|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
 You Ahahaha. If it makes you feel better. Yes, laughing at a Honda fanboy makes me feel better. The RSX is a great luxury car, looks the part with its economy car interior. The Celica will walk all over it. Sorry to let you in on the news. 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
Yes, laughing at a Honda fanboy makes me feel better. The RSX is a great luxury car, looks the part with its economy car interior. The Celica will walk all over it. Sorry to let you in on the news.  Honda fanboy? I'm letting you in on the truth. The DC5 does have a higher top-end than the GTS. U need to step up off dis sack, biotch! You need some rest, or maybe you're too obessed with your Celica. Get your head out of your ass and realize that your car isn't the best.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
I never said it was the best, I said it was better than an RSX-S How do you figure the RSX-S has a higher top end? Oh wait, you read it in Compact Tuner Magazine, it must be true. 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
I never said it was the best, I said it was better than an RSX-S How do you figure the RSX-S has a higher top end? Oh wait, you read it in Compact Tuner Magazine, it must be true.  You've failed... A stock Type-S and a stock GTS are basically close. Look who's the fanboy now...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,070
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,070 |
I never said it was the best, I said it was better than an RSX-S How do you figure the RSX-S has a higher top end? Oh wait, you read it in Compact Tuner Magazine, it must be true.  You've failed... A stock Type-S and a stock GTS are basically close. Look who's the fanboy now... Basically close means one is superior than the other if I'm not mistaken. 
Aqua Teen Hunger Force...number one in the hood, G
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
Basically close means one is superior than the other if I'm not mistaken.  That's when the driver's skill comes in to play...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Member 2003 Subaru Impreza WRX
|
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,303
Specialist 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,303 |
i've been reading this and i think some of you really dont know what is going on.. the only way you can really judge this is to drive both cars urself and test their top end and whatever.. and i have and i must say the RSX has a higher topend dont deny it because i does.. but acceleration seems about the same.. i like the gearbox a lot more.. but celi still handles better
If you want peace... Prepare for War
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Member 2003 Subaru Impreza WRX
|
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74 |
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1 |
i've been reading this and i think some of you really dont know what is going on.. the only way you can really judge this is to drive both cars urself and test their top end and whatever.. and i have and i must say the RSX has a higher topend dont deny it because i does.. but acceleration seems about the same.. i like the gearbox a lot more.. but celi still handles better thats wut i think also. but i believe celica will launch much better cz of its ligthweight and enough hp for launch, while rsx-s has more hp and heavier, chances for rsx-s churpin is more than celica gts. but once rsx-s has gained speed, it will maybe go quicker. im thinkin that once the weight is carried, it is not a big factor of slowing down the car, yet still is. sounds dumb but i think that on a freeway a type s will get to 140s before the gts. torque plays along and all the other stuff. talkin about ppl with same driving skills
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
top speed of gts: 130 mph top speed of rsx-s: 139 mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
i've been reading this and i think some of you really dont know what is going on.. the only way you can really judge this is to drive both cars urself and test their top end and whatever.. and i have and i must say the RSX has a higher topend dont deny it because i does.. but acceleration seems about the same.. i like the gearbox a lot more.. but celi still handles better thats wut i think also. but i believe celica will launch much better cz of its ligthweight and enough hp for launch, while rsx-s has more hp and heavier, chances for rsx-s churpin is more than celica gts. but once rsx-s has gained speed, it will maybe go quicker. im thinkin that once the weight is carried, it is not a big factor of slowing down the car, yet still is. sounds dumb but i think that on a freeway a type s will get to 140s before the gts. torque plays along and all the other stuff. talkin about ppl with same driving skills the rsx-s and gts are extremely close in performance. basically it comes down to your particular cars. some celicas are made better than others as well as some rsx's are made better than other. some gts show better whp gaisn adn some rsx-s show better whp gains. that said, i have never lost to an rsx-s. maybe they werent the greatest drivers, but i'm not either.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
I never said it was the best, I said it was better than an RSX-S How do you figure the RSX-S has a higher top end? Oh wait, you read it in Compact Tuner Magazine, it must be true.  You've failed... A stock Type-S and a stock GTS are basically close. Look who's the fanboy now... basically close being the keyword. GTS > RSX-S Why don't you take your Honda-ness over to teamdc5.com
Last edited by DiabloGTS; Dec 31, 2003 9:30am.
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
the top speed of a GTS is NOT 130MPH
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
basically close being the keyword. GTS > RSX-S
Why don't you take your Honda-ness over to teamdc5.com Fanboys will never learn... 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,269
Specialist 2004 Dodge SRT4
|
Specialist
2004 Dodge SRT4
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,269 |
top speed of gts: 130 mph top speed of rsx-s: 139 mph hahahahahaha, top speed of GTS 130mph, hahaha, where the hell did you get that from, you ever try topping out your car? you have a GT, or GTS? auto or manual?
was....5speed with i/h/e 15.41 @ 89.30mph 2.282 60'
is....04 srt4 stock 13.936 100.15mph 2.177 60'
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
basically close being the keyword. GTS > RSX-S
Why don't you take your Honda-ness over to teamdc5.com Fanboys will never learn...  I know, because you just won't accept the RSX isn't faster than a GTS. *cough* celica forum, go away honda *cough*
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
I know, because you just won't accept the RSX isn't faster than a GTS.
*cough* celica forum, go away honda *cough* An RSX? We're all talking about a Type-S, not a RSX.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
New Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
New Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4 |
Their both great cars. my sister has a rsx so any one is good. rsx rides nice
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1 |
just relax with the rsx and gts arguments... were just trying to get opinions and facts that can prove which one is better. but the conclusion is there both great performing and looking cars. it is a matter wut you want and whats ur taste. as told if you want lots aftermarket parts, rsx has more. I will still get a gts over a rsx-s. gts is always more unique, and its the legendary celica. looks and performs better overall IMO and its an awesome car for being a 4 year old model and it still looks dope. afterall its more reliable its a toyota which i think their production is better than honda.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,303
Specialist 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,303 |
this is a totally nonsense dabate.. drive both cars and decide for urself you can't assume things to be true you can't debate bad drivers and what not if you drive both cars then you can make the decision.. but damn diablo you are so bias
If you want peace... Prepare for War
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1 |
this is a totally nonsense dabate.. drive both cars and decide for urself you can't assume things to be true you can't debate bad drivers and what not if you drive both cars then you can make the decision.. but damn diablo you are so bias exactly. go drive em urselves and you be the judge.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Member 2003 Subaru Impreza WRX
|
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74 |
I am a former Celica owner and I prefer the DC5.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
If you mean the RSX will beat a GTS on th highway, you are wrong. Coefficient of drag is a bitch at 130  No, I'm talking about the Type-S. Why would you compare a base with a upgrade? That's like saying: Which has a better top-end...Lancer or GT-R? (Don't answer this) So am I. The RSX-S only puts down 3 more WHP than the GTS, and it weighs more and has a higher coefficient of drag. Stock for stock, the celica kills it. Mod for mod, the celica kills it (save for hondata) On the track...well, we won't go there. I know, because you just won't accept the RSX isn't faster than a GTS.
*cough* celica forum, go away honda *cough* An RSX? We're all talking about a Type-S, not a RSX. Wow, you really can't read BTW, Type S is an RSX 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
this is a totally nonsense dabate.. drive both cars and decide for urself you can't assume things to be true you can't debate bad drivers and what not if you drive both cars then you can make the decision.. but damn diablo you are so bias The numbers speak for themselves. If you want to bash the celica, go someplace OTHER than everything celica.com
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
Wow, you really can't read BTW, Type S is an RSX  No, you're too lazy to type "Type-S". Either type "Type-S", "RSX Type-S", and/or "RSX-S" or don't type at all. You remind me those Mustang drivers who think they're the shit. You know nothing outside of your little Celica bubble.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
The numbers speak for themselves.
If you want to bash the celica, go someplace OTHER than everythingcelica.com And according to the majority, the numbers from a Type-S are higher. Some say they're the same, some say it's not...But if you get your head out of your ass, you might realize that more believe that the Type-S is higher. No one is "bashing". If you think that's bashing, then you're seriously weak at arguing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
Wow, you really can't read BTW, Type S is an RSX  No, you're too lazy to type "Type-S". Either type "Type-S", "RSX Type-S", and/or "RSX-S" or don't type at all. You remind me those Mustang drivers who think they're the shit. You know nothing outside of your little Celica bubble. You remind me of 15 year old kids who come here and say "my DSM ownz chu it goez 190 mph in teh 1/4 mile" I don't know anything about Honda because I don't like them, but I'm sure I know more about cars than you do, my friend. 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
You remind me of 15 year old kids who come here and say "my DSM ownz chu it goez 190 mph in teh 1/4 mile" That makes no sense at all... Can any tell me how that relates to me? Anyone.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
The numbers speak for themselves.
If you want to bash the celica, go someplace OTHER than everythingcelica.com And according to the majority, the numbers from a Type-S are higher. Some say they're the same, some say it's not...But if you get your head out of your ass, you might realize that more believe that the Type-S is higher. No one is "bashing". If you think that's bashing, then you're seriously weak at arguing. +3 whp and an extra 400lbs wow, that's a better car  BTW, put away your copy of import tuner, those articles and reviews don't mean anything. 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
You remind me of 15 year old kids who come here and say "my DSM ownz chu it goez 190 mph in teh 1/4 mile" That makes no sense at all... Can any tell me how that relates to me? Anyone. Eagle Talon TSi, anyone?  You are obviously a Honda lover...so why do you post here? Yes, I love the Celica more than the RSX, hence, I come here 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
Gunitceli, I apologize for taking over your thread.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
everythingcelica.com What do you expect? Celica fans.  End of story 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
You are obviously a Honda lover...so why do you post here? Yes, I love the Celica more than the RSX, hence, I come here  So? What's the difference if I love Honda? I can't enjoy both Honda and Toyota cars? I have to only love the Celica to even post here? You belong here, don't go anywhere else. They'll punk you so bad once they realize how biased you really are.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
I don't post other places, because people like you think the Celica is slow. Bring whatever POS you drive to a real race track, and we'll see where you end up. Bye! 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
I don't post other places, because people like you think the Celica is slow. Bring whatever POS you drive to a real race track, and we'll see where you end up. Bye!  Give me a link to where I've said the Celica is slow. What type of real race track? Drag? GT? Rally? You choose.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
^^ but really, go someplace else and tell me where its higher for stock??? ok.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,303
Specialist 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,303 |
i think this debate should have stopped after my comments.. because i think it all started with the guy asking which car he should get but he definately shouldn't ahve asked that on this forum because of some people that think their celica can beat everything on the road, he should just test both cars and pick which he likes.. im not bashing the celica seeing as i own one so calm down diablo
If you want peace... Prepare for War
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,303
Specialist 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,303 |
If you want peace... Prepare for War
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 834
Senior Member 1996 Geo Prizm
|
Senior Member
1996 Geo Prizm
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 834 |
good find 
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 144
Member 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 144 |
Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga G-Unit and Gunitceli i will beat you if you get a RSX- type S.
Do What You Do
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
good find  the celica gts link was already posted above (exact) and the rsx-s stats from this site were previously used. that said, i think we could have all used a reminder, thank you 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
I'll go take a pic of higher than 130 after lunch. 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
lol I don't even need to take one.
Thanks Heat!
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
You = 
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
lol I don't even need to take one.
Thanks Heat! if you will notice that the brake light is on. either it is photchopped or the car is on a dyno. two words: wind resistance  in any case..it is possible to be going over 130, but you would have to be on a slanted road or the wind would have to be with you. on a perfectly flat raod, on a perfectly windless day, in a perfectly stock car...your gts 6-speed is not meant to go over 130. and anyway, don't trust a speedo thats not calibrated when your going over 100.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
it is on a dyno. Wind resistance is a bitch, which is why the RSX Type S (there ya go Donegan) isn't as fast as the GTS BTW, I've had my car at 147 on a highway in PA on a flat road with a slight cross wind. You obviously don't drive a GTS, and if you do, you don't drive it rigtht, because 130 is only in 5th gear edit: if its a GTS auto, don't bother talking about the top speed
Last edited by DiabloGTS; Jan 1, 2004 11:20am.
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145 |
it is on a dyno. Wind resistance is a bitch, which is why the RSX Type S (there ya go Donegan) isn't as fast as the GTS BTW, I've had my car at 147 on a highway in PA on a flat road with a slight cross wind. You obviously don't drive a GTS, and if you do, you don't drive it rigtht, because 130 is only in 5th gear edit: if its a GTS auto, don't bother talking about the top speed You're straight out ignorant. I don't think you'll ever realize or admit that a stock GTS is not faster than the Type-S. You're too obsessed with your Celica. Fanboy...
|
|
|
Joined: April 2004
Thank you.: "Yo, yo, yo, who's ready for the Races?!" -Quote from 3 3ast 3 3urious Random: Woot to the Power Of Elite!
|
Show All Member Profiles
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|