Celica Forums General Discussion Exterior AEM vs. Injen

Previous Thread

Next Thread

Re: AEM vs. Injen Easy_C #161447 Jun 26, 2:08am Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 88 Pittsburgh, PA SleeprGT Member 2002 Toyota Celica GT SleeprGT Member 2002 Toyota Celica GT Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 88 Pittsburgh, PA I don't give a Rats @zz about CARB approval, I care about Performance. What are the stupid monkeys gonna do, Put you in CARB jail. Hey i wonder if my Trunk monkey Is carb approved.?

Re: AEM vs. Injen SleeprGT #161448 Jun 27, 9:57am Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL 2kVeilsideGTS Member 2kVeilsideGTS Member Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL i have kazuma, so should i really be worried about legality of my air filter?!:)

Re: AEM vs. Injen 2kVeilsideGTS #161449 Jun 27, 5:25pm Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 733 Frisco Tru_gts Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Tru_gts Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 733 Frisco AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM To my girl Truboo

Re: AEM vs. Injen Tru_gts #161450 Jun 27, 5:28pm Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 733 Frisco Tru_gts Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Tru_gts Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 733 Frisco i would worry more about passing smog w/ the TPR To my girl Truboo

Re: AEM vs. Injen Tru_gts #161451 Jun 27, 5:35pm Joined: May 2004 Posts: 670 frisco truboo Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica truboo Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: May 2004 Posts: 670 frisco Originally Posted by Tru_gts AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM lol you dork salina loves truman. *muah* baby truboo loves tru_gts

Re: AEM vs. Injen truboo #161452 Jun 27, 5:37pm Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass just got a sticker, it passes TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!

Re: AEM vs. Injen Easy_C #161453 Jun 27, 5:43pm Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 733 Frisco Tru_gts Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Tru_gts Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 733 Frisco how long ago did you past your smog? To my girl Truboo

Re: AEM vs. Injen Tru_gts #161454 Jun 27, 5:51pm Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 733 Frisco Tru_gts Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Tru_gts Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 733 Frisco Exactly Easy_C, CARB only counts in California and i happen to live in California and the cops here are trained to be assholes from time to time and i just dont want to go through the hassle of going to court to prove that i put back my old airbox and put my Intake back on once i pay my dismisal fee for the judge. To my girl Truboo

Re: AEM vs. Injen Tru_gts #161455 Jun 27, 6:00pm Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass ohhh no i wasnt trying to be pushy or anything, i know how cali is, i used to live there, i was just saying i just got a sticker this week TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!

Re: AEM vs. Injen Easy_C #161456 Jun 28, 3:11pm Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 404 San Jose, CA SiLvErGt2001 Senior Member 2001 ToYoTa Celica GT VVT SiLvErGt2001 Senior Member 2001 ToYoTa Celica GT VVT Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 404 San Jose, CA AEM Rules !!!

Re: AEM vs. Injen SiLvErGt2001 #161457 Jun 30, 9:13am Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 283 RaptorGTS Member 2000 Toyota Celica RaptorGTS Member 2000 Toyota Celica Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 283 dont you have to modify something when installing the Injen, like cut something. Cus there in one on ebay for 175. If it is not hard to install I might get one. The aen is really straight forwrd but i heard injen is harder to install.

Re: AEM vs. Injen RaptorGTS #161458 Jun 30, 11:37am Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 487 Portland, Oregon GTS2003BLK Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica GTS2003BLK Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 487 Portland, Oregon With the Injen you have to cut the ECU cooling tube. As a guy who had an Injen on his GTS my advice would be to go with the TPR CAI or the AEM. The Injen low end bog and lift lag just sucked big time, imo anyway. Check this thread out; https://celicahobby.com/ubbthreads/thread.f_1870079123_0_collapsed_5__1.html Last edited by GTS2003BLK; Jun 30, 2004 11:43am.

Re: AEM vs. Injen GTS2003BLK #161459 Jul 1, 1:02am Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,223 oas Specialist oas Specialist Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,223 im fhinking on a aem how is the gaint will i notice any difrent or is it so mini mall

Re: AEM vs. Injen oas #161460 Jul 2, 11:08am Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL Wow thx guys! I was going to go with the Injen myself but after your posts I may have to change my mind & go with the AEM. I read that the Bypass valve doesnt do much? Is that true? The Injen has the heat shield can I use that with the AEM CAI?

Re: AEM vs. Injen TRDLady #161461 Jul 2, 11:52am Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 487 Portland, Oregon GTS2003BLK Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica GTS2003BLK Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 487 Portland, Oregon All AEM Bypass valve questions answered here: http://www.aempower.com/faq.asp?fid=22&sid=3&tid= There where reports of the rubber or foam drying out in the early AEM Bypass valves and pieces of that foam or rubber getting sucked into the throttle body. Dont' how wide spread that problem was or if they corrected it. As for the Injen Heat shield/Splash I found this link; "Will work on (all) the 2.5, 2.75, and 3 inch Intake systems from Injen and "Most" others too." http://store.dragracing.com/product.asp?prodid=1486&catid=100&s=23

Re: AEM vs. Injen GTS2003BLK #161462 Jul 2, 5:55pm Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL Hey thx so much! I have been reading on the forum that its best to run a AEM CAI on the GTS b/c the GTS has high end torque & the AEM has low end torque. I was heading towards Injen but now that I have been researching this with you guys here I think I may be better off going with the AEM. Wow you guys are the best! I have gotten more positive feedback in the last 2 days here, then I received on the other forum that I "was" for 2 yrs! Thanks again

Re: AEM vs. Injen TRDLady #161463 Jul 3, 12:36am Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 487 Portland, Oregon GTS2003BLK Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica GTS2003BLK Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 487 Portland, Oregon Check this thread out as well: https://celicahobby.com/ubbthrea...&PHPSESSID=

Re: AEM vs. Injen GTS2003BLK #161464 Jul 3, 7:24am Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL That was great info. TPR does sound like a better fit for my GTS. However I am a little concerned about getting a ticket for not being CARB approved. AEM is the direction I will most likely go... You guys are so great

Re: AEM vs. Injen TRDLady #161465 Jul 3, 7:02pm Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 733 Frisco Tru_gts Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Tru_gts Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 733 Frisco AEM To my girl Truboo

Re: AEM vs. Injen Tru_gts #161466 Jul 3, 7:30pm Joined: May 2004 Posts: 670 frisco truboo Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica truboo Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: May 2004 Posts: 670 frisco Originally Posted by Tru_gts AEM lol salina loves truman. *muah* baby truboo loves tru_gts

Re: AEM vs. Injen truboo #161467 Jul 4, 4:25pm Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL Yes AEM it is! EverythingCelica has a great price on it for $225.00 so I think Im gonna go that route

Re: AEM vs. Injen #161469 Jul 6, 6:20pm Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass you guys should check on other boards for their opinions too New Celica.org and tcforum.com have some more reviews! TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!

Re: AEM vs. Injen Easy_C #161470 Jul 6, 6:28pm Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL I got a quote for $203.00 for the AEM CAI, $47.00 for the Injen Heat Shield & 36.00 for the AEM water bypass valve... Not sure if we will be putting it on this month, but definitely before the Slamfest in October... Oh I saw my Celi tonight & it looked TIGHT!!!! Hehe... I can't wait to pick it up & post pics L8tr D

Re: AEM vs. Injen TRDLady #161471 Jul 6, 6:54pm Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 1,668 MADERA, CA ravertony Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica ravertony Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 1,668 MADERA, CA i wouldn by the bypass.. but hey its your choice

Re: AEM vs. Injen ravertony #161472 Jul 12, 4:35pm Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL 2kVeilsideGTS Member 2kVeilsideGTS Member Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL im lost on which one to buy really. TPR is scaring me a little though, it has more airflow and with a smaller diameter pipe. does this mean some dirt might get into the engine? how safe is it for the engine reliability and does it need a water shield or anything else? thanks

Re: AEM vs. Injen 2kVeilsideGTS #161473 Jul 12, 6:43pm Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass If filtration is a concern you can always buy one without a filter and use your own. The smaller diameter pipe is key to Performance. I dont think a watershield is really necessary just plug up the holes in the plastic in front of the tire. TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!

Re: AEM vs. Injen Easy_C #161474 Jul 12, 7:05pm Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL 2kVeilsideGTS Member 2kVeilsideGTS Member Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL i have a Ec-1 front end and no engine plastic really anymore. so does this mean if it gets wet i could have a problem?

Re: AEM vs. Injen 2kVeilsideGTS #161475 Jul 12, 8:50pm Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass in order to hydrolock the engine, the entire filter needs to be submerged in water with the engine turned on. The filter on the TPR Intake is angled up and sits slightly higher than aem or injen...for that reason. But now, just getting the filter a little wet doesnt cost problems TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!

Re: AEM vs. Injen truboo #161476 Jul 15, 8:24pm Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL 2kVeilsideGTS Member 2kVeilsideGTS Member Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL Hey, long story short i need to order this Intake and have it here next week. i've tried pming u. do you make this yourself? is it possible to get one soon? plus im kinda skitish on ordering something till i talk to ya. check your pm and call me or just respond via pm or email or something. i just wanna know time frame of when i could get it. parents are out of town and well i wanna get all my stuff in so they don't notice i bought more stuff for my ride and didn't spend it on college stuff:)

Re: AEM vs. Injen 2kVeilsideGTS #161477 Jul 16, 6:16pm Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL Hey Guys I need your help. I read the thread about the hydrolocking on the CAI, & was thinking maybe its better to go with the Injen SRI instead. AEM doesn't make an SRI for the Celica GTS, & so I was wondering if I go with the Injen SRI will that still give me low end torque since the CAI on the AEM would do that. What do you think? Thanks D

Re: AEM vs. Injen TRDLady #161478 Jul 16, 6:24pm Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,296 Orlando/Gainesville, FL bmw52786 Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT bmw52786 Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,296 Orlando/Gainesville, FL Originally Posted by TRDLady Hey Guys I need your help. I read the thread about the hydrolocking on the CAI, & was thinking maybe its better to go with the Injen SRI instead. AEM doesn't make an SRI for the Celica GTS, & so I was wondering if I go with the Injen SRI will that still give me low end torque since the CAI on the AEM would do that. What do you think? Thanks D people say it lacks in low end power but when i got my injen SR on i felt NO loss... i love my injen SR, since im a slow gt auto i was goin for looks in the injen SR but was very surprised in the gains i got from it!!! Injen SR = (if only AEM made a SR for the celica, i'd be all over it)

Re: AEM vs. Injen bmw52786 #161479 Jul 16, 6:31pm Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL Thank you for your quick response bmw52786! After trying to do some research I was wondering if I was making the right choice. I am so glad I have these boards to look to for help & support. Thanks again D

Re: AEM vs. Injen TRDLady #161480 Jul 16, 6:43pm Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,296 Orlando/Gainesville, FL bmw52786 Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT bmw52786 Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,296 Orlando/Gainesville, FL Originally Posted by TRDLady Thank you for your quick response bmw52786! After trying to do some research I was wondering if I was making the right choice. I am so glad I have these boards to look to for help & support. Thanks again D thats what we are here for!! hopefully ill cya driving around some day!! honk if ya pass lol

Re: AEM vs. Injen bmw52786 #161481 Jul 16, 8:01pm Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL 2kVeilsideGTS Member 2kVeilsideGTS Member Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL why not get TPR? its a 2 in 1 package... SR and CAI all in one with no lift lag. seems like a sure thing to me

Re: AEM vs. Injen 2kVeilsideGTS #161482 Jul 18, 4:39pm Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL Hey bmw52786! ~ honk I will The only thing about the TPR 2kVeilsideGTS is that it isn't CARB approved, but true it may be the better of both worlds. With my luck I will be the one to get the stupid fine. Its too soon to tell exactly which waay I am going to go, but the info here is great. L8tr D

Re: AEM vs. Injen TRDLady #161483 Jul 19, 12:58pm Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL 2kVeilsideGTS Member 2kVeilsideGTS Member Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 312 Jacksonville, FL i drive with a kazuma exhaust. i doubt ima get pulled over and have the cop ask me about my air filter:) but trust me theres like a 1 in a million chance a cop would ask about your air filter. plus you legally don't have to show them shit since its in a closed compartment. thus unless you consent to a search he can't make you pop your hood.

Re: AEM vs. Injen 2kVeilsideGTS #161484 Jul 19, 1:42pm Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass CARB only applies to California. TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!

Re: AEM vs. Injen Easy_C #161485 Jul 20, 5:58am Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 Los Angeles, CA QTRMLR_1 Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica QTRMLR_1 Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 Los Angeles, CA just get a CARB sticker on ebay or someplace if you're worried about a fine, or buy an Injen or AEM afterwards and say to the judge holding up your Intake "See I had this in my car and that MEAN cop gave me a ticket!" I get my kicks on EC.

Re: AEM vs. Injen QTRMLR_1 #161486 Jul 20, 6:01am Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 Los Angeles, CA QTRMLR_1 Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica QTRMLR_1 Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 Los Angeles, CA And when you're through with the AEM or Injen, just send it back to the manufacturer for a refund claiming it gives a P0171 and permanent check engine light!!! I get my kicks on EC.

Re: AEM vs. Injen bmw52786 #161487 Jul 21, 9:18am Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,223 oas Specialist oas Specialist Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,223 Originally Posted by bmw52786 Originally Posted by TRDLady Hey Guys I need your help. I read the thread about the hydrolocking on the CAI, & was thinking maybe its better to go with the Injen SRI instead. AEM doesn't make an SRI for the Celica GTS, & so I was wondering if I go with the Injen SRI will that still give me low end torque since the CAI on the AEM would do that. What do you think? Thanks D people say it lacks in low end power but when i got my injen SR on i felt NO loss... i love my injen SR, since im a slow gt auto i was goin for looks in the injen SR but was very surprised in the gains i got from it!!! Injen SR = (if only AEM made a SR for the celica, i'd be all over it) sr=short ram??? aem make a short ram for the celica

Re: AEM vs. Injen 2kVeilsideGTS #161488 Jul 21, 9:25am Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,223 oas Specialist oas Specialist Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,223 any one have aem sri and a injen sri dyno for the GT

Re: AEM vs. Injen oas #161489 Jul 21, 10:19am Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 Los Angeles, CA QTRMLR_1 Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica QTRMLR_1 Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 Los Angeles, CA If smog and CARB doesn't hound ya, just get the TPR. Best bet for your money, and it's a SRI and CAI all-in-one. I get my kicks on EC.

Re: AEM vs. Injen QTRMLR_1 #161490 Jul 21, 10:58am Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 283 RaptorGTS Member 2000 Toyota Celica RaptorGTS Member 2000 Toyota Celica Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 283 i going tpr since it has good gains and its a good price

Re: AEM vs. Injen oas #161491 Jul 21, 11:54am Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,296 Orlando/Gainesville, FL bmw52786 Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT bmw52786 Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,296 Orlando/Gainesville, FL Originally Posted by oas any one have aem sri and a injen sri dyno for the GT uhhh correct me if im wrong but im pretty sure that AEM does NOT make a short ram for my gen celica!

Re: AEM vs. Injen bmw52786 #161492 Jul 21, 1:43pm Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 Los Angeles, CA QTRMLR_1 Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica QTRMLR_1 Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 Los Angeles, CA I believe you're right bmw. I get my kicks on EC.

Re: AEM vs. Injen QTRMLR_1 #161493 Jul 21, 3:54pm Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,223 oas Specialist oas Specialist Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,223 they do in my country

Re: AEM vs. Injen oas #161494 Jul 21, 3:55pm Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,223 oas Specialist oas Specialist Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,223 omg the pic got f56 up try http://www.powerzone.no/index.php?websho...f0025dbb0701f36 [powerzone.no]

Re: AEM vs. Injen oas #161495 Jul 21, 4:23pm Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,296 Orlando/Gainesville, FL bmw52786 Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT bmw52786 Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,296 Orlando/Gainesville, FL i have never seen that b4... never heard of aem makin a short ram for ours cars! if they did, that would be my first choice!

Re: AEM vs. Injen bmw52786 #161496 Jul 21, 5:25pm Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica TRDLady Member 2002 Toyota Celica Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 30 Orlando, FL Haha!!! Thanks guys. INFO was great! Nope no SRI on the AEM...So you think I should go with the TPR huh? Hmmmmmmm...The price is better & it gives both high & low gains plus you can change it between a CAI & SRI OK TPR IT IS!!!!!!! Now to get the $$$$ hehe... L8tr D

Re: AEM vs. Injen TRDLady #161497 Jul 21, 9:03pm Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Easy_C Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 476 Mass lol TPR passes smog...just got my sticker TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!

Join the conversation - Register Now or Log In to add your comment