|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 58
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 58 |
I know this have been discussed before, but whats better in terms of CAI, AEM or Injen?...whats the gains?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 288
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 288 |
injen = high end gain
aem = low end gain
I think..
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 355
ECelica Staff 2003 Toyota Celica
|
|
ECelica Staff
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 355 |
injen = high end gain
aem = low end gain
I think.. I agree it just depend which type of gain your looking for.
"Be kind to animals... Hug a Hockey Player!"
AFLAC!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 433
Senior Member 2004 Toyota Celica
|
|
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 433 |
That's about it.
Both tend to bog a bit at the low low RPMs (3,500 for my AEM).
And of course it will be brought up that TPR gives better gains all 'round with minimal bogging, but is not CARB legal.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476 |
Injen gains high end, loses low end
AEM gains low, not as much as high
TPR gains high and low
CARB only applies to CA...hes in RI.
Last edited by Easy_C; Nov 5, 2004 8:09am.
TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING!
TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 227
Member 1999 Toyota Celica GTS JDM
|
|
Member
1999 Toyota Celica GTS JDM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 227 |
I have an AEM on my cleica and i got a huge gain ( 12 hp ). Mind you it is a Japanese model and the AEM setup is different for my model. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
i say everyone wait till TPR gets their shit goin, then you can decide.
i'm just going to wait and get other things and put a new intake aside.
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 744
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 744 |
And of course it will be brought up that TPR gives better gains all 'round with minimal bogging TPR causes NO bogging or CELs at all. That was the whole point of the design. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 88
Member 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 88 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member 2004 Toyota Celica
|
|
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908 |
i say everyone wait till TPR gets their shit goin, then you can decide.
i'm just going to wait and get other things and put a new intake aside. Me 2, got to have it
|
|
|
|
Joined: August 2004
Thank you.: me, myself, and I...! Random: a bowl of rice, fried chicken, and a glass of water!
|
|
Show All Member Profiles
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|
![[Linked Image]](https://celicahobby.com/forums/attach/1953347226-siggg.jpg)
![[Linked Image]](https://celicahobby.com/forums/attach/1953344503-sig_v2.jpg)
