|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 37
Member 2001 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 37 |
I know this has been asked, but you have a gt and a gts and you do the same mods to it wich is easer and wich will go faster
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
dikitzaps 1974 Toyota Celica
|
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342 |
the one with more power in the beginning DUR...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,899
ThE iRoN mAiDeN 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
ThE iRoN mAiDeN
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,899 |
the one with more power in the beginning DUR...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
depends. you could put the 2zz in a GT and it would keep up mod for mod lol any car can be fast with enough $$ into it.
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 65
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 65 |
i think what he is implying is that I think the mr2 runs the GT engine, and that maybe in some situations the gt would be better off, doesnt the GTS have less power in the begginning than a GT? and also...the compression ratio of the car, maybe a GT would be better off for Turboing?
these are all just speculations, i have no idea...
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
dikitzaps 1974 Toyota Celica
|
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342 |
i think what he is implying is that I think the mr2 runs the GT engine, and that maybe in some situations the gt would be better off, doesnt the GTS have less power in the begginning than a GT? and also...the compression ratio of the car, maybe a GT would be better off for Turboing?
these are all just speculations, i have no idea... the car with more power in the beggining will have more power in the end with the same mods... turbo GTS @ 7 psi will have more hp than a Turbo GT at 7psi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 65
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 65 |
right/...but you could put MORE psi on the gt because of its lower compression, thus maybe getting more hp in the end anyone know what the Turbo mr2 mkIII puts out, the one TRD did? because thats essentially the same engine if im not mistaken...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 814
Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 814 |
Here we go MRS- could produce more whp because its noteably lighter + mid-engined
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 13 |
right/...but you could put MORE psi on the gt because of its lower compression, thus maybe getting more hp in the end anyone know what the Turbo mr2 mkIII puts out, the one TRD did? because thats essentially the same engine if im not mistaken... He obviously said the SAME mods.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 411
Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 411 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 814
Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 814 |
GTS = HP GT = Torque Curve advantage GTS will win in a staright race, given equal drivers. Take them to auto-cross though, and it might be a different story
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,619
Specialist
|
Specialist
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,619 |
GTS = HP GT = Torque Curve advantage GTS will win in a staright race, given equal drivers. Take them to auto-cross though, and it might be a different story Exactly, the GT will own a GTS in the AutoX. This is due to the GTS's 'sweet spot' being in the higher rpms, and the GT's being down low. Since in autoX, most of the time you will be in the low to mid rpms, the GT will take the GTS.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,061
Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,061 |
It depends... naturally aspirated, the gts will always be better because of lift.
Forced induction, however... is a different story. The 1zz has a lower compression ratio, so it can handle a higher boost pressure than the gts' 2zz can. Keep in mind... i'm only talking about the engines when they have stock internals, because as soon as you start to change the internals, the better engine comes down to which one has more money on it. I bought my GT because i intended to go Turbo... and wanted a lower compression ratio to start with.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,320
Specialist 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,320 |
gt, you will have more torque then gts no matter the same mods, and the powerband is in the lower rpms, the vvtl-i in the gts will always kill the max psi if going f/i. basically, the best would be to go with the gt, you could put the same amount of psi into both engines, lets say 12psi, but with vvtl-i kicking in, you have to bring it down lower, so, i have to say gts for n/a mods and gt for f/i mods, but the question is which has more tq/hp, it have to be the gt, since you can only go so much with n/a...and of course, more tq and lower rpm powerband!!
Fudge The World! Die Hard, Die Fast, Die Strong & Live Life to its Fullest
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,028 Likes: 1
Bread Fishing.. 2001 Toyota Celica GT
|
Bread Fishing..
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,028 Likes: 1 |
wow so a stick gt is faster than a stick gts for lower end ...
LNK "you only need something when you know it exists..then it becomes a want"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442
Wheezy Joe 2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
|
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,442 |
I've raced a couple of GT's in autox, and they aren't going to touch a well driven GTS.
On the track, my GTS never sees 5K rpm after I get it started.
Keeping it high in the revs is hard, and it's a lot of work, but it's a hell of a lot faster on an exit than a GT
To have played and laughed with enthusiasm and sung with exultation To know even one life has breathed easier This is to have succeeded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
dikitzaps 1974 Toyota Celica
|
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342 |
I've raced a couple of GT's in autox, and they aren't going to touch a well driven GTS.
On the track, my GTS never sees 5K rpm after I get it started.
Keeping it high in the revs is hard, and it's a lot of work, but it's a hell of a lot faster on an exit than a GT tell CID498 that
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396 |
GTS = HP GT = Torque Curve advantage GTS will win in a staright race, given equal drivers. Take them to auto-cross though, and it might be a different story Exactly, the GT will own a GTS in the AutoX. This is due to the GTS's 'sweet spot' being in the higher rpms, and the GT's being down low. Since in autoX, most of the time you will be in the low to mid rpms, the GT will take the GTS. i used to think this too, but i put down over 125wtq @ 4400 rpms, thats about what modded gt's dyno at 6K now given i'm not normally modded, but it shows the potential of the gts with tuning on the bottom end.
Controlled Inertia President 8.831 @ 79.8 mph (best 1/8 new motor 12/02/04) 2.007 (best 60') All motor
|
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|