|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
from NC...some info from SCC...i think
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 466
Senior Member 2004 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 466 |
If the GTS (2522) is 80lbs lighter then the Type-R (2600), does the 15HP more on the Type-R really make up for all that difference to be 1/2 second faster in the 1/4 mile? Why is the Type-R so much faster, better gearing..? plus it probably stays in VTEC the whole way through...?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,546
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,546 |
that's what i was wondering...maybe test driver didn't stay in lift? And i thought Prelude's were faster than that...
good info
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
that's what i was wondering...maybe test driver didn't stay in lift? And i thought Prelude's were faster than that...
good info mag drivers can't stay in lift. especially on the 1-2 shift...people who can drive with a stock gts have gotten 14.7-14.9s
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 31
Member 2004 Acura RSX
|
Member
2004 Acura RSX
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 31 |
The ITR has a better 1/4 mile because of it's LSD and suspension. And other stuff already said.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,971
Boobie Vision 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Boobie Vision
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,971 |
yeah I dont thinkt he driver of this test was landing in each shift.. Still nice info CT!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
an ITR is basically a modified GSR...now the real question...would a ITR beat a GTS with SIMILAR modifications??...i'll let you guys figure that one out
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 180
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 180 |
ITR and GTS i think is a Driver's race with the edge to the ITR because of its LSD. Other than that, i think if the driver's horrible, you'll lose. GSR on the other hand... GTS can take anyday. Theres a whole thread about this at nc.or-g ... Oh yeah, in that magazine, those driver's were probably average driver's at best. They probably shifted at the usualy 7800 RPM rather than the 8400 Mark, so NOT landing lift. Big Difference.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,233
black & blue 4 you 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
black & blue 4 you
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,233 |
yeah the probably shifted at 7800 rpm but i still think the itr is faster than a gts
i've been changing but you'll never see me now now i'm blaming you for everything
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,971
Boobie Vision 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Boobie Vision
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,971 |
yeah the probably shifted at 7800 rpm but i still think the itr is faster than a gts have you driven a GTS? or have a friend who has one?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,869 Likes: 1
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,869 Likes: 1 |
I never knew that the GTS has better/faster specs when compared to the GS-R.
Aggressively Driven 2000 Celica GT-S 6 Speed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 430
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 430 |
funny, i was going through my feb05 sportcompact trying to find that article. but was unsuccessful, then i saw the date on the bottom of the picture, oct00.
nice info though.
Import Wars: 5/21, 6/18, 8/06, 10/08 Plymouth Meet: 5/28 HIN Boston: 4/30
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 555
Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 555 |
that's what i was wondering...maybe test driver didn't stay in lift? And i thought Prelude's were faster than that...
good info mag drivers can't stay in lift. especially on the 1-2 shift...people who can drive with a stock gts have gotten 14.7-14.9s Exactly, most of these shit magazines can't drive the cars to their actual capabilities due to restrictions such as possibly wrecking the car, so cars like the GTS are given awful reviews such as 0-60 in 8 seconds, which is complete bullshit.
~* Brotherhood Of Eternal Sleep *~ - Nocturnal Supremacy -
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,612
2low2slow 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
2low2slow
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,612 |
yeah but wouldnt it be nicer to have lift come in earlier foru gts guys, i think 1800 rpm of power is kinda short
Last edited by eric_h; Jan 1, 2005 9:26am.
A boats a boat, but the mystery box could be anything....Even a boat!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 466
Senior Member 2004 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 466 |
There was some guy who was suppose to be working on a Lift controller which would allow for adjusting lift about 1800rpm lower, Eric Lapka, of E.L. Prototypes, what happened to him?!
Since the Type-R does have LSD, it can hookup better...I wonder if the race was from a rolling start, say gun it at 2500rpm and the Celica driver shifts in lift the whole time, surely that would kill the Type-R right?
Also (a bit off topic) but would a short-shifter help you land lift better, or raise the risk of mis-shifting even more?
Last edited by GTS_Rosh; Jan 1, 2005 10:56am.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
lift is fine where it is...the rev limiter is what needs to be raised. ever see Lucky317 shifting at 8600 rpm? it's quite a sight...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 282
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 282 |
The celica is damn hard to keep fast. you have to be right on with your shifts. If you do youll be faster than a type s. Thats all stock of course. Their engine is a lot better for mods.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476 |
The celica is damn hard to keep fast. you have to be right on with your shifts. If you do youll be faster than a type s. Thats all stock of course. Their engine is a lot better for mods. lol show me an axle back exhaust for a type s that makes 10 whp. as far as this debate goes...the ITR and GTS are on par with each other. def drivers race. That time in the mag is bull...i have numerous timeslips showing 15.0 @ 96 Mph bone stock (with a horrible launch). Do i need to whip out physics on everyone and show ya
TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
you know if cams and race headers are on the way then we fear no one...do you now anyone comming out with those products chris?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476 |
dunno maybe TPR might but they are a nobody LOL
TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 655 Likes: 1
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 655 Likes: 1 |
ok, I am dumb when it comes to under the hood. What exactly will cams do for the car?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476 |
same thing most bolt on performance mods do...help the engine breath
TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 144
Member 2000 Toyota ; 97 Mitsubis Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota ; 97 Mitsubis Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 144 |
Chris, dontchu start bashing the Type S know...ur gonna drive me to the darkside, and leave toyota forever y0000
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476 |
we arent talking about the type s Ken...we are talking about the ITR. ITR is not god. In fact, after looking at its power band, my opinion of it went down a smidge...
TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 144
Member 2000 Toyota ; 97 Mitsubis Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota ; 97 Mitsubis Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 144 |
calm down Chris lol...i didnt say the type R was god...its just a really nice car
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476 |
No you didnt say it was, but a lot of people come on talking about it like it is. lol
its a nice car for the 90's
the styling got old in 2001 so they decided to market something more stylish...
TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 466
Senior Member 2004 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 466 |
Yeah the Type-R was based on a car that came out in 1993 (Japan), so it started getting old fast. If our cars came with LSD (can we add one, is that possible?)... and that damn VVTL-i came on sooner (for us average drivers) then man would the GTS ever own! Hopefully one of these days someone figures out the engine and comes up with a VVTL-i controller.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 895
Senior Member 2004 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 895 |
...yas you can add the trd lsd...its a prt-ee penn-ee though...i plan on doing it later later...later
Originally posted by A_Bathing_Ape: I hit, what else, oh plus dome.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476 |
Yeah the Type-R was based on a car that came out in 1993 (Japan), so it started getting old fast. If our cars came with LSD (can we add one, is that possible?)... and that damn VVTL-i came on sooner (for us average drivers) then man would the GTS ever own! Hopefully one of these days someone figures out the engine and comes up with a VVTL-i controller. The powerfc can alter the engagement point of lift. However the duration and overlap variances set on the stock high cam profile prevent it from making any really usable power when lowered. A solution for this might be available soon :thumbup:
TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!
|
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|