Previous Thread
Next Thread
New Reply
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Sorry if this has been asked before, but if two cars are identicle in every way except one has a 400hp V8 and the other has a 400hp 4 cylinder, which car is faster? 400hp is 400hp right?
Trying to settle an argument with a Mustang owner.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
The weight will make a ton of difference for sho, tires, rear wheel drive, all wheel drive, transmission, this thread is going to be fun thumbsup

Mustang = ugly thumbsdown rofl j/k some are nice spineyes
Celica = Hot tasty


[Linked Image]

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 453
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 453
Mustangs...I like the car, not the drivers


The 2ZZ god

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks iggy,
The argument I'm having with this guy is, if two cars are identiicle in every way, which one will win. Same weight, same gears, same driveline, etc...

I say "400hp is 400hp", the two cars would be the same.
He says "No, a V8 will win because it's a bigger motor"

Thanks Jtultra,
But not all Mustang owners are jerks, just seems like most of them are. I had a 69 Mach 1 that I loved. Just got tired of fixing it all the time.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by badceli
Thanks iggy,
The argument I'm having with this guy is, if two cars are identiicle in every way, which one will win. Same weight, same gears, same driveline, etc...

I say "400hp is 400hp", the two cars would be the same.
He says "No, a V8 will win because it's a bigger motor"

Thanks Jtultra,
But not all Mustang owners are jerks, just seems like most of them are. I had a 69 Mach 1 that I loved. Just got tired of fixing it all the time.

Ok this is simple now, it's a drivers race then. I beat faster cars because I was a better driver lol. cool Very sad IMO that I could beat a vett with my 280Z but also funny. rofl

Last edited by iggy; Nov 30, 2004 6:26am.

[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Shit, forgot to mention same driver in both cars. Just trying to figure out which car would be faster.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
eric...its like this buddy...the v8 has more displacement, and less RPM range...he will hit 400 hp at 4500 to 5000 rpm at the limit and have to shift...whereas a 400 hp 4 cylinder won't hit 400 hp until around 6500 rpm, but will be able to keep it going in a shorter gear for 2000 rpm after that...the v8 may take it off the line, but the 4 cylinder should win overall because it can stay at higher power in a lower gear for a longer period of time. Bigger displacement means more torque, and the power comes faster...generally a v8 has a redline of around 5000 rpm at the most, whereas a built 400 hp 4 cylinder (it would have to be built to stand that much boost) could rev until 8500 rpm, and in some cases even 9500 rpm...that should help sort things out... thumbsup

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by AZZKIKR
eric...its like this buddy...the v8 has more displacement, and less RPM range...he will hit 400 hp at 4500 to 5000 rpm at the limit and have to shift...whereas a 400 hp 4 cylinder won't hit 400 hp until around 6500 rpm, but will be able to keep it going in a shorter gear for 2000 rpm after that...the v8 may take it off the line, but the 4 cylinder should win overall because it can stay at higher power in a lower gear for a longer period of time. Bigger displacement means more torque, and the power comes faster...generally a v8 has a redline of around 5000 rpm at the most, whereas a built 400 hp 4 cylinder (it would have to be built to stand that much boost) could rev until 8500 rpm, and in some cases even 9500 rpm...that should help sort things out... thumbsup
^^^ [Linked Image from us.i1.yimg.com]


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thank you very much Steve. I should have known you would know the answer to that one. I will definitely use that in my next argument with him.
Now I have one more question. He thinks his 96 Mustang is the shit. It's built and has about 400hp. He says there is no way my hamster powered little 4 banger will ever beat him, even after I do reach my 400whp goal for my Celica. Now I know that if I am able to reach 400whp, I will be spinning my wheels like crazy, while he will get better grip and take me off the line, but I think with him being so much heavier and me being able to rev higher, I should be able to take him.
What do you think?

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
ok if the mustang is rear wheel it has an advantage there since rear wheel gets the power down better but the wight in a mustang is a lot compared to a celica-so that on top of the rpm stuff will definately make this a drivers race but imo a full 1/4 mile the celica would win if the torque numbers are right since the torque is what will get you moving not the hp the hp keeps you moving


respect the gt-s

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks celicadragon,
We have both been racing cars for about the past 20 years or so. Not professionally, just for fun, so I'm not sure who is going to be the better driver. He does have the advantage there because he has had Mustangs forever and I have never driven a 400hp 4 cylinder.
I'll be sure to get lot's of practice at the track before I take him on though. This is one race I would really hate to lose. I would never hear the end of it.

Last edited by badceli; Nov 30, 2004 8:09am.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by badceli
Thanks celicadragon,
We have both been racing cars for about the past 20 years or so. Not professionaly, just for fun, so I'm not sure who is going to be the better driver. He does have the advantage there because he has had Mustangs forever and I have never driven a 400hp 4 cylinder.
I'll be sure to get lot's of practice at the track before I take him on though. This is one race I would really hate to loose. I would never hear the end of it.
Just tell him good race and to STFU rofl Good Luck thumbsup


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
I give up iggy, what does STFU stand for? I think I know what the "FU" stand for, but what about the "ST"?

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
eric...I recommend building your block with the monkeywrench internals, sleeving the block, and o-ringing the bastard to make sure it can handle whatever boost you want to throw at it...then I recommend a c2power tranny to hold the torque you will create, and a stage 3 turbo kit from him, only instead of going with the Garrett GT28RS turbo, you go with the GArrett GT30R turbo...its got a smaller turbine housing, but a bigger compressor housing...it spools faster and makes more power too...either that or go with the GT32 with either the 71mm or 76mm trim...its up to you...they are all good for around 500 hp...also, the Monkey wrench racing guys have their 1zz turbo MRS putting down 385 to the wheels, and 295 ft-lbs of torque...I think with the GT30R or the GT32 you might even break that if everything is built properly to withstand it

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by badceli
I give up iggy, what does STFU stand for? I think I know what the "FU" stand for, but what about the "ST"?

STFU = Shut The Fuck Up lol tell him that thumbsup

Don't worry we are all [Linked Image from 64.227.153.127]'s at one time spineyes


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks Steve, I will be getting all my internals from MWR and a c2 tranny.
As for the turbo, it's too late. My car is in the middle of having a custom turbo kit installed right now. The last time I asked you, you said you didn't know much about turbos. Guess you been doing some reading huh?
Anyway, I took the shops advise and they are installing a Precision T3/T4 sc32 turbo, good for 480hp. What do think of Precision turbos?
I have seen MWR's MRS. I was so excited when I seen that, I even posted a topic on it awhile back.
That's why I'm making 400whp my goal. The 500whp Celica QTRMLR_1 told me about is a little too crazy for me. If I can hit 400whp, I'll be good with that.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks iggy, yes I'm still a newb.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
the one that weighs less and is geared for whatever your doing...

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks spaztikid. I like your sig by the way. I can't believe nobody said anything to him about that. Guess everybody figured "What's the use".

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks spaztikid. I like your sig by the way. I can't believe nobody said anything to him about that. Guess everybody figured "What's the use".

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
eric...precision turbos are nice too...I'm just omre familiar with the garrett line...MAKE SURE THAT when they build your block they SLEEVE the cylinders and O-RING the block...that way you won't have problems with blowing the head gasket when you trun up the boost

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
just beat him


respect the gt-s

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Yes, I will definitely do that. I would like to go with the 2.0 kit. Think that's worth doing? Well not 2.0, but 1.9 something. I can't remember. The internals are going to have to wait a few more months. I've spent my limit for this year. Just trying to learn as much as I can before I start buying everything.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
actually...I wouldn't bore...just purchase their piston and sleeve kit...that will set you straight as they come as a set...boring may leave the cylinder walls between each individual cylinder too thin...if you do bore (its been done safely) just make sure you sleeve it as that will help contain the boost without you having to worry about having problems due to high boost...

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
I figured I would have to bore if I'm going to reach 400whp. I wonder if MWR's MRS is bored. Do you know?

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
I wish I had the money to do the internals while it's in the shop, but after the turbo install, it's off to body shop, then the last stop is BDaudiocreations. After it get's out of that shop, the mods for this year will be like this...
Custom turbo kit, Precision T3/T4 sc32 turbo, down pipe, 440cc injectors, Greddy E-manage piggy back ECU, High Flow intercooler, Walbro 225 fuel pump, HKS BOV, 3" pipes from header back, N-1 exhaust, chrome spark plug cover, custom intake manifold chromed, painted engine plastics, NOS w/65 shot, 2 NX bottles, 2 NX remote bottle openers, RPS clutch, Fidanza flywheel, APR widebody kit molded on, TRD wing, shaved door handles, Sparco gas door lid, window tint, BRS Carbon Fiber hood, APR Carbon Fiber mirrors, Carbon Fiber wind splitters, Carbon Fiber canards, black Racing Hart CR wheels, Stoptech BBK, TRD coilovers, Tanabe strut bars, 18" Treo sub in molded fiberglass, Zapco 9.0 amp, 2 Zapco 3.0 amps, 2 Boston component set's, 2 SPL caps, 2 red top batteries, mini PS2, Kenwood head unit, Acuistic DVD player, 3 7" screens, chrome 4 point roll bar, chrome bars to hold NX bottles and amps, Greddy boost controller and turbo timer, boost, nitrous and egt gauges, Momo steering wheel, Black Corbeau A-4 seats w/ 4 point harnesses, TRD shift knob, painted dash and all interior plastics.
So I'll be pretty broke after all that is done.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Here is what the exterior will look like.
1953359469-1953331291-products_subcatphoto_aerokits.jpg

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
And the turbo set up is being ran the same as the Red Dragon's
1953359479-p129563_image_small.jpg

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
i dont think that 2.0 kit is a very good thing to buy for the money and i heard its not very streetable


respect the gt-s

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
That's okay, it's not a daily driver anymore. The 2.0 kit would give it more power, right? What bad things have you heard about it besides not being good for daily driving?
Shit. I have to go. I'll be back later.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 1
obviously v8 car will have more torque, so it will kill the 4.
but somehow if the 4 cylinder is modded like hell with a crazy turbo and all that, and if the torque is the same, then weight is another factor. now lets say the v8 is in the same car as the 4 cylinder, engine is gonna be bigger and heavier, and 4 cylinder tranny wont keep up with it and suspension will sag. now lets say everything is perfect, same weight, same hp and torque, 4 cylinder will have more of a challenge in order to keep up with the 8, 4 cylinder has to stay on peak rpm levels, shift quick and precisely. it wouldnt be much difference if both have the same wtq, whp and same weight somehow.
if there is such thing like that, i would still take the 4 cylinder over the v8

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
yeah, but he is referring to a bulit celica (very lightweight) vs a bulit (but fat) mustang

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
reliability is one thing


respect the gt-s

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks stefanoc. As for the tranny, I will be getting one from c2power and I bought TRD coilovers that I think are pretty stiff. Will those two things take care of the problem you were talking about?

celicadragon, that's a whole other argument him and I have. He things his Mustang is more reliable than my Celica. I don't think so.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
mustang is a ford F.ix O.r R.epair D.aily


respect the gt-s

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
celica=perfect


respect the gt-s

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Damn right!

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
for sho


respect the gt-s

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
I have been selling off all my toys to help pay for all this stuff. I still have the jet-ski for $3,500 if anybody wants it. It's an 1100 stx, perfect condition.
1953359651-1953353226-101_4042.jpg

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
No, my wife is not for sale. Neither is my motocross bike. THAT I will never give up.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Hahaha my wife is for sale PM me for details, in fact I will give her to you for free. Must haul away, sorry I have a strict no returns policy. happywink

Disclaimer!!!!!!!!!!!!

The wife works create what the husband envisions to effectively meet their needs. She will also provide professional advice on what will best help achieve success. However, the wife will not guarantee the financial success to anyone who she marries. The decision to get married is solely the decision of that person and Iggy or any affiliates, employees are not liable for any damages suffered as a result of that decision. All services performed by the wife are the financial responsibility of the husband once they decide to marry the wife, even if the end result does not meet expectations. Caution the wife can be hazardous to your heath and may financially cripple you so choose wisely.

Last edited by iggy; Nov 30, 2004 6:22pm.

[Linked Image]

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 173
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 173
I saw this episode of car and driver where they did track tests on tuner cars - there was a 400+HP golf, and it was faster then the stock Lambo Merciologo (??) with similar power but a V12.. it was also really close to the tuned Corvette engins, so forsure, it'd be way better then the stock ones.. I think a tuned EVO was the fastest one, I believe it was a 4 banger too - but closer to 500HP

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Originally Posted by stefanoc
obviously v8 car will have more torque, so it will kill the 4.

You beat me to this point... Sad but true.

You can crunch the numbers all you want, but when it comes down to it, the V8 will own you 9 times out of 10, due to the fact that the V8 will have double the displacement, and gobs of torque throughout the powerband. Also keep in mind that V8 will start making power low in the revs, and reach peak power a lot sooner, due to a shorter rev range.

Sure, you can talk about forced induction, but it's only a way to help reduce the shortcomings of a 4-cyl platform, A 4-cyl will need to work twice as hard to make the same power a V8 does.

You can offset the torque differnce through weight reduction, better tires and a susension that will help your car put that power to the ground, but the sad truth is that any 4-cyl platform will be playing catch-up in terms of the amount of modification to make it on par with most v8 powered platforms.

Now, lets say we compare two cars of sililar performance levels; a Mustang GT to an STi. Both are pretty close to one another in terms of performance: both cars put down about 300 HP. The mustang lays down 320 Ft Lbs of torque while the STi puts down 300 Ft Lbs. of torque The STi weighs in at around 3298 Lbs. and the new mustang GT weighs around 3487 Lbs. the torque difference will offset the weight difference, so, they're evenly matched in terms of performance.

Out of the box, they will be evenly matched from the factory (we will not consider the cobra mustangs here) The AWD setup on the STi will pay off on the initial launch if both drivers are equally matched, however, turbo lag and lower torque band will see that gap shorten quiclky after that. Still the STi can win against a stock car, but the race would be interesting to see whoever wins.

With some exhaust work, headers and an intake, numbers on that mustang will vastly improve, However, an STI owner will be spending more for similar gains, since the STi is pretty hot from the factory. you will need a turbo upgrade, better intercooler, etc; the mustang, by contrast, has a lot of room for improvement on it's 4.6L modular engine; the STI powerplant has most of it's optimization done at the factory. lastly, that base-trim mustang GT will cost you less money to buy and build up than an STI.

It's not impossible, but it's also not as cost effective. Most import fans claim that almost any 4-cyl can be made to be more ferocious than it's 8-cyl forefathers, but I have seen little proof of this in reality, most of the time, a V8 will hand you your ass if you drive a 4-cyl, boosted or not (My mom's bone-stock, automatic, rusted and out of tune Cougar XR7 walking all over a DSM eclipse with $10K in turbo and other upgrades comes to mind)

Don't forget, V8 owners can go FI too, superchargers add a LOT to the performance of a V8 musclecar, since torque and HP is in ample supply from the get-go. In the end, it could be considered a losing battle most of the time.

If you want to take on a V8, displacement is your friend. Go with the biggest motor you can get. Nissan Sentra Sepc V has a big 4-cyl, and produces lots of torque. with the right mods, the weaker Spec V will beat a GTS celica, mostly because of that extra displacement and torque.

Part of the mystique of import dominance comes from cars like the Z cars and the supra, don't forget these cars come with 6-cyl engines, more displacement, and more torque.

THe last way to offset this difference is to play to the strong suit of the 4-cylinder engine: Rev range. A 4-cyl engine has the potential to rev much higher, and sustain those revs longer. Since a inline-4 achieves peak torque and HP in the high revs, making the motor rev faster, and get to the sweet-spot faster will help you out, knife-edging the crank, lightening the car up, and lightening and strenghtening the valvetrain will go a long way to do this. very few stock V8 engines can rev past 6K safely (except certain ferarris, corvettes or the motor in the mustang cobra R) this is your advantage. The one thing everyone can agree on; you need to beat on a 4-cyl to win in a race with a v8, keep those revs high, and keep the engine screaming to make the same power as the typical V8, which can lazily turn and still shred tires into clouds of smoke.

Of course, this all applies to the drag race, road racing would be another story, since the STi will corner and brake better than the mustang GT.

You need to look at car specs when thinking about building a car to take on a V8, don't look at peak HP numbers, because that's just the PEAK power, you need to check a dyno graph; does the car make 400 Peak HP? Where is it making that power? probably close to the redline. V8's will make peak power closer to the midrange, and will keep making that power up to redline. Also, don't neglect that torque curve, usually, torque decides who wins a race, not the HP numbers.

Last edited by Rave669; Nov 30, 2004 8:06pm.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,174
Specialist
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,174
yeah, i have the issue. it's the supertuner challege. if you guys want, i can post up the specs on all the cars.


-Combatc87- / -SgT._BiLkO-

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
i dont really think the torque is that much of an issue when drag racing...

400hp on our car for example, is boosting at about 22-25 psi roughly...

from the time you launch till the time your hitting full boost should only be a split second...

now with a good lauch on DR's, a 1.8 60 foot can be achieved...

lets say for example we're running a mustang cobra... i think its gonna be pretty much even... his weight will ofset his torque advantage...

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
What about drivetrain loss? You get a lot more drivetrain loss on the F/F celica than you would on the F/R GT mustang.

You would only beat the mustang if the driver of said mustang could not control his wheel spin.

Also, new factory mustangs have some suspension upgrades that help in the 1/4 mile, such as a panhard bar from the factory to eliminate wheel hop and torquesteer.

I'm not saying it's impossible, but turbos don't solve everything. You're already talking about adding turbo, and if you're running 22+ psi of boost, you will need internal upgrades for it to hold up to the increased stress, all the while, the mustang will still be running NA, with just a couple bolt-ons and some ecu programming to make similar numbers. big difference in price here.

Torque plays more of a part than you know; you should talk to some streetrod owners, let them take you for a ride sometime, and you'll see what I'm talking about.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
i know the joys of torque... one of my buddies has a s/c'd 98 cobra...

obviously the 4 cyl would have to be f/i and have internals...


i'm willing to bet money, that in a few months when jeff church runs his celica, you'll see some times you wont beleive...

the new stangs have a s/c stock... and yeah, they can get a good launch as well... i'd say somewhere like 1.4 - 1.6 on DR's...

but i still think the weight is gonna be more of an issue than the torque is in a drag race...

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
HAHA! iggy, you kill me. You better hope your wife doesn't see that. I laughed my ass off though. I feel your pain.

Thanks GTaintsobad, that gives me hope. Well, it did until I got to Rave669's post.

Thanks Rave669, That post was longer than some of GOLDCELICA's. Very good information though. What really sucks is, this guy I want to race also has his car torn apart right now and is adding a supercharger. I think I might be sucking a little.

Thanks combatc87, sure, that would be cool. Let's see it, if you don't mind.

spaztikid, you always give me hope. I still get nervous when I see your name on one of my topics, the way you yell at people sometimes. I never know if you're goiing to come on and call me an idiot or something. Thanks for not doing that.

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,233
black & blue 4 you
2000 Toyota Celica GT
black & blue 4 you
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,233
damn do you realizes that a 400 hp celica will be doing 9-10's

the 400 hp v-8 will probably do 12


[Linked Image]
i've been changing but you'll never see me now
now i'm blaming you for everything

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
400 hp celica will also do 12's...

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
That would be nice if that was true EuRoBoGT, but I think 11's might be the best I could ever hope for. Not sure though. Plus mine will be a lot heavier than it should be, with all the chrome, sound system, etc...
I have more fun at shows than I do at tracks. You ever go to shows in Texas?

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 49
Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 49
nothing can beat a celica, common you know this man

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Okay, I guess 11's was wishing a little too much. I would happy with 12's.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Damn right REDDASHCELICA01, but only if you grade in more than drag racing. Like...Looks, style, handling, price, reliability, interior room, gas mileage, etc...

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by badceli
HAHA! iggy, you kill me. You better hope your wife doesn't see that. I laughed my ass off though. I feel your pain.
Hahaha badceli I'm serious. it's really not cool IMO, read it and let me know what you think of it. spineyes thumbsdown
https://celicahobby.com/ubbthreads/thread.f_1953355375_0_collapsed_5__1.html

deal angry Also I will offer you a double your bullshit back guarantee. angry deal

Last edited by iggy; Dec 1, 2004 7:56am.

[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Well shit. Not sure what to say about all that. I can't tell if you're pissed or glad about it. I have been there and done that before. Always works out in the end.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by badceli
Well shit. Not sure what to say about all that. I can't tell if you're pissed or glad about it. I have been there and done that before. Always works out in the end.

I'm pissed, but trying not to let it bring me down, so what happened do tell, you can PM me about it if you don't want to share it with the world. spineyes


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
There isn't enough time in a day for me to tell you all my stories. Some day we'll have to sit and drink all night and I'll tell you some stuff that will make you say "Damn, that is one messed up life you have had there".

Last edited by badceli; Dec 1, 2004 8:26am.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
the celica looks better anyway


respect the gt-s

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Damn right!

Now you say "For sho"

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Okay iggy, I'll tell you one quick one if it will make you feel better.
About 17 years ago, I was dumped by a girl I loved and was going to marry. After that, I said to hell with relationships, I have my motocross bike and I'm going to be the next World champion.
So a couple years past and I had been without a girlfriend for a long time, when I finally met a great girl. We had been together for a few months when I had to take a trip to do some training with the Special Forces in the Army for a month. Couldn't wait to get back to see her again.
When I got back, I went to her house and knocked on the door, she opens it and says "Oh, you're back, ummm this isn't really a good time". I said "Why not?". She says "Because my old boyfriend has moved back in with me and we are back together again, sorry".

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by badceli
Okay iggy, I'll tell you one quick one if it will make you feel better.
About 17 years ago, I was dumped by a girl I loved and was going to marry. After that, I said to hell with relationships, I have my motocross bike and I'm going to be the next World champion.
So a couple years past and I had been without a girlfriend for a long time, when I finally met a great girl. We had been together for a few months when I had to take a trip to do some training with the Special Forces in the Army for a month. Couldn't wait to get back to see her again.
When I got back, I went to her house and knocked on the door, she opens it and says "Oh, you're back, ummm this isn't really a good time". I said "Why not?". She says "Because my old boyfriend has moved back in with me and we are back together again, sorry".
ok that does sux, that must have ripped your heart out cry Glad to see you found a good one this time thumbsup


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Yup. I do have a good one now. Can you believe an old dork like me actually got a young, rich, model to marry me? Had to go to Germany to find her, but things are pretty good now.
I just noticed that you look exactly like my little brother and he does pretty good with the girls, so I'm sure you will be okay.

Now let's go back to talking about cars before somebody asks us what the hell we are talking about.

QTRMLR_1 said he's going to come on here and give me his take on this topic. You know he is a die hard racer. Anybody that strips out their interior to shave another fraction of a second off their 1/4 mile is definitely a die hard.

Last edited by badceli; Dec 1, 2004 2:40pm.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Got one more question on top of this one.
How do I reach a higher top speed? Does the c2power tranny come with a longer final drive? What would be a guess on what kind of top speed we could reach with this tranny? Sorry if I sound like an idiot, I don't know anything about transmissions.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,174
Specialist
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,174
i believe final drive is not in the tranny, it's in the differential. maybe (read: likely) i'm wrong


-Combatc87- / -SgT._BiLkO-

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
No. You might be right on that. Will somebody who knows jump in here before I say something else stupid?

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
I really have to run now and do something, so I don't have time to post up some stuff I found on the topic of this thread. But to answer your question, I found this on the c2power website:

"We have a COMPLETLY NEW INSIDE (all gears, final drive, LSD) from Chromly-molibidenium (as strong as possible material). from 1-6 gears teeth are straight cut to hold as much torque as possible."

And in the chart the final drive in the C2 GT 6spd tranny is unchanged from the Toyota GT at 4.312. So the top speed is not increased.

http://www.c2power.com/?menu=3&submenu=1&id=5


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Well that's good information. Can't wait to see what you found out on the other topic.

So how in the heck do we increase our top speed?

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,233
black & blue 4 you
2000 Toyota Celica GT
black & blue 4 you
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,233
look just use this 1/4 mile calcultor

http://www.battleoftheimports.com/classes/battlecalc.htm

i know it wont be exact but it is close

and 400 hp from a 2500 lbs car (celica) does the 1/4 in 10.7 (acording to the website)

a 400 hp car from a 3500 hp car (mustang v-8) does in in about 12 seconds


[Linked Image]
i've been changing but you'll never see me now
now i'm blaming you for everything

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 528
Senior Member
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Senior Member
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 528
that doesn't take into account things like the launch, RWD vs. FWD, etc. If the Celica is still FWD it'll have a hard time putting that to the ground on the launch, while the Mustang won't have as hard a time.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
not gonna read through 3 pages so If this has been said then sorry lol

400 hp vs 400 hp is a stupid arguement to begin with. You might as well argue which weighs more a ton of feathers or a ton of bricks. in the end it's still a ton.

now 8 vs 4 cylinders doesnt matter. 400 hp is 400 hp.

now the who will win a race will be decided by the following OTHER factos which need to be included in the arguement to make it a valid discussion.

1) are we talkin RWD, AWD, FWD?
2) what kinda torque does each car have?
3) what gearing and transmission does each car have?
4) whats the weight of the car?
5) are we talking N/A or turbo power? (elevation would affect a N/A motor more then F/I)

then you'll have to take into consideration driver skill. All you can do with the question you asked is hear opinions. and in the end it will come down to a real race to determine the outcome. It's the only way to know. even then the next race could come out different.


Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,612
2low2slow
2002 Toyota Celica GT
2low2slow
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,612
^word up, same with the powerband talk, if the driver knows how to drive it right and keep it in high revs it shouldnt have a problem with keeping on a low end powered car. i think the celica could take it, being its lighter then if you had a 400 hp street interior celica vs 400 hp street interior stang. the fwd i believe loses LESS power in the drivetrain but i could be wrong.


[Linked Image]
A boats a boat, but the mystery box could be anything....Even a boat!

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks euroboygt, I wish it was that easy. That would be great.

Thanks renfield90.

Thanks Lucky_317,
No problem. You don't have to read all three pages. You're more than welcome to tell me your opinion, even it has been said. In fact, if you did try to read it all, you would fall asleep because iggy and I got off topic and talked about the girls that have dumped us before. That went on for about a page.
Anyway, you're the first one to say 400hp is 400hp. Sorry, I didn't think it was a stupid question. Since the two engines are so different. You will have to excuse me, I'm not very bright and will be asking more stupid questions in the future. So if you see me ever start another topic, you might as well just figure "Oh shit, not this dumbass with another stupid question". Sorry.

Thanks eric_h.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 1
C.E.L.I.C.A. = Car Every Lady Intrigues Captivating Alot
makes no sense, but the abbreviation makes it good

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks for telling me it made no sense stefanic because I was feeling really stupid trying to figure out what it COULD mean. Good try though.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
One more question on top of all my other questions.
This is how my turbo kit is being done right now. Does anybody see a problem with the way this is set up? Performance wise?
1953365092-1953306126-1953304667-p129563_image_large.jpg

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
2
1953365095-1953304670-p129557_image_large.jpg

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
3
1953365099-1953304669-p129560_image_large.jpg

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
So there is a few questions I'm still trying to figure out..

1. Is a 400hp V8 the same as a 400hp 4 cylinder?

2. How do we increase the top speed of our cars?

3. Is this a good way to set up a turbo for performance?

Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
Originally Posted by iggy
The weight will make a ton of difference for sho, tires, rear wheel drive, all wheel drive, transmission, this thread is going to be fun thumbsup

Mustang = ugly thumbsdown rofl j/k some are nice spineyes
Celica = Hot tasty

i no longer have my celica...bought a mustang instead to haev as a dailt driver..lol
so OUCH. hehe

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by SKOOF
Originally Posted by iggy
The weight will make a ton of difference for sho, tires, rear wheel drive, all wheel drive, transmission, this thread is going to be fun thumbsup

Mustang = ugly thumbsdown rofl j/k some are nice spineyes
Celica = Hot tasty

i no longer have my celica...bought a mustang instead to haev as a dailt driver..lol
so OUCH. hehe

Hahahahah read it some are nice lmao rofl


[Linked Image]

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
just get the race setup and tell us the out come but this does come down to the torque figures more than anything else in the engine


respect the gt-s

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
eric...the way to increase the top end is through the c2 tranny...he posted on the other site about it...gears 1-4 are straight cut, adn the same gearing as the GT original 5 speed, but 5th and 6th gears are open...he had it built this way because he could ONLY hit 270 km/h, and had a lot more juice left...pm him or go to the other site...or shoot them an email on their site...last time I talked to him I was left to understand that this is the way it is setup

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
celicadragon, it's going to be a few more months before I can take him on. My car is about to come out of the shop with the turbo, but I have to save up some more money over the next few months before I pull the engine and do the internals. I won't be able to beat a built Mustang with just a turbo. Just trying to learn all I can until then.

Thanks Steve, I'll look through his site and see if I can learn something about his tranny, because I don't know what that means when you say "5th and 6th gears are open" I'll have to ask him what his top speed is too. I'm really curious now.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
I'm sorry but unless you're spending a crap load of money on full internals and some awesome tuning you arent gonna have 400 hp when you're car is out. granted I dont know what setup you're running but I would be willing to bet you wouldnt dyno 400 whp.

since you didnt listen to my first post heres the easy breakdown.

So there is a few questions I'm still trying to figure out..

1. Is a 400hp V8 the same as a 400hp 4 cylinder? YES. 400hp = 400hp so doesnt matter how ya get there.

2. How do we increase the top speed of our cars? get more power. this is an easy one.

3. Is this a good way to set up a turbo for performance? I'm guessing you dont know much about performance. you're tuning on the kit will be more important then the placement. If you trust the shop to do the work then you should trust the way they are installing it.


Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks Lucky_317,
I WILL be spending a crap load of money. So far I have about $60,000 into it and I'm only about half way done with this project.
I did listen to your first post and I appreciate your input. I just like to get everybodies opinion too. That's why I still ask. Plus I'm just really bored sitting in this damn country for a year. That's why I bug you guys so much. The guys in my platoon sure as hell don't want to sit around and talk about Celicas.
You're right about me not knowing much about performance. Thank you for pointing that out. My brother calls me Wax Boy, because that's all I know how to do to my car.
I know the placement of the pipes is not important. Just want to make sure everything is perfect. I do trust my shop, but I think the experts on here might know some things about our car that they don't.
I hope you didn't think I was being a jerk when I replied to your last post. I was just kidding around with you. Sorry if it wasn't funny to you. Thanks again for your post.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
so, if I read that right you've spent $60,000 on a celica GT for just a turbo? I'd really like to see a break down of what you're putting in there cause for that much money you could buy 2 GT's + push one up over 300 whp and prolly still have some left over.


Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
No, it's a show car. The engine is just part of what I have spent.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
I posted my mod list at the bottom of page one in this topic.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Lucky, 400 HP V8 is not the same as 400 HP on a 4 cyl, if you read my prior posts, you'd know why.

I don't care if you mislead yourself, but don't mislead the other users on here, torque plays a huge difference in the acceleration game, and the powerbands are completely different between an inline-4 and a V8 engine.

First off, you have twice as many slugs firing off in a v8 than an inline four, that's double the mass slinging around in the engine. A v8 only needs to work half as hard to make the same power as a 4-cyl with an identical HP rating.

Now, if you have a 4-cylinder engine, and a comparable 8-cyl, you may reach 400 HP on that 4-cyl engine, but you don't get that 400 HP until you reach about 8K RPM, on a V8, you'd reach peak power at about half that, around 4K RPM.

Double the pistons also give more torque. Say you want to do a burnout in that 4-cyl car, you have to rev the motor higher than normal, and dump the clutch to break the tires loose. Most V8 cars can break the tires loose a lot easier, most auto v8's can smoke the tires from a stand-still in first gear.

Tourque is the measure of how much force is turning the drive wheels. As an example, let's use a jar with a stubborn lid, you may be strong as an ox, but unless you apply ample torque to the lid to get the seal to break, you won't be able to open that jar. 4-cyl engines are like handing the jar to a little kid, while the V8 is like handing the jar to a bodybuilder.

Only drawback is wheel spin, but, if you can contrl the wheel spin, and get the tires to hook by throttle control, a proper burnout to get the tires sticky, and adding an LSD (Known as a posi to the musclecar guys) that car will launch and reach it's top speed a lot sooner.

Boost is irrelevant since you can add forced induction to the v8 as well, and for less money to boot, so the turbo option is a moot issue.

To conclude, here's the cliffs notes:

4-cylinder

pros: Lighter in weight,More fuel efficient, and can rev higher. Takes well to turbocharging.

cons:

Works twice as hard to make the same HP, takes longer to achieve peak HP and torque, torque numbers are pretty low to begin with. Doesn't take well to supercharging. Wears quicker under boost.

V8 Engine:

Pros: Produce peak HP and Torque much sooner, works half as hard as a 4-cyl. makes more power from the factory, modification is inexpensive, and takes well to supercharging. also, solid construction handles boost and nitrous like a dream.

Cons: Not nearly as fuel-efficient, redlines lower (usually around 5-6K Rpm, depending on the engine) heavier in weight than most 4-cyls, and turbo is not the best option (due to turbo lag + short rev range)


Sure, you can build a fast 4-cyl, but it will take twice as much modification and lots of cash when compared to a V8 build. It's also not nearly as fun in a straight line.

Most musclecars handle like junk, but in a drag race, there's no replacement for displacement!

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Quote
I don't care if you mislead yourself, but don't mislead the other users on here, torque plays a huge difference in the acceleration game, and the powerbands are completely different between an inline-4 and a V8 engine.
You make it sound as if one powerband is a circle and the other is a square. That's true that the torque curves are very different, but the power curves in the relevant rpms of a drag race can be very similar between the V8 and I4. badceli is not asking about a street race. He wants to know about a drag race on a track. You can mention the low-end torque of the V8, but: If it doesn't help in winning, it doesn't mean a thing. I'm not saying there isn't a time when the torque is useful for the V8. I'm saying you are wrong by saying this (from your earlier post):
Quote
You can crunch the numbers all you want, but when it comes down to it, the V8 will own you 9 times out of 10, due to the fact that the V8 will have double the displacement, and gobs of torque throughout the powerband. Also keep in mind that V8 will start making power low in the revs, and reach peak power a lot sooner, due to a shorter rev range.
does this apply in a street race or on a track? you will say it doesn't matter I know. I will take care of your statement: "a V8 WILL...reach peak power a lot sooner." what do you mean by "a lot"? 4000 rpms? 3000 rpms? You make that known here:
Quote
Now, if you have a 4-cylinder engine, and a comparable 8-cyl, you may reach 400 HP on that 4-cyl engine, but you don't get that 400 HP until you reach about 8K RPM, on a V8, you'd reach peak power at about half that, around 4K RPM.
Wrong. Just in case you try to take this back later, I will reiterate what you are saying so people don't forget. Basically: "The V8 makes peak horsepower at about half the rpms of where the I4 makes the same peak horsepower." You are passing this off as truth. You can reply before I make my full post, but I should caution you.

Also:
We've already established that both cars have 400 hp as the title of the thread indicates, so there's no need to talk about such and such being cheaper or easier to make faster. That wasn't the question.

But overall I liked your comments, for example:
Quote
You need to look at car specs when thinking about building a car to take on a V8, don't look at peak HP numbers, because that's just the PEAK power, you need to check a dyno graph; does the car make 400 Peak HP? Where is it making that power?

That is VERY good advice. grin


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,612
2low2slow
2002 Toyota Celica GT
2low2slow
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,612
either way in a drag race its always power to weight which has the most impact


[Linked Image]
A boats a boat, but the mystery box could be anything....Even a boat!

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
That is right. The point of others already having mentioned gearing and torque (affecting average hp) is that those things play into the NET effect of POWER. Yes when people calculate POWER to weight ratios to determine ET's, they use peak power, but as we know that calculation is not that accurate b/c of the reasons mentioned above.

Among two cars with the same peak power and equally skilled drivers, it is true that in some cases the heavier car can win because of net power considering all of the factors mentioned. Throw in RWD and FWD traction issues and races can get even closer.


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396
Originally Posted by QTRMLR_1
That is right. The point of others already having mentioned gearing and torque (affecting average hp) is that those things play into the NET effect of POWER. Yes when people calculate POWER to weight ratios to determine ET's, they use peak power, but as we know that calculation is not that accurate b/c of the reasons mentioned above.

Among two cars with the same peak power and equally skilled drivers, it is true that in some cases the heavier car can win because of net power considering all of the factors mentioned. Throw in RWD and FWD traction issues and races can get even closer.

:werd:


Controlled Inertia
President
8.831 @ 79.8 mph (best 1/8 new motor 12/02/04)
2.007 (best 60')
All motor

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Okay QTRMLR_1, I'm tired of waiting to see if Rave669 will respond. I would like to see what you came up with on this.
Would you mind?

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Then I'll let it slip to the back pages.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 343
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 343
Any monkey can drag race, circuit racing is where it's at. It's just my opinion but a 400hp fwd 4 banger would be awesome, racing engines live in the high revs(*). I think this is where VVTL-i will be your best friend and with dominate v-8's(*). This is all my opinion thou.

*:Unless the v8 has some funky gearing that takes advantage of low range torque.


[Linked Image]
Airman First Class

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Originally Posted by Rave669
Lucky, 400 HP V8 is not the same as 400 HP on a 4 cyl, if you read my prior posts, you'd know why.

I don't care if you mislead yourself, but don't mislead the other users on here, torque plays a huge difference in the acceleration game, and the powerbands are completely different between an inline-4 and a V8 engine.

rofl apparently YOU are the one who needs to read previous posts. I already stated my thoughts on this and I'm not about to repeat myself.

SO, do everyone a favor, read back through this thread and then see how rediculous your post is smile thumbsup nice try though happywink


Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
here in case you missed it I posted on this page

https://celicahobby.com/ubbthrea...part=3&vc=1

help ya out a bit rolleyes


Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
The person asking the question does realize only a real race can determine the answer, but is seeking a theoretical answer at this time. I will attempt to answer the theoretical question to the best of my ability.

To best predict the outcome of the race in question: a 400 hp 1996 Mustang (V8) vs a 400 hp 2002 Toyota Celica GT (I4) we must first outline the predominant factors concerning each cars performance in the quarter mile.

For the sake of comparison, we will assume 400 hp is at the wheels since the drivetrain losses of RWD are greater than FWD.

I. The Predominant Factors are:

1. RWD vs FWD Launch.
2. Gearing.
3. Relevance of Torque/Average hp
4. Weight.

We shall end with a race winner prediction:

Assumptions:

The person asking the question has stated we shall have equal drivers in our theoretical consideration.

Considering the 400 whp goal we shall make the following engine assumptions:

Mustang:
If the 96 Stang is a GT, then the owner will do the 2V to 4V conversion, functionally-wise making it a 96-98 Modular 4.6 L 4V (DOHC), that the 96-98 Cobra had. If the 96 Stang is not a GT, then it must be a Cobra. So the we will assume the owner has the Mod. 4.6 L 4V as the basis for achieving the hp goal. We will assume the owner will choose a centrifugal-type supercharger such as Vortech or ProCharger.

Celica:
The owner will use the 1ZZ-FE and turbocharge it. The engine will be built with MWR internals and will use the GReddy e-manage, along with C2Gass ecu mod to remove the stock rev limiter. The owner at a later time may switch to the Apexi PowerFC.

I. Predominant Factors:
Lets examine the extent to which each factor affects the cars in consideration:

1. RWD vs FWD Launch.

Assumptions: Since we have equal drivers, this means that each driver is experienced and skilled enough to drive each system to its greatest potential. We will assume each car has the best possible suspension setup for launching.
We are assuming optimum track conditions for both drivers, and by this we mean optimum conditions in each lane.

RWD Mustang:
From extensive browsing of mustangforums.com , stangnet.com and fordpower.net , it has been determined that the exceptional drivers of 96-98 mustangs w/ the optimum drag suspension, are able to achieve 60 times of 1.5 - 1.6 s on Mickey Thompson ET Streets (the drag slicks of choice). The 1.5 s 60 is of course rare even among great drivers.

FWD Celica:
It is known in the Celica community that one most exceptional driver of a Turbo GTS has pulled a 1.85 s 60 on drag radials. Other highly experienced Celica drivers can pull a 2.0 s 60 on drag radials. We will assume that all of these experienced and skilled drivers can pull a 1.80 s 60 on M/T ET Drag (drag slicks). We will assume that the 1.80 s 60 time is readily obtainable on turbocharged FWD cars, utilizing electronic boost control and running on drag slicks. The support for this assumption is in the thousands of runs made by stock-bodied FWD cars pushing 400+ whp via F/I. The 60 of 1.80 s is a conservative number as FWD turbo cars weighing 3000 lbs have reached as low as a 1.5 s 60.

In terms of the launch:
We shall estimate that the ˜96 Mustang will have a .2 - .3 sec advantage over the ˜02 Celica.

2. Gearing

The ˜96 Mustang comes with the T-45 5-speed transmission. Besides having unfavorable gearing it wont last long transmitting the large amount of torque that amounts to 400 hp. In order to compete with the gearing of the Celica we shall discuss, the owner must swap to the 2000 Mustang Cobra R T-56 6-speed which has the following gear ratios:

2.97/2.07/1.43/1.0/0.8/0.62

(Note that we are giving the Mustang the best possible chance against the Celica in terms of gearing, since it is likely the Mustang owner will only be able to obtain the 2003 Tremec T-56 transmission with ratios: 2.66/1.78/1.30/1.00/.80/.63)

The 96 Mustang comes with a measly 3.08 final drive ratio. We shall assume the owner to upgrade to a final drive ratio of 4.30 recommended by serious mustang drag racers who use N/A or F/I.

The Celica owner will use the C2Power 6 speed tranny for the Celica GT.
The gear ratios are as follows:

2.909/2.07/1.529/1.12/.884/.70 and final drive ratio of 4.312.

Conclusion:
The gearing will be similar between the two cars. The Celica does have the advantage in critical 3rd gear with the ratio of 1.529 to the Mustangs 1.43. And there is a Celica advantage in 4th of 1.12 to the Mustang 1.00 . 6th gear is also different, but that is irrelevant in the quarter mile.

3. Relevance of Torque/Average hp:

Lets clarify some concepts:
Torque is the twisting force developed at the crank by the power strokes of the cylinders at a certain rpm. Torque is directly related to an engines volumetric efficiency or VE at a certain rpm. Volumetric efficiency is a measure of how well an engine is able to fill and discharge its cylinders with air and fuel. The greater the VE the greater the force imparted on the pistons by the ignited air/fuel mixture, leading to more torque on the crank. Many factors influence VE, and it is possible to increase VE by using Forced Induction (F/I). The higher an engine revs the less air it is able to take in and discharge on each 4-stroke cycle. This is why all torque curves trail off on the upper rpm range.
Torque is what is real and measurable. Dynamometers measure torque and calculate horsepower. Power or horsepower is a concept. It is a concept of work output over a certain amount of time. Or from another perspective it is the amount of energy put into the cars motion over a certain amount of time. It is the horsepower curve that is the best description of how well a car accelerates. Torque matters because that is the measurable force we use to calculate horsepower. We also learn much from the torque curve of an engine as it indicates the engines volumetric efficiency according to rpm, and this info is useful for tuning purposes. And more peak torque generally means more low-end horsepower.

Horsepower = (Torque x RPM)/5252

The 5252 is the factor to make everything ends up correctly in the right units.
Torque units is in lb-ft.

V8s make a tremendous amount of low-end torque compared to their I4 counterparts. Keeping peak horsepower constant, more torque on the low-end does increase average horsepower for a certain car. However, when determining whether a V8 or an I4 will win a quarter mile drag race, we must look at the torque and horsepower curves of each car to see what significance the difference in torque has between the two cars with the same peak horsepower.

For our examination:
We will use a dyno-chart of Brett Slones supercharged 97 Mustang Cobra putting out 394.54 whp and 359.70 wtq.
We will use a dyno-chart of the MWR turbo 1zz-FE engine putting out 384.4 whp and 309.4 wtq.

The 1zz-FE is from the shop MR-S, but we shall deem that acceptable since we are considering the torque and power characteristics of the engine and not the launching characteristics of the RWD MR-S. We shall assume that this turbo 1zz-FE in the Mid-engine RWD MR-S will perform the same on a dyno as in a Front-engine FWD Celica.


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
The dyno-charts:
1st we have the supercharged '97 Mustang Cobra.
Feel free to print them out or open them in a separate window for quick reference.
1953384335-97 Mustang Cobra Supercharged.gif


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
The turbo 1zz-FE.
1953384340-1zzDynochart.JPG


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
We will examine the power level of both cars during each phase of a drag race.
(Note that the term redline shall be assumed to mean the shift rpm).

Launch Power

We have already made predictions as far as the 60 time of both cars, giving a .2 - .3 sec faster advantage to the mustang. The launch times discussed so far are mainly determined by driver skill, drive system, and traction (track, tires, burnout-also a skill). But as soon as the tires hook, the power made in launch rpms determines which car accelerates faster coming out of the 60. So lets examine the power output of the cars during the launch phase and also the run to redline in 1st gear.

The Mustang driver will initially slip the clutch up from approximately 4000 rpm to redline at 6800 rpm. The driver will taper off the clutch slipping as the rpms rise.
At 4000 rpm the Mustang will put out 250 hp. At 5000 rpm the Mustang will put out 340 hp. Of course not all horsepower is being transferred due to some driver intended clutch slippage.

The Celica driver will drop the clutch from 7000 rpm to land at about 4000 rpm. At 4000 rpm the Celica will put out 145 hp. The Celica driver will quickly go half throttle to let the slicks immediately hook and then go on full throttle up past 4000 rpms to redline at 7400. Compared to the Mustang 340 hp at 5000 rpm the Celica will have put out 240 hp.

Between 4000-6200 rpm the mustang shows a 115 - 10 hp advantage over the Celica at respective rpms all the way until each car hits its powerband plane, with the difference becoming less the closer to 6200 rpm. This of course being the result of the mustangs greater low-end torque creating more horsepower.
( again, horsepower = (rpm * torque)/5252 ).


There is the fallacious stereotype that the V8 will make the same peak power at half the rpms of where the I4 makes that power. From the charts, this is obviously not the case.

The Mustang reaches its powerband plane at 5600 rpms. The Celica reaches its powerband plane at 6200 rpms, 600 rpms later than the Mustang.

Notice how the powerbands are fairly level. Although both powerbands contain peak hp values at differing points, for our discussion we shall consider them to be flat maintaining a constant hp throughout the powerbands.

The Mustang revs safely up to 6800 rpm, high among V8s.
The Celica GT revs safely up to 7400 rpm, low considering the higher revving I4s.

The length of both the Mustang powerband and Celica powerband is 1200 rpm.

The Mustang has the power advantage in the launch and in 1st gear in that it has a considerable amount of horsepower over the Celica between 4000-6200 (115 10 hp). The horsepower advantage does taper off quickly the closer they rev to 6200 rpm.

2nd, 3rd, and 4th gear horsepower:

The Mustang will rev to 6800 rpm in 1st and shift into 2nd landing at 4700 rpm according to the already disclosed gearing ratio. At 4700 rpm the Mustang makes 312 hp.

The Celica will rev to 7400 rpm in 1st and shift into 2nd landing at 5200 rpm according to the already disclosed gearing ratio. At 5200 rpm the Celica makes 290 hp.

In 2nd gear, the Mustang will rev to 6800 rpm and shift into 3rd landing at 4700 where again it makes 312 hp.

In 2nd gear, the Celica will rev to 7400 rpm and shift into 3rd landing at 5500 rpm where it makes 335 hp.

In 3rd gear, the Mustang will rev to 6800 rpm and shift into 4th landing at 4800 rpm, where it makes 325.

In 3rd gear, the Celica will rev to 7400 rpm and shift into 4th landing at 5400 rpm where it makes 330 hp.


To summarize the hp levels at the respective gear landing points:


-------Mustang----Celica
2nd------312--------290
3rd------312--------335
4th------325--------330


Note that the Mustang dyno chosen indicates 10 more peak hp than the Celica dyno.
Observing no hp spikes in the dyno chart of either car, we will assume that if the Celica were to have 10 more peak hp, the average hp in the powerband would be increased by 10 hp. Since we are considering the powerbands level and constant for this discussion, each car shall have 395 hp peak and the average hp in both of their powerbands shall be 395 hp.
We shall assign 10 more hp to the Celica landing points as well:


-------Mustang-----Celica
2nd------312--------300
3rd------312--------345
4th------325--------340


To recap, the Mustang landed at 4700,4700, and 4900 and note its powerband starts at 5600.

The Celica landed at 5200, 5500, and 5400 and note its powerband starts at 6200.

From the landing points to the beginning of the powerbands, we shall assume the curves are straight lines. Since the rpm distances to the powerbands are almost the same (900,900,700 to 1000, 700,800) we shall use the landing point hp numbers as rough estimations of average horsepower made before the powerbands. Although we could find and sum the area of a rectangle and trapezoid for each car in each gear in order to find the integral horsepower or total area under the curves, that wont be necessary for our discussion. Actually, our straight-line assumption benefits the Mustang perhaps unfairly since the Celica power curve has a distinctive hump leading up to the powerband. That would be more hp for the Celica we are not considering.

So if the two cars weighed the same:
In 2nd gear, the Mustang would pull slightly on the Celica, until both hit their powerband, in which the gearing is identical.
In 3rd gear, the Celica would pull hard on the Mustang considering the large landing hp differential and the already mentioned gearing difference with the Celica at 1.529 and the Mustang at 1.43. To compound the effect, the Celica hits peak hp 200 rpm sooner than the Mustang in this gear. To illustrate the effect of gearing, when both cars have reached 395 peak hp, the Mustang is putting out an effective 565 hp to the Celicas 604 hp.
In 4th gear, the Celica would pull hard on the Mustang considering the Mustangs 1.00 gearing versus the Celicas 1.12 gearing. Gearing considered in the powerband, we have Mustangs 395 hp to Celicas 442 hp.

In Conclusion:

The Mustang only benefits from its low-end torque in the launch and part of 1st gear. After that in 2nd, 3rd and 4th gear, the Celica has the clear advantage. But remember these results were qualified with the statement that the cars weigh the same. This is definitely not the case. So that brings us to:


4. Weight

The already hefty 96 Mustang with the stronger and heavier T-56 and with supercharger will weigh a minimum of 3600 lbs.

The Celica GT weighs approximately 2400 lbs from the factory. Assuming the owner does not remove most of his show equipment, we shall add another 200 lbs to bring us to 2600 lbs.

Just considering the weight to (peak) horsepower ratios we have a tremendous difference, with the Mustang at 9:1 and the Celica at 6.5:1 (smaller is better).

II. Race Prediction

Given equal drivers, it is clear that the Celica would be the winner. The Mustang launch advantage of .2 to .3 seconds cannot stand up to the overall power to weight ratio differential favoring the Celica.

The power the Mustang has coming out of the 60 in the low-end is offset by its additional 1000 lbs over the Celica. Down the track in 2nd, 3rd and 4th gear, considering gearing, average hp and weight: the Celica dominates.


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 148
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 148
wow frown...i am scared someone hold me cry

Last edited by BlueGTS; Dec 14, 2004 8:39am.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks again Mike. Got one more for you. If the MWR MR-S isn't sleeved and can still handle 385whp, then a 1zz that is sleeved with the big bore kit and built internals should be able to handle more than just a higher boost level. You would think it would be able to handle maybe 20psi or so and at least a 65 shot. What do you guys think?
I still have to go read about that 530whp Scion TC, I thought they said it had a 1zz. Not sure though.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
So far, here is the list of people who think the Celica will beat the Mustang..
1. AZZKIKR
2. Celicadragon
3. spaztikid
4. Stefanoc
5. QTaintsobad
6. EuRoBoYGT
7. REDDASHCELICA
8. eric_h
9. Death
10. Illusive
11. QTRMLR_1
12. Myself

Here are the ones who think the Mustang would win...
1. Rave669
2. renfield
Not sure who Lucky_317 thinks will win.

After reading what QTRMLR_1 just wrote, I am definitely convinced the Celica would take the Mustang.

So now here is what I'm going to do just for the fun of it. The Mustang owner we are talking about is here in the same camp as I am. I am going to get him to come on here and try to prove QTRMLR_1 wrong.

Sound like fun?

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
I like fun. thumbsup


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Now the question is win by how much? That's what the debate should really be about. thumbsup


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
I'd put my bet on the mustang. the RWD would put a hurtin on the celica off the line (done right of course) and te celica wont have enough of an advantage to over take it smile thumbsup


Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
that's after reading what I wrote?


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396
nice read qtrmlr_1

that seems to have taken a conciderable amount of time.



one part that would need to be calculated is the amount of gap the mustang would produce by the end of 1st gear and through 2nd gear, and if the 4 banger could make up that gap (in feet) before the 1/4 runs out.


another factor to slap in would be turbo lag, if we assume the 1zz has anti-lag software(not currently available) for consistant boost between upshifts then a few asumptions can be drawn, in addition to launching in boost from the 1zz.

but overall good write up


Controlled Inertia
President
8.831 @ 79.8 mph (best 1/8 new motor 12/02/04)
2.007 (best 60')
All motor

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
I'm a rebel grin


Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
QTRMLR_1,
Like my hero says..."It doesn't matter if you win by an inch or a mile, winning is winning". spineyes



I'm kidding of course. Please do not think I'm a fan of that stupid ass movie. That line just came to me when you asked how much the Celica would win by.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
badceli, you might think about getting perhaps one of the best boost controllers money can buy:

http://www.world-motorsports.com/tbc.htm


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
and it would certainly help you if the HydraEMS comes out and performs.

http://www.hydraems.com/ems-index.html


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,342
another thing that isnt necessarily 100 percent true is how your relating the power curve to acceleration...

when you dyno a car, your starting at a VERY low rpm in 3rd gear... so there really is no power down there for us...

when "the greatest" drivers launch their car, they launch at around 8000 rpm in the celi... so once they drop/slip that clutch, they're putting down gobs of power...

same thing with the mustang...



now if they were doing a street start the dyno curve would be a good estimate of when the power would kick in.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Damn Mike! $1080.95 for a boost controller?!! That thing looks nice, but wouldn't Greddy, HKS or Apexi do the job for a couple hundred? I'm kind of out of money for the year. I still have to sell my Jet-Ski just to get the Racing Harts I need to fit the APR kit.

And just to let you know, whenever I just log out in the middle of our conversations, it's because my hour is up in this internet cafe' and I have to go get back in line and sign in again.

So which boost controller do you recomend for a couple hundred bucks?

People keep talking about turbo lag being a problem, but they still haven't said if my 65 shot is going to take care of that.
I just hope I made the right choice with the Precision sc 32 turbo. It's good for 480hp, but will it hurt a turbo to push it to it's max limit? Another stupid question, what will be my whp if my hp at the flywheel is 480?

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
The ems you mentioned also looks good, but I already bought the Greddy E-Manage. Hope that will be good enough.

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 282
Member
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 282
Welcome to the world of wieght. lighter equals faster


Heaven is 8600 RPM's

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Quote
when you dyno a car, you're starting at a VERY low rpm in 3rd gear... so there really is no power down there for us...

right. look at the dyno. actually I heard most prefer 4th because 3rd gives a bit too high of a reading. The dyno torque reading takes into account gear ratio of the gear used and final drive ratio. So what if your acceleration is slow on the dyno when you start in 3rd. After adjustments (albeit maybe slightly inaccurate as mentioned above), torque measurement and power calculation should be the same despite the gear.

Quote
when "the greatest" drivers launch their car, they launch at around 8000 rpm in the celi... so once they drop/slip that clutch, they're putting down gobs of power...

I know that. The GTS drivers. You could do that also in a GT but not without upgrading the valves, valve springs. Besides: the graph I showed of the 1zz-FE indicated MWR went up to 7400, so I assumed around 7000+ was where the clutch drop should occur, unless I was given proof on a dyno e.g. that over 7400 was safe. That was my example. I worked with it.

Quote
same thing with the mustang...

I researched and accurately represented how the RWD Mustang drivers launch. They slip and taper off. The rpm they drop from won't be as high relatively for them since they slip.

Quote
now if they were doing a street start the dyno curve would be a good estimate of when the power would kick in.

again maybe you skimmed through my report. There's something you don't understand or maybe you didn't understand my presentation.


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Quote
People keep talking about turbo lag being a problem, but they still haven't said if my 65 shot is going to take care of that.

yeah Illusive was right about how we'd be better off with anti-lag software I grant. But we don't know how bad or good things are until we try them, and then tune. A lot can be overcome and accomplished through clever tuning and clever solutions. If you're going to use nitrous and if you want the best tune, you'll want the NX Maximizer, the best progresssive nitrous controller right now.

http://www.nitrousexpress.com/Pages/Maximizer.htm

Of course software based nitrous control like through the AEM EMS or hopefully the Hydra EMS would be best. But you'll have to do a lot to hook up the AEM universal, and that will cost you.

Quote
I just hope I made the right choice with the Precision sc 32 turbo. It's good for 480hp, but will it hurt a turbo to push it to it's max limit? Another stupid question, what will be my whp if my hp at the flywheel is 480?

You probably did as long as it works well with all of the other parts, and it was installed right. Don't think it would hurt it if it really is a "precision"-made turbo, just some piping might blow off as it could be more likely. I'm not sure if anyone's determined the drivetrain loss in the Celica by measuring bhp from an engine dyno and then measuring whp from a chasis dyno. If I had to guess, maybe 410-430 whp depending on the dyno assuming SAE corrections have been made.


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks again Mike,
I do hate to get a half ass boost controller. I would wait and save up for the best one there is, but they are about to mold all my electronics into the dash and paint it. All this I have already paid for, just waiting for them to finish. So with all this work I have asked them to do is why I'm broke now. That's why I can't afford the more expensive boost controller and I can't do it later, since everything is about to get molded in.

Thanks for the tip on the NX Maximizer. Sounds like a good thing to have. Never heard of that, but that is something I can add later in a few months.

Okay. Thanks for your help. I'm going to leave you alone for a while. After I seen you go off on that new guy in the General Discusion forum when he asked about a turbo, I'm guessing your getting tired of all the stupid questions.

Maybe I'll start a topic and call it "Topics Not To Start" then we could list all the things we would not like new guys to start topics about, since they have already been done and are still in this site. What do you think?

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
^^ haha. No that was from before if you look at the date I posted that stuff in that General Discussion thread. I wasn't going off on him as it was supposed to be tongue in cheek humor tongue.

Are the guys who are doing the molding leaving space for a boost controller? possibly the profec e-01?


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Cool. I was afraid you were getting sick of all my questions too.

Yes, I still have to decide on a boost controller. If you say the profec e-01 is good one, I'll take your advise and email the shop to tell them to put that one in. All the interior work will be last. They are still in the middle of the turbo install. When that's done they will mold the GT300 kit on, then do the interior.

I'm going to go look at the profec e-01 really quick. I'll be right back.

Oh, I just got back from the Mustang guys office. This should be a lot of fun if he comes on here. You feel up for it?

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Oh, okay. I have seen the profec e-01. Yeah, that thing is the shit. I would love to have that molded into my center console below the DVD screen. I always thought that would be really cool, but wasn't sure if it would be worth the money. I didn't know if a cheaper one would work just as well, but it looks like that thing does a lot of shit that could come in really handy.
The question is, would a dumd ass like me be able to figure out how to work that thing?

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
What I would not do is just throw the profec e-01 in my car like this Civic owner did.
I think something like that needs to be molded into the dash.
1953386430-548191_3_full.jpg

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
right, you're going for show and performance. you'd want it in an easy place to reach so you can make adjustments from the driver's seat. I'm thinking...


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
yup.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by badceli
The question is, would a dumd ass like me be able to figure out how to work that thing?

it's just like a mini laptop that's all. you just need to understand fuel and ignition tuning concepts. But really those doing the tuning should be able to have it set up where you can switch to different boost levels whether you are driving on the street or racing.

now come on you're not a dumd ass. if you know how an engine works it's not hard to understand or learn about the tuning adjustments that are made. I'm sure you know how a turbo works, and if you don't it should be no problem learning. It's not rocket science.


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by badceli
Oh, I just got back from the Mustang guys office. This should be a lot of fun if he comes on here. You feel up for it?

I'm always ready. But if they don't bring anything good, I just get bored. I don't mean to sound cocky but just being honest. But it's all good as long as they don't insult me. That's when I let them have it.

There's a reason I took so long to write that, although I was really busy with a lot of other things. If I were in the military, I'd be the sniper.


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Yes, I know how an engine works...You put gas in it and it goes. Right? You mean there is more to it than that? Shit. I have a lot to learn. rofl

Last edited by badceli; Dec 15, 2004 5:50am.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
wtf rofl


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
The Mustang guy IS going to insult you and there is no way he will let you have the last word. You letting him have it is going to be were this get's fun.
He is a good guy and a good friend of mine, but he would never admit that a Celica could beat him.

As for you being a sniper, you must be in a lot better shape than I am. That's a damn hard school to pass. I couldn't do it.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
I ran a marathon in under four hours without much preperation for it. and I could still walk the next day haha so I guess I did ok. And I do love to shoot too. If I weren't so much into racing, I'd have a nice assault rife by now. But then again to my knowledge the closest 1000 yard rifle range is in Coalinga, CA which is several hours away. If I were still in Vegas, I could just go to the Boulder 1000 yard range. oh well.

at least there are tracks here in So Cal.


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Well sounds like you could make it through the school then.

And you are damn lucky to live in Cali. Cali is my home and I miss it.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
damn you still have this thread going Eric wooooot thumbsup


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Hey iggy! What's up man? Haven't talked to you in a couple days.

About this thread still going, you ain't seen nothing yet. The Mustang guy we are talking about is about to come on here and try to prove QTRMLR_1 wrong.

Now THAT'S going to be a show to see.

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 160
Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 160
I can't wait. I've followed this thread since it started. QTRMLR_1 you've made some awesome points. I'm with you. The Celica would win. Thanks for the awesome read. I've learned alot.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
woohoo mustang forever RWD > all grin


Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by badceli
About this thread still going, you ain't seen nothing yet. The Mustang guy we are talking about is about to come on here and try to prove QTRMLR_1 wrong.

Now THAT'S going to be a show to see.

seriously if he doesn't have anything logical to say it's going to be pointless. There'd be nothing I can do but roll my eyes. If that's all you see from me, then you'll know.

However, if he can provide a computer simulation running gearing, weight, and the exact power curve through the quarter mile (and also have inputs for a lot of other stuff like drive system launching and driver skill in shift times), and then show I was wrong, then maybe I would take him seriously. I believe a computer sim would prove me right.

BTW, I've been watching videos of Mustangs with around 400 whp weighing around 3400 lbs running at the track. So I have an idea of how fast they are. And these aren't amateurs who don't know how to launch or shift. And of course I'm comparing those times to MWR's time, also considering the launch factor, and the lighter weight of the MR-S.


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Well, I guess we will see what he comes up with. He's probably trying to do up a report like you did. He's not the kind of person to just say "My Mustang will smoke you guys" and not give us a reason why it would.

Lucky_317,
I'm was just curious if you own a Mustang or if you still have a Celica?

spectraGTS,
I know what you mean. I have learned a lot too, with this thread and the one about racing engines. I think if any new guy ever comes on and asks about engines or racing, we could just tell him to read these two topics.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
I love cars in general. Although I am an obvious fan of the Celica, I respect the Mustang and what it can do. As I spent a lot of time on the Mustang boards I liked the Mustang even more despite my reservations about its safety, handling, reliability etc. You can see that in many areas of the report I gave the Mustang the best possible advantage to combat any bias I may have. But I can't lie to myself. Theoretically with equal drivers, the Celica wins hands down. Now in real life, you know anything can happen.

For him to do the same thing would mean serious research on the Celica which would be unreasonable to expect of him. He may as well copy my report. I may have even found out more about his car than he currently knows. If he doesn't research the Celica and what it can be tuned to do with the proper parts in place, he will not give a fair prediction of the race, especially since we know what you are planning to do to your car.

At this point, if he were wise, he wouldn't say a thing.


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
no its actually a joke. I HATE ford with a passion. used to own one and had nothing but $hit happen from those people.

and yes I still have the celica smile It may irritate me cause I cant get enough power outa it BUT I love my little car. thumbsup


Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Damn good point Mike. He could have read your report already and decided this was a fight he could not win. I didn't even think about that. I'll make a trip back over to his office and ask him.

Same here Lucky,
I had a 69 Mach 1 and had nothing but trouble. I loved the car and it was my favorite until I got the Celica. Not sure how good the new ones are.
So what was your MOS?

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Mike,
Did I ever tell you how jealous I am of this picture? I would love to be able to do something like this in my garage.

You're 26 and it looks like you can take a Celica apart down to the frame, modify everything and put it all back together by yourself.

I would have to pay a shop if I wanted anything done to my car. I just realized that we never talk about the mods that you have done. Like...your exhaust control valve or water wetter. I don't even know what the hell those are.
1953388246-12628-3.jpg

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 160
Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 160
^^ DAMN!!! I'm jealous too!!! thumbsup thumbsup

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
haha thanks for being jealous tongue

Let's Play: "Identify everything in the picture"


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Tranny, CAI, drive line, axles, clutch, dics, flywheel, sway bar, red top and the rest I don't know.

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396
okay first off we have a cherry picker, floor stands, 2 floor jacks, C60 transaxle, some kind of short ram intake, front crossmember, hammer, optima redtop, right drive axle connected to hub, left drive axle connected to hub, exhaust manifold, shift fork and through out bearing, front and rear motor mounts, clutch disk, pressure plate, 2 front rotors, a front sway bar, subrame, some tie rods,

I was going to ask why you popped out the subframe, but realized you were probaby installing a new front sway, concidering your front suspention isn't stock, interesting choice for a mounting location for the chains, we usually use the front most bolt from the passanger side mount, and the tab behind near the exhaust manifold(which is the same one you used)

your garage is conciderably cleaner than teh one im used to working in :chuckles:

that looks like a good 4-5 hours of work right there.


Controlled Inertia
President
8.831 @ 79.8 mph (best 1/8 new motor 12/02/04)
2.007 (best 60')
All motor

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
yep got everything. thumbsup

that's actually a cut Injen CAI. I don't like how the short rams on the market curve around 180 degrees. and I only went with Injen since the curve to the throttle body is more gradual than a 90 degree turn. I know the MAF is not in the best spot, but I figured the PowerFC would take care of any adjustment that might be needed. I thought of getting a custom intake straight from the throttle body to the left fender, but that'd be too weird. And then there's the thought on rotating that now Injen short ram to the front to suck in air from a cut hood. But I already cut my stock hood and it wasn't pretty so I'm definitely not going to cut my carbon fiber one. I could use a scoop and have two scoops. But enough blabbering about best N/A intake configs. I think I'll eventually go turbo haha.

I dropped the subframe to make it easier to get my DC sports header in and tighten the bolts or nuts all up. I know I didn't have to, but felt like it. I was also able to get my rear motor mount out more easily to put in the Energy Suspension inserts. Maybe not a good idea since a couple of the 4 rack and pinion bolts took forever to get off and on.

If we take a look at the interior of my car, the name of the game would be:
"Identify everything NOT there!" grin


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
I knew I shouldn't have tried to guess what those parts are. Now I just feel really stupid.
So what the hell is an exhaust control valve and water wetter?

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1
exhaust control valve is just a throttle body like device in my exhaust pipe by which I can open or close the plate by way of a switch in the cabin. basically it lets me have a loud exhaust and free-flowing exhaust for performance and a quiet one with more restriction for low loads.

water wetter is just an additive to your water/coolant mix which is supposed to reduce engine coolant temps by maybe 20 degrees. The stock ecu should advance the ignition timing a bit and maybe give you more horses. I don't think my PFC will make any automatic adjustments according to ECT. anyways it's better to have a more efficient cooling system. controls temps and degree of knock. I should do a test to see if it really works...


I get my kicks on EC.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Mike, I have a job offer for you. A friend of mine and I are going to open a custom car shop in Killeen Texas. He already has about 80k to put down and I have a job lined up that will put about 70k in my pocket after 6 months. I am going to put that 70k into the building of our shop.

The reason Killeen is the best place to open a shop is because we do not have a good shop anywhere in our area and being next to the biggest Army post in the world, we would have thousands of car nuts that love to spend money on their cars. Once we have all their money, it will be time for them to move to another post in the Army and we will get a whole new batch of people with money to spend, but we will never over charge them for anything we do.

The reason it will be the best custom car shop ever built is because we know what people want and we are going to give it to them. People want to go to shop and have the guy at the desk be friendly and know what the hell he is talking about.
They want a one-stop shop that they can do everything at. We will provide that. You will be able to bring us a hunk of crap you bought at the junk yard for $50 and we will strip it to the frame and rebuild it from the ground up.

We will turn the old blown engine into a high performance racing engine, do all the body work, add a custom paint job, custom interior, custom sound system, chrome anything you want chromed and find the best deal on all parts that we can.

We are not trying to get rich off of this shop. We will sell every part and do every job for the least amount of money possible. We just want to do what we love to do, build custom cars.

We want to have the kind of shop that everybody has always wanted in their town. I think that once our shop get's going and the word gets out how good it is, we will then get customers from Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, Houston and all the small towns within a 4 hour drive of Killeen. We will not hire idiots. We have started our hunt to find the best people we can find that is a professional at what they do.

The reason this will be a great place to work is because my friend and I are not assholes. You need a couple days off...No problem. You're late for work...who cares, shit happens.
We do not believe in working weekends. Weekends are for having fun.
You want to trick your car out...no problem. What's ours is yours when you work for us.
Our shop will be a big happy family and we will have fun everyday at work. You will look forward to comming to work.

We will build a drag strip near our shop. Something we all want in our area. This will also be one big party with food, drinks, cars shows etc...And cost the people way less than any other strip. Again, not trying to get rich.

Anyway, I think you would be a great member of the team. Think about it and keep this offer in mind. It will always be there for you.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 873
seabass
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
seabass
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 873
exhaust control valve aka a exhaust cutout


hey thats a 20 minute phone call
"if i have seen farther it is by standing on the shoulders of giants"
derek: do you know that non dairy cream is flamable
Jennie: ...derek..what did you do

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 157
Member
1995 Toyota Celica SX
Member
1995 Toyota Celica SX
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 157
Originally Posted by badceli
No, my wife is not for sale. Neither is my motocross bike. THAT I will never give up.
Say, nice bike - T1000


When I find myself in a position like this, I ask myself what would General Motors do? And then I do the opposite!

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Thanks Clyde. What is a T1000.

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 35
Member
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Member
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 35
It's a quote from the movie "Terminator 2"

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
I should have recognized that. I liked the way he said that.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 908
this still lives rofl thumbsup


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,034
No, this topic is dead. The Mustang guy that was supposed to come on here and argue that a Mustang could beat a built Celica read QTRMLR_1's report and chickened out. I'm sure he knows that could not have won that argument.
So, time to let this topic slip away.

Lot of good information in here though.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Join the conversation - Register Now or Log In to add your comment


Link Copied to Clipboard
Member Spotlight
celica2kgts
celica2kgts
2000 Toyota Celica
New Hampshire

Posts: 523
Joined: February 2003
Thank you.: Myself and the whole eCelica crew! thanks! Kruz'n Kuztomz
Random: rollin on dubs baby
Show All Member Profiles 
Recent Topics
Hole in hose?
by Kacper9108 - May 11, 2024 1:26pm
P0420 with replaced catalytic converter
by Pevodj0 - May 8, 2024 11:50pm
2zz pcv valve
by D4ngerousbry - Apr 23, 2024 11:55am
Carcept front lip in 2024
by IM__ACE - Apr 21, 2024 9:05pm
Blitz / trial supercharger 2zz
by CheUK87 - Apr 19, 2024 4:09pm
Where to buy replacement dash?
by NeonCelica - May 27, 2023 11:38pm
Unsure if my problems are electrical or mechanical
by snoopdoge1998 - Aug 7, 2022 10:43am
2003 Matrix Xrs transmission in a 2004 Celica GT-S
by Maxime611 - Jun 10, 2019 6:55pm
Customize Your Toyota Celica Privacy Policy · About · Contact
Privacy Policy · About · Contact
CelicaHobby.com is an independent Toyota Celica enthusiast website. CelicaHobby.com is not sponsored by or affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. in any way. The Toyota and Celica names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.
© CelicaHobby.com, 2001-2024
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Preview build 20240506)