SEXY!
Aggressively Driven 2000 Celica GT-S 6 Speed
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
one word-"slow" i saw them at the drags  The 8 wasn't built for a drag car, it's a track car. Take that thing out on auto-x and it'll fly at those drags where a bunch of 'stock' street legal cars...and he got creamed on every race he was in, including an suv who beat his ass...haha 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
Rotary engine in general doesn't last long tho. You will probably be rebuilding the engine or swapping it out for new at around 80,000 miles or even less. Anywayz, RX8 are really nice car and probably more realiable than rx7 fd. but...loss in hp from rx7 to rx8 is just pure turn off tho.
I wouldnt mind getting Rx8 as a weekend car tho... just take it to circuit and have fun with the 50/50 ratio(^_^) im sorry but you dont know what you are talking about, first off all the rotary engine can last well over 80k if taking car of, my rx7 has 114k and still runs great. if you abuse an engine it wont last as long, there are people on this board who have bent valves on there car and well under 80k. the average life of an rotary is over 150k. as for the "loss" of hp for the 7 to the 8 that is a joke. the fd has 254hp and is twin Turboed you lose a mere 20 hp and your na wich, is more reliable. the new engine as a whole is more reliable. if an fd was na it would be a lot closer to the 160-170 mark. both the fd and the rx8 run 14s high 13s can be acheived with a stock fd. Turbo the 8 and it will be a beast
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
Ford owning them means cheapo Ford bin parts, much like on the uber-exspensive Vanquish. I'd never spend $30K on a car with Ford parts 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 184
Member 1995 Nissan 240SX (s14)
|
Member
1995 Nissan 240SX (s14)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 184 |
I worked on 3 FD before... so yep i know how FD's are not reliable. where as FCs those are pretty reliable(very reliable compared to FDs). So i think i know what im talking bout(^_^) and yet im not the owner of rx7 so i wouldnt say much about it. All i know is, rx7 fc's last very long compared to rx7 fd's. rx8s are more reliable than those two... yes i know that because they are completely different engine than the previous two. but i still dont know if the rx7 fd's would last 150k tho... because all the fd's that i worked on... they had about 150 k km's only... not miles
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 184
Member 1995 Nissan 240SX (s14)
|
Member
1995 Nissan 240SX (s14)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 184 |
Just to add tho.. Im not saying rotary engines are bad(^_^) I think it's the best thing japanese had invented because they are so different and unique. I wouldnt mind having (I want one~~) FC, FD or 8s and I wont care how much problem I ran into... I think vonduchguy puts it the best: as for my vote lemme tell ya this... you buy me a 8 and you can have my [240sx] 
Last edited by kenny_celi; Jun 29, 2004 11:00am.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
for 30K? there are Zs,STIs,and EVOs lurking about...for 30K range i would consider those first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 37
Member 2001 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 37 |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the rotary engine as used by Mazda was invented in Germany by Felix Wankel. Audi worked with it for a while but eventually didn't think it was economically viable. One of the early problems, even existing in the first engines Mazda produced, was the durability of the apex seals. Another was, and is, the mileage, although for the power produced compared to piston engines it may not be that bad. Mazda didn't invent the engine, they just developed it into a smooth, light powerplant. In my book the 3rd generation RX-7 was the best, miles ahead of the RX-8 in styling. The 2nd generation RX-7 was just plain ugly.
|
|
|
GjGts
2004 Toyota Celica
San Bernardino
Joined: August 2003
Thank you.: My props go out to my old celica that got me into wanting another one, farewell my little 2000 gts =( Random: Words of wisdom...Don't eat yellow snow and that for that matter dont eat brown snow either
|
Show All Member Profiles
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|