|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 18
Member 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 18 |
salut ! well I have an euro Celica gt (1.8l, 143hp, 6-speed) is there someone here who could give me real Performance for a manual GT Celica (something "tested") for 0/100 km/h and 1000m (I think 0/60 and 1/mile for you ) 'cause I'd like to know which one is the better between cli and MR S (I have no real tested Performances for these cars in France !) I tried to use the "search" fonction but I didn't find anything... thanks in advance...and sorry for my english...! ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,226
Specialist
|
Specialist
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,226 |
Your asking the wrong #'s. Our stock cars weren't meant for the 1/4 mile or 1000m for a GT and even more so for a MR S, European or not. I'll look into it regardless if no one else does.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,070
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,070 |
Aqua Teen Hunger Force...number one in the hood, G
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,014 Likes: 1
Specialist
|
Specialist
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,014 Likes: 1 |
I agree, 400m = 1/4 mile.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 18
Member 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 18 |
ok ! so, could you give me any distance/time for these two cars to comparate (every distance you have) 'just want to know the difference between mrs and Gt 'cause they have the same engine... merci !!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,125
Speed Omen 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Speed Omen
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,125 |
well, with the MR S being lighter and having the same engine - I'd expect it to be quicker...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,269
Specialist 2004 Dodge SRT4
|
Specialist
2004 Dodge SRT4
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,269 |
the celica is heavier, and is fwd so it wont lauch as good. stock to stock the celica is slower
was....5speed with i/h/e 15.41 @ 89.30mph 2.282 60'
is....04 srt4 stock 13.936 100.15mph 2.177 60'
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,265
TheFilipinoCrew 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
TheFilipinoCrew
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,265 |
yea i think the MRS has the upper hand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 186
Member 1991 Cadillac Seville
|
Member
1991 Cadillac Seville
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 186 |
i think the mr s looks like a frog, and it looks very cramped but mr s is faster
another honda kill story is always welcome
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 18
Member 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 18 |
here it what I found into a belgian/french automobile review ("le moniteur automobile") Celica/Mr 0/100km/h 8.3/8.4 0/120km/h 11.8/11.6 0/140km/h 15.7/15.2 0/160km/h 20.8/21.6 0/180km/h 29.4/31.3 400m 16.4/16.1 1000m 29.6/29.6 I saw too in another review that gt came 1000m into 29.2 so what do you think 'bout that how to know ? have you any distance/time "tested" ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,670
Specialist 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,670 |
they're quicker than a GT...lighter and mid engine design, which means more even on weight...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 18
Member 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 18 |
OK mrs is lighter than a gt but "moniteur automobile said that 0/180=29.4 for the gt and 31.3 for mrs why ? is it because tires are bigger on the mrs, or because of different limp speed ?
|
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|