|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
Wow... I got my ECU back a couple days ago. Here are the stats before and after! Before - After HP: 180 - 204 0-60: 7.3 - 6.9 Top Speed: 140 - 156 The chip isn't cheap it set me back about $360.00... I think it is worth every penny! My next $250 will go towards getting the V-Force Power Control Module. Which is a 20mhz RISC microprocessor that optimizes the ignition spark advance and recalibrates the fuel map for optimum horsepower and acceleration. Also made by JET. With those two parts plus after I upgrade my fuel pump and ignition set up from stock to street I will ball park it at around 225 - 245 horsepower. ECU chip: http://www.nopionline.com/nopistore/dsp_...20Celica%202002 [ nopionline.com] Control Module: http://www.nopionline.com/nopistore/dsp_...20Celica%202002 [ nopionline.com]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
now watch in a week as your results disappear...poof! your ecu has detected something wrong and has re-set your settings to stock btw-we need to see a dyno.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977
Furi Kuri 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Furi Kuri
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977 |
sweet ass... Jet might be the only chip that will work for the Celicas. those are nice gains and seems to be more legit than the "chips" you can buy from ebay
I've mastered the art of the After Image Technique.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 253
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 253 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
now watch in a week as your results disappear...poof! your ecu has detected something wrong and has re-set your settings to stock btw-we need to see a dyno. I didn't Dyno I used my friends thing. It plugs into your grit lighter and mounts on the dash. It's like a 200 and some odd dollar thing he has. Very nifty! Also tells you your G-force durring turns and shit!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
so you used a jet chip and a g-tech to figure out your hp gains?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
Oh my god yes! That's a hell yeah! I drove home normally and when I left again that night I romped on it durring the on-ramp. I felt it pull a lot harder! I really wanna see what it will do if I upgrade my stock fuel and ignition set up!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
please let us know if you still have the same performance in a week or two...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 466
Senior Member 2004 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 466 |
I'm hoping to have faith in the JET ECU, if it does in fact work, so hope you can dyno your car. That's the only true way to determine if you gained anything.
Using the GTECH for HP readings sucks. But you said your 0-60 went down from 7.3 to 6.9, which is almost 1/2 sec faster. Did you test it on the same road and launched exactly the same? Otherwise you can't count on that being accurate either.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
so you used a jet chip and a g-tech to figure out your hp gains? I didn't use the "chip" to figure out anything. Just my friends appliance thing. I don't know the name but i'd be happy to let you know when he gets back from work.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
please let us know if you still have the same performance in a week or two... No prob! It's been 6 days now so i'd say around day 14 i'll check the stats again and let you know where i'm at! If i can dyno it i will!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
With those two parts plus after I upgrade my fuel pump and ignition set up from stock to street I will ball park it at around 225 - 245 horsepower. right... oh with a turbo? The PFC is the best and even with the best tuning and upgrades available so far, N/A people have not seen 225 hp at the crank. That may be possible with cams. But certainly not with what you listed.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
With those two parts plus after I upgrade my fuel pump and ignition set up from stock to street I will ball park it at around 225 - 245 horsepower. right... oh with a turbo? The PFC is the best and even with the best tuning and upgrades available so far, N/A people have not seen 225 hp at the crank. That may be possible with cams. But certainly not with what you listed. No way... i disagree and i guess the only way to prove it is when i dyno... ::sigh:: ...But then at least i will prove you wrong! MWHAHAHA! I will dyno with, JET ECU Chip, TRD Exhaust, DC Headers, Injen CAI, and Upgraded fuel and ignition! I will prove to the world that all motor celi's can get over 225! OVER 225 I TELLZ YA!
Last edited by Ryo; Jan 19, 2005 1:04pm.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
The PFC is the best and even with the best tuning and upgrades available so far, N/A people have not seen 225 hp at the crank. That may be possible with cams. But certainly not with what you listed. everyone knows this...but i want to give him a fair shake and see what happens.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
The PFC is the best and even with the best tuning and upgrades available so far, N/A people have not seen 225 hp at the crank. That may be possible with cams. But certainly not with what you listed. everyone knows this...but i want to give him a fair shake and see what happens. OH THANK YOU! And btw it was a G-Force Pro Performance Meter RR.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977
Furi Kuri 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Furi Kuri
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977 |
^^^ well, no one has tested the Jet Chip before, so we cant say for sure. yes i do know that most "chips" will be overridden by the ECU but you would think NOPI knows better than to sells things that will not work. But I do agree that without a turbo, he might not be able to reach or break the 225hp range. most likely if the jet chip and other product that is suggested works he can get to at least 210hp. we'll just have to see what happens.
I've mastered the art of the After Image Technique.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 427
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 427 |
Is the unit just plug and play? Is there any tuning involved?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
Is the unit just plug and play? Is there any tuning involved? No it is soldered on to my ECU. The V-Force Power Control Module is wired in some way considering it is a what it is.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337 |
let us know as soon as you dyno
respect the gt-s
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
^^^ well, no one has tested the Jet Chip before, so we cant say for sure. yes i do know that most "chips" will be overridden by the ECU but you would think NOPI knows better than to sells things that will not work. NOPI knows it works on certain cars...but i doubt it workd for ours. Check new celica...people were disappointed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
anyone want to put money down?
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
first you need a real dyno then you gotta tell us if the factory ECU slaps what you did outta the way and just goes back to normal
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 362
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 362 |
DYNO that bitch already!
Injen RD cai
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 873
seabass 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
seabass
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 873 |
jet repalces some of the ecu chips so it will not reprogram it self like it will with a safc or other piggy back unit
hey thats a 20 minute phone call "if i have seen farther it is by standing on the shoulders of giants" derek: do you know that non dairy cream is flamable Jennie: ...derek..what did you do
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 156
LNK 2001 Toyota Celica GT
|
LNK
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 156 |
Once said by a wise man..."i am too metrosexual for my own good"....you know who you are...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
jet repalces some of the ecu chips so it will not reprogram it self like it will with a safc or other piggy back unit THANK YOU! I thought so too but i didn't say anything cause i thought if i was wrong CT would eat me alive like his freaking cat stuffing his face. >>>Just playin' CT love the icon!<<< Anywho yeah i'm going to run the celi again for stat changes a week from now right before i install the control module and my fuel & ignition set up. After that is all outa the way i'ma dyno it. I might spring for flywheel and clutch before the dyno cause the shit ain't cheap and i don't wanna have to be back in there a month from then scartching my head wondering if the clutch did anything. Oh! Can't forget the AEM true power pulley!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 415
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 415 |
how's the clutch gunna improve your hp
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
I guess with all these extra buys I am springing for in a hurry cause I wanna break 225hp now, Santa is coming late this year!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 82
Member 2001 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 82 |
Read up about all the people having their oil pumps fail catastrophically while using aftermarket pullies before getting one yourself.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
how's the clutch gunna improve your hp Well gee i wonder... a lot of HP get lost in the drive train and tranny and never makes it to the black top. I'm try to help make sure all my ponys get to where they need to be!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
read up on how AEM pulley isn't like the other pullies noob so wait, this won't make the ECU go back to normal? hmmmm
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
Read up about all the people having their oil pumps fail catastrophically while using aftermarket pullies before getting one yourself. LOL! WOW! Yeah might wanna look into that huh?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
how's the clutch gunna improve your hp Well gee i wonder... a lot of HP get lost in the drive train and tranny and never makes it to the black top. I'm try to help make sure all my ponys get to where they need to be! yea you get a little torque outta it and hp best to do it with a lightened flywheel also.
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
read up on how AEM pulley isn't like the other pullies noob so wait, this won't make the ECU go back to normal? hmmmm DAMN SHOT DOWN! Owch i felt that one... I can work on Black Hawks but i guess a Celica is out of my league?! Yeah i always read on shit before i buy it. So, i'm sure i would have caught myself on that one anyway. But thanks for the info!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
how's the clutch gunna improve your hp Well gee i wonder... a lot of HP get lost in the drive train and tranny and never makes it to the black top. I'm try to help make sure all my ponys get to where they need to be! yea you get a little torque outta it and hp best to do it with a lightened flywheel also. That was the plan.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 822
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 822 |
well i hope it works despite the criticism. the PFC cost too much anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
and PFC don't work with 03 up GTS
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371
SHO - NUFF 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
SHO - NUFF
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,371 |
This thread is worthless without a dyno...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977
Furi Kuri 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Furi Kuri
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977 |
^^^ well, RYO told me that he sent his ECU to Jet where they soldered the chip onto the ECU. If the improved conditions last, they prolly did something else to the ECU. BTW, I plan on making some Chips for the Celica, anyone interested?
I've mastered the art of the After Image Technique.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
jet repalces some of the ecu chips so it will not reprogram it self like it will with a safc or other piggy back unit THANK YOU! I thought so too but i didn't say anything cause i thought if i was wrong CT would eat me alive like his freaking cat stuffing his face. >>>Just playin' CT love the icon!<<< we'll see... if you got a dyno (not a g-tech) and/or a timeslip (on a real track) in around 2 weeks then i'll believe it. too many people have tried this at new celica.org and it's been beaten to death...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
jet repalces some of the ecu chips so it will not reprogram it self like it will with a safc or other piggy back unit THANK YOU! I thought so too but i didn't say anything cause i thought if i was wrong CT would eat me alive like his freaking cat stuffing his face. >>>Just playin' CT love the icon!<<< we'll see... if you got a dyno (not a g-tech) and/or a timeslip (on a real track) in around 2 weeks then i'll believe it. too many people have tried this at new celica.org and it's been beaten to death... Damn you're giving me two weeks to do all of this? In a week i'll post if the ECU is still pushing. Give me 2-4 weeks for the purchase and install of the other parts and dyno. Shit i'm not superman... My wallet isn't that deep...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
well i hope it works despite the criticism. the PFC cost too much anyway. Thank you i'll be sure to thank you when all is over with!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 415
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 415 |
just wondering, but how did it know your top speed?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
jet repalces some of the ecu chips so it will not reprogram it self like it will with a safc or other piggy back unit THANK YOU! I thought so too but i didn't say anything cause i thought if i was wrong CT would eat me alive like his freaking cat stuffing his face. >>>Just playin' CT love the icon!<<< we'll see... if you got a dyno (not a g-tech) and/or a timeslip (on a real track) in around 2 weeks then i'll believe it. too many people have tried this at new celica.org and it's been beaten to death... Damn you're giving me two weeks to do all of this? In a week i'll post if the ECU is still pushing. Give me 2-4 weeks for the purchase and install of the other parts and dyno. Shit i'm not superman... My wallet isn't that deep... no...i meant do it after two weeks...and a run at the track shouldn't be too expensive...plus some dyno places go for around 45-65 bucks if you mees with the air/fuel ratio you'd want to dyno anyway rather than just put a chip and leave it be...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
I'll bump this thread in a month if I don't see it around.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
just wondering, but how did it know your top speed? 2am + 4.5 mile stretch + Celica = Finding Top Speed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
^^^ Honestly i'm not trying to sound cool nor would i recomend anyone to try driving at those speeds. The only reason i knew i could go it safely and get away with it is b/c i grew up in my town. I know it like the back of my hand. DON'T BE A DUMBASS AND TRY GOING 140 EITHER. Unless you have the driving exp and you know what your doing. No, watching TF&TF or 2F2F doesn't count as knowing how to drive. STAY SAFE! DRIVE SMART!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
just wondering, but how did it know your top speed? 2am + 4.5 mile stretch + Celica = Finding Top Speed from a stop? or a roll?...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 282
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 282 |
This thread is worthless without a dyno... I agree
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
to have 225 hp you'd have to be around 192whp. thats NOT likely also the g-tech is highly reliant on vehicle weight. and it gives you whp #'s NOT crank hp. so what did you use for weight? also if that is 204 bhp then you're at 174 whp assuming a 15% loss. thats average for most people having I/E only. so tell me again why this "chip" is so special????? I myself dynoed 170 whp with I/E and 185 WHP after the power fc. but hey if you're happy, that all that matters I guess. but until you get real dynos don't try posting all over the boards that this is the greatest mod ever. cause from what you've shown so far it's not worth $1 let alone $360
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
i wish my celica did 0-60 in 5 seconds
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
I wish mine did 0-60 in 4.5 seconds instead of 4.7
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476 |
I wish mine did 0-60 in 4.5 seconds instead of 4.7 You need TPR
TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396 |
you got yourself a nice expensive 360 dollar sticker.
I feel bad for you once you dyno 160-170whp.
Controlled Inertia President 8.831 @ 79.8 mph (best 1/8 new motor 12/02/04) 2.007 (best 60') All motor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
I wish mine did 0-60 in 4.5 seconds instead of 4.7 ah poop on you
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
When you say 180 hp and 7.3 0-60, did you get that on the g-tech or did you just take that from somewhere. Because obviously like lucky said, you have to enter your cars weight and it is only accurate if you put in the correct weight etc and that wouldnt be comparing anything if you didnt use the g-tech before the chip. I mean obviously you did not gain that much horsepower. What would be helpful is knowing if it does work without getting overrode though.
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,265
TheFilipinoCrew 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
TheFilipinoCrew
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,265 |
I wish mine did 0-60 in 4.5 seconds instead of 4.7 ah poop on you haha i poop on mike too...lol...i wish my auto gt was that fast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
Yes it is. However, it is only as accurate as the numbers you put into it. If you went to a weigh station and got your actual weight with you in the car then its one thing. But just punching some number in doesnt work too great.
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
accurate and precise aren't the same thing.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,233
black & blue 4 you 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
black & blue 4 you
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,233 |
so are we still waiting for the dynos
i've been changing but you'll never see me now now i'm blaming you for everything
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
accurate and precise aren't the same thing. Whats your point? Precise just means reproducible. If its accurate everytime (close to the actual value) then its going to be precise.
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
that is my point. you assume it is close to the actual value of say a dynojet. show me the proof.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
When you say 180 hp and 7.3 0-60, did you get that on the g-tech or did you just take that from somewhere. Because obviously like lucky said, you have to enter your cars weight and it is only accurate if you put in the correct weight etc and that wouldnt be comparing anything if you didnt use the g-tech before the chip. I mean obviously you did not gain that much horsepower. What would be helpful is knowing if it does work without getting overrode though. Incase you're spacing out those are the stock specs on a GTS and when i ran it before i got any upgrades with the g-tech guess what it said... 180hp 7.3 0-60.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
bhp, whp?...don't need to say any more.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 328
Member 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 328 |
i wud say the 180 is from crank..
it doesnt matter wat u drive or who u driving against its all about how you drive
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
does a certain person see the issue then?
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 89
Member 2001 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 89 |
180hp = stock crank
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522 |
^^^ well, no one has tested the Jet Chip before, so we cant say for sure. yes i do know that most "chips" will be overridden by the ECU but you would think NOPI knows better than to sells things that will not work. But I do agree that without a turbo, he might not be able to reach or break the 225hp range. most likely if the jet chip and other product that is suggested works he can get to at least 210hp. we'll just have to see what happens. How is the ecu going to override a new ROM that's been soldered onto the ECU in place of the factory one? Ever think of that? Yea, it'll override some piggybacks, but if you desolder the rom with the fuel maps and such, and replace it with a new one, there is no way in hell it's going to be overrided at all, you are essentially reprogramming the ecu altogether, you're not altering sensor signal voltage, you are changing the way the ecu itself operates. If it was going to override, it would've done it already, but since many of you just post the typical response, without actually reading his posts (which state what he did) you would get this fact. Problem is, chips have gotten a bad rep in the celica forums because of ebay jerkoffs selling resistors and selling them as "chips". This is not a true chip. A real chip refers to a new ROM with a new program, which replaces the factory ROM chip. ROM stands for "Read-Only Memory" which means it can NOT be overwritten by traditional means. You must use FlashROM for that, and only a specific piece of hardware called a "ROM burner" can clear and rewrite it. Most import ECU's do not incorporate the needed hardware to do this, so you need to physically remove the ROM, and either re-flash it on external hardware, or replace it with a new ROM with a different program. So, you need to send the ECU in eh? that's handy to know, this means that there is no external port on the ECU to install an external ROM. The reason you need to send it in for the upgrade is simple, they need to de-solder the actual ROMs and replace them with a new one. Some roms can just be swapped out, since they use a socket, other ECU's (like the ones on most domestics) have an external port, you simply plug the new ROM into the ECU externally. Nowadays, most ECU's can can be "Re-flashed" through the ODBII port (Look at things for domestics like the Hypertech power programmer), overwriting the factory program on the ROM with a new one. However, since toyota isn't being forthcoming with ECU specs, the only method that would work would be to replace the ROM by desoldering, and putting a new one on the board/soldering it down. This is clearly what has been done in this case. The V-Force has gotten mixed reviews for the celica, most of them negative, but then again, I suspect it would work properly if you swap the ROM out for JET's beforehand. I suspect you should get decent results. Only drawback is this: if you upgrade, say, add forced induction of some sort, you will need to change the ROM again, which means sending the ECU out again, to be desoldered, reprogrammed, and then re-soldered, unless of course JET had the foresight to solder a socket in place of the factory ROM, making future program changes easier. PowerFC is a good option for those who would change their tuning frequently, it has flashROM, and includes the needed hardware to re-program the roms with an extenal device. While the JET upgrade may actually be effective, major upgrades will require you to send out the ECU, which means more downtime. However, I would suggest to Ryo that he get an actual dyno run on the car, just to confirm the results. Sounds interesting, keep us posted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
does a certain person see the issue then? Are you talking to me? I don't own a g-tech so I probably shouldnt talk about how accurate (or reproducible lol) it is. I am just going by what everyone has said. If you are talking to me, I think we have been agreeing about it anyways as to how what you input into it has to be accurate and you cant be on a slope etc.
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
^^^ well, no one has tested the Jet Chip before, so we cant say for sure. yes i do know that most "chips" will be overridden by the ECU but you would think NOPI knows better than to sells things that will not work. But I do agree that without a turbo, he might not be able to reach or break the 225hp range. most likely if the jet chip and other product that is suggested works he can get to at least 210hp. we'll just have to see what happens. How is the ecu going to override a new ROM that's been soldered onto the ECU in place of the factory one? Ever think of that? Yea, it'll override some piggybacks, but if you desolder the rom with the fuel maps and such, and replace it with a new one, there is no way in hell it's going to be overrided at all, you are essentially reprogramming the ecu altogether, you're not altering sensor signal voltage, you are changing the way the ecu itself operates. If it was going to override, it would've done it already, but since many of you just post the typical response, without actually reading his posts (which state what he did) you would get this fact. Problem is, chips have gotten a bad rep in the celica forums because of ebay jerkoffs selling resistors and selling them as "chips". This is not a true chip. A real chip refers to a new ROM with a new program, which replaces the factory ROM chip. ROM stands for "Read-Only Memory" which means it can NOT be overwritten by traditional means. You must use FlashROM for that, and only a specific piece of hardware called a "ROM burner" can clear and rewrite it. Most import ECU's do not incorporate the needed hardware to do this, so you need to physically remove the ROM, and either re-flash it on external hardware, or replace it with a new ROM with a different program. So, you need to send the ECU in eh? that's handy to know, this means that there is no external port on the ECU to install an external ROM. The reason you need to send it in for the upgrade is simple, they need to de-solder the actual ROMs and replace them with a new one. Some roms can just be swapped out, since they use a socket, other ECU's (like the ones on most domestics) have an external port, you simply plug the new ROM into the ECU externally. Nowadays, most ECU's can can be "Re-flashed" through the ODBII port (Look at things for domestics like the Hypertech power programmer), overwriting the factory program on the ROM with a new one. However, since toyota isn't being forthcoming with ECU specs, the only method that would work would be to replace the ROM by desoldering, and putting a new one on the board/soldering it down. This is clearly what has been done in this case. The V-Force has gotten mixed reviews for the celica, most of them negative, but then again, I suspect it would work properly if you swap the ROM out for JET's beforehand. I suspect you should get decent results. Only drawback is this: if you upgrade, say, add forced induction of some sort, you will need to change the ROM again, which means sending the ECU out again, to be desoldered, reprogrammed, and then re-soldered, unless of course JET had the foresight to solder a socket in place of the factory ROM, making future program changes easier. PowerFC is a good option for those who would change their tuning frequently, it has flashROM, and includes the needed hardware to re-program the roms with an extenal device. While the JET upgrade may actually be effective, major upgrades will require you to send out the ECU, which means more downtime. However, I would suggest to Ryo that he get an actual dyno run on the car, just to confirm the results. Sounds interesting, keep us posted What it comes down to is if you will believe that this chip that is only 360 dollars will peform just as good or perform better than the powerfc which is 1000 dollars. I will believe this when I see it. The powerfc is a standalone unit that is tuned for your car. The JET is just put onto the stock ecu. But yeah, get that dyno and if I am wrong I will gladly admit it.
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522 |
I own a Vector performance meter, they're very accurate if set up correctly.
Of course, if you don't input a proper HP correction factor, it will usually give you the wheel HP, the base configuration on most performance meters usually doesn't account for parasitic loss from the drivetrain, aerodynanic drag, etc.
I have my meter calibrated to give me crank HP numbers personally, there's about a 15% drivetrain loss on an auto GTS, and about 8-10% loss on a manual tranny.
you definitely want to make runs on as level a surface as possible, but of course, most dynos don't include factors like rolling resistance, wind resistance, etc. So in some cases, a performance meter is more accurate, rather than less.
Some dynos are more accurate than others. You can always make a dyno run, and use the results to dial in a performance meter, which will help make readings more accurate.
Of course, the best thing to do is to make multiple runs, and average the difference. this is the best bet with either a dyno or performance meter.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 908
Senior Member 2004 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
2004 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 908 |
How about we just get a dyno.. and settle this
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 517
intoxicated 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
intoxicated
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 517 |
the website looks legit, it may be true, if you think of how many chips they sell at 400 bucks each it must do something
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
does a certain person see the issue then? Are you talking to me? I don't own a g-tech so I probably shouldnt talk about how accurate (or reproducible lol) it is. I am just going by what everyone has said. If you are talking to me, I think we have been agreeing about it anyways as to how what you input into it has to be accurate and you cant be on a slope etc. no, so don't worry about it man. apparently he hasn't figured it out yet lol.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 517
intoxicated 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
intoxicated
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 517 |
im really interested in just feeling a difference in power, but numbers would be sweet, the website shows numbers on a camry, but not sure if the ecu is similar, i know dude that had one on a 4.3 s10 and the difference was unreal
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
ok assuming 8-10% loss on manual tranny and he says he can at least get 225 hp at the crank with his original listing of upgrades...that means about 202.5 whp at worst.
Who wants to put $360 down that he doesn't hit 202.5 whp on a dynojet?
If he's right, he gets his JET paid for. If he's wrong, JET means "Just Empty Talk" (from the company of course).
Any volunteers?
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
let's wait for a couple of weeks and see if the butt dyno picks up that extra 50 crank hp...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 517
intoxicated 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
intoxicated
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 517 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,154
Specialist 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,154 |
I want something like the PFC for an 03
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522 |
What it comes down to is if you will believe that this chip that is only 360 dollars will peform just as good or perform better than the powerfc which is 1000 dollars. I will believe this when I see it. The powerfc is a standalone unit that is tuned for your car. The JET is just put onto the stock ecu. But yeah, get that dyno and if I am wrong I will gladly admit it. No, actually what it comes down to is the quality of the tuning. The factory ecu is more than capable of doing almost anything the PFC can do, after all, it handles all the same functions on our perticular application from the factory. The difference, other than price, is the fact that with JET and other major chip manufacturers, you need to fill out a worksheet telling them the engine specs, and they tune their ROM for the modifications you put down on the form, They'll ask abourt the cam profiles, compression, turbo/SC/nitrous settings, etc, and they tune based off of what you tell them, unless of course you take your car to their headquarters, in which case they'll tune the ROMs with the vehicle on hand. If you are off on the specs you submit to them, the tuning will not be optimal. Don't sell JET short; they've been making and distributing their ecu upgrades for ages, way longer than the PFC has been around. Their street chips usually use a base map, like the pfc, but they change those maps based on the mods you have. They also don't limit to one base map, since, along with the engine specs, they go off the ECU model number. Because hardware revisions of the ecu usually differ, the GTS may have as many as 20 or more different ROM sets between all the model years. Also, if they don't have a map for your ECU on-hand, Jet, as well as many other similar companies, will make one for you for free, just so they can add that specific hardware revision to their available application list. I'm definitely not knocking the PFC, it's a nice tool, the tuning is very flexible, and it has options for expansion beyond the factory ecu for additional sensors, injectors, etc. I am not disputing this fact, but some people do not need all the extra bells and whistles, and as far as I know, most people don't have a Dynometer in their garage, so the fact that it can be tuned by the end-user is lost on most people. However, for most tuners, they can get identical results from a ROM upgrade if it's executed properly, and it may even be more reliable. The one thing the Jet upgrade has over the PFC is that it's 100% ODBII compliant to the factory specifications, and is street legal in all 50 states.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298 |
What it comes down to is if you will believe that this chip that is only 360 dollars will peform just as good or perform better than the powerfc which is 1000 dollars. I will believe this when I see it. The powerfc is a standalone unit that is tuned for your car. The JET is just put onto the stock ecu. But yeah, get that dyno and if I am wrong I will gladly admit it. No, actually what it comes down to is the quality of the tuning. The factory ecu is more than capable of doing almost anything the PFC can do, after all, it handles all the same functions on our perticular application from the factory. The difference, other than price, is the fact that with JET and other major chip manufacturers, you need to fill out a worksheet telling them the engine specs, and they tune their ROM for the modifications you put down on the form, They'll ask abourt the cam profiles, compression, turbo/SC/nitrous settings, etc, and they tune based off of what you tell them, unless of course you take your car to their headquarters, in which case they'll tune the ROMs with the vehicle on hand. If you are off on the specs you submit to them, the tuning will not be optimal. Don't sell JET short; they've been making and distributing their ecu upgrades for ages, way longer than the PFC has been around. Their street chips usually use a base map, like the pfc, but they change those maps based on the mods you have. They also don't limit to one base map, since, along with the engine specs, they go off the ECU model number. Because hardware revisions of the ecu usually differ, the GTS may have as many as 20 or more different ROM sets between all the model years. Also, if they don't have a map for your ECU on-hand, Jet, as well as many other similar companies, will make one for you for free, just so they can add that specific hardware revision to their available application list. I'm definitely not knocking the PFC, it's a nice tool, the tuning is very flexible, and it has options for expansion beyond the factory ecu for additional sensors, injectors, etc. I am not disputing this fact, but some people do not need all the extra bells and whistles, and as far as I know, most people don't have a Dynometer in their garage, so the fact that it can be tuned by the end-user is lost on most people. However, for most tuners, they can get identical results from a ROM upgrade if it's executed properly, and it may even be more reliable. The one thing the Jet upgrade has over the PFC is that it's 100% ODBII compliant to the factory specifications, and is street legal in all 50 states. Hoooo shit i'm pretty sure you just got served!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
LOL. Actually NOT "quality of tuning". More like tuning in general. I don't call punching in numbers according to specs and descriptions tuning. You did say most people who get aftermarket ecu's won't get around to tuning, so even if they did bring their JET into headquarters to get tuned, I don't think these guys will spend hours on the dyno like Lucky and others have spent to get the numbers you claim you can get with JET.
something tells me JET doesn't tune the vvti with their number punching, and that according to Lucky is where he got the most gains with the PFC.
big deal on OBD-II. it's a 2 min swap between PFC and stock ecu. then wait a week or two and then go pass your smog test.
GReddy E-manage or Spilt Second is proven and clearly superior to JET, considering the method of operation/flexibility and also the similar price range.
Sure try it to be different. I wish I had money to burn just for the cause of being "different".
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
What it comes down to is if you will believe that this chip that is only 360 dollars will peform just as good or perform better than the powerfc which is 1000 dollars. I will believe this when I see it. The powerfc is a standalone unit that is tuned for your car. The JET is just put onto the stock ecu. But yeah, get that dyno and if I am wrong I will gladly admit it. No, actually what it comes down to is the quality of the tuning. The factory ecu is more than capable of doing almost anything the PFC can do, after all, it handles all the same functions on our perticular application from the factory. The difference, other than price, is the fact that with JET and other major chip manufacturers, you need to fill out a worksheet telling them the engine specs, and they tune their ROM for the modifications you put down on the form, They'll ask abourt the cam profiles, compression, turbo/SC/nitrous settings, etc, and they tune based off of what you tell them, unless of course you take your car to their headquarters, in which case they'll tune the ROMs with the vehicle on hand. If you are off on the specs you submit to them, the tuning will not be optimal. Don't sell JET short; they've been making and distributing their ecu upgrades for ages, way longer than the PFC has been around. Their street chips usually use a base map, like the pfc, but they change those maps based on the mods you have. They also don't limit to one base map, since, along with the engine specs, they go off the ECU model number. Because hardware revisions of the ecu usually differ, the GTS may have as many as 20 or more different ROM sets between all the model years. Also, if they don't have a map for your ECU on-hand, Jet, as well as many other similar companies, will make one for you for free, just so they can add that specific hardware revision to their available application list. I'm definitely not knocking the PFC, it's a nice tool, the tuning is very flexible, and it has options for expansion beyond the factory ecu for additional sensors, injectors, etc. I am not disputing this fact, but some people do not need all the extra bells and whistles, and as far as I know, most people don't have a Dynometer in their garage, so the fact that it can be tuned by the end-user is lost on most people. However, for most tuners, they can get identical results from a ROM upgrade if it's executed properly, and it may even be more reliable. The one thing the Jet upgrade has over the PFC is that it's 100% ODBII compliant to the factory specifications, and is street legal in all 50 states. Hoooo shit i'm pretty sure you just got served! No SLVCELI did not get served. Quite the opposite in fact. You served yourself. What's the saying? oh yes: "Birds of feather flock together."
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522 |
Nah, not serving anyone, just speaking on past experience with chip producers. The three big companies that do ROM upgrades are Superchips, Jet and Hypermotive. There are a couple other smaller comanies out there however, like Diablosport, that also make some decent ROM upgrades.
Far as I know, JET is the only company that can upgrade our factory ECUs. Superchips mostly does domestics, and Hypermotive has moved on to making Power Programmers (a tool that let's you program the factory ECU, similar to a datalogit, too bad they can't make one for our cars).
Diablosport may be able to upgrade our ECU's as well, but as far as I know, they haven't done anything with the ZZ family yet.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298 |
not really QT, there was no servage to myself, He indeed gave a good rebuttal to slvcelis remark, which was not entirely thought out first. So really...he still served him..and this thread should end anyways...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
oh well opinion's an opinion.
won't end until we get the dynos.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298 |
and dynos still dont prove anything so this wont really end
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
who told you that? sure they do. it's called baseline run(s) compared to modification run(s). on the SAME dyno with SAE corrections OR same time of day and similar temps/humidity if you still don't like correction factors. Before and After. That's how it is.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298 |
its called photoshop!, ive seen so many fake dynos lately ive come to thinking if you dont see it in person dont bother with it
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
yes yes credibility is always an issue...
ok, so maybe a video of the dyno computer screen might be better for those not in New Haven, CT. I'm thinking if he doesn't get the results, he won't bother to post. So that's another way it can end...dropping off into backpages...
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,298 |
yes, hopefully..whatever im done. I bow down before the almighty QTR...plz let this thread die
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
lol I've got another subject...
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522 |
PFC is viable, Jet is viable, there are MANY options that work, I just wish one in perticular <cough PFC cough!> didn't always consume the threads.
I like to know all the options, since PFC isn't really an option for me, it just seems to be that when anybody brings up an ECU upgrade other than the PFC, it just turns into a bash-fest, and nobody gets any facts on the matter.
Ryo, I appreciate you trying something new and sharing it with us. actual dynos would be nice, but I'm not forcing you to spend money on dyno time. I still want to hear results when you add the v-force into the equation.
Let's just play nice, this is a thread about the JET products after all, not the PFC. arguing here is counter productive.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
not really QT, there was no servage to myself, He indeed gave a good rebuttal to slvcelis remark, which was not entirely thought out first. So really...he still served him..and this thread should end anyways... You say that my remark was not thought out but did you even think before you posted this? Rave's comment was not trying to "serve" anyone. The whole point of me saying that the chip is not comparable to a standalone is because this chip is not tuned for your car. Period. Filling out a worksheet telling them the engine specs doesnt cut it. And since a lot of the things I think are common sense dont appear that way to some people; Say, for example, one person has the kazuma exhaust with the aem intake, and another person has the trd exhaust with tpr intake. Does JET have the tuning capability to set up the tuning for your car when there are thousands of performance part combinations available? Think about how different those mods will be at different rpms. This doesnt even take it account how all our cars will perform different or the countless hours that can be spent specifically tuning a GTS with the powerfc (with far more options than the JET chip) to yield less horsepower than what is claimed here.
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396 |
PFC is viable, Jet is viable, there are MANY options that work, I just wish one in perticular <cough PFC cough!> didn't always consume the threads.
I like to know all the options, since PFC isn't really an option for me, it just seems to be that when anybody brings up an ECU upgrade other than the PFC, it just turns into a bash-fest, and nobody gets any facts on the matter.
Ryo, I appreciate you trying something new and sharing it with us. actual dynos would be nice, but I'm not forcing you to spend money on dyno time. I still want to hear results when you add the v-force into the equation.
Let's just play nice, this is a thread about the JET products after all, not the PFC. arguing here is counter productive. actually there are a few "ecu" upgrades if you truely believe in jet I suggest you purchase a safc to compliment it.
Controlled Inertia President 8.831 @ 79.8 mph (best 1/8 new motor 12/02/04) 2.007 (best 60') All motor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
PFC is viable, Jet is viable, there are MANY options that work, I just wish one in perticular <cough PFC cough!> didn't always consume the threads.
I like to know all the options, since PFC isn't really an option for me, it just seems to be that when anybody brings up an ECU upgrade other than the PFC, it just turns into a bash-fest, and nobody gets any facts on the matter.
Ryo, I appreciate you trying something new and sharing it with us. actual dynos would be nice, but I'm not forcing you to spend money on dyno time. I still want to hear results when you add the v-force into the equation.
Let's just play nice, this is a thread about the JET products after all, not the PFC. arguing here is counter productive. You should have said that in the first place lol. If you wanted to hear that this chip was so great you should have just told me to tell you that j/p. The whole argument here was about the unrealistic horsepower increase. The reason the powerfc came into the argument was because he was saying the horsepower increase was more than what countless hours of tuning with the powerfc could net. I am hoping that this really does work as good as he says, especially for the dbw people. I am just confident that you will see that your argument was somewhat biased since you want this to work so badly. I have e-Manage and actually want this to work as well but I dont have a side on the matter. You know what I mean?
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
PFC is viable, Jet is viable, there are MANY options that work, I just wish one in perticular didn't always consume the threads.
I like to know all the options, since PFC isn't really an option for me, it just seems to be that when anybody brings up an ECU upgrade other than the PFC, it just turns into a bash-fest, and nobody gets any facts on the matter.
Ryo, I appreciate you trying something new and sharing it with us. actual dynos would be nice, but I'm not forcing you to spend money on dyno time. I still want to hear results when you add the v-force into the equation.
Let's just play nice, this is a thread about the JET products after all, not the PFC. arguing here is counter productive. Bash-fest NO. Truth-fest. Deal with it. Yes this is about JET products, and comparing it to the standard and the gains achieved with that is still discussing JET products...it's called compare and contrast. Futhermore, examining the operation of how JET goes about their so- called "tuning" is also discussing JET products. People mentioning the past results of others on other Celica or car sites is also discussing JET products. None of that is counter-productive but rather informative. FYI though there may have been a JET thread, I have not seen another JET Ecu thread on here since I joined this site mid last year. And I am an active poster on this site. That's right no one is forcing him if you imply some are. He's made some claims and he is the one who said he would dyno and prove it to us. I will dyno with, JET ECU Chip, TRD Exhaust, DC Headers, Injen CAI, and Upgraded fuel and ignition! I will prove to the world that all motor celi's can get over 225! OVER 225 I TELLZ YA! Let's see if he keeps his word about posting and is honest about it. Yes, unless we see the dyno in person, only God will know. Those are the facts you say that are missing from this discussion.
Last edited by QTRMLR_1; Jan 24, 2005 4:23pm.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
OK to be fair to the Maker, anything is possible. So perhaps if he prays really hard, the JET will be given powers GREATER than the PFC.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
OK to be fair to the Maker, anything is possible. So perhaps if he prays really hard, the JET will be given powers GREATER than the PFC. Just a crazy guess, but something tells me God isn't going to put a whole lot of meaning in this 'chip'
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
yes yes credibility is always an issue...
ok, so maybe a video of the dyno computer screen might be better for those not in New Haven, CT. I'm thinking if he doesn't get the results, he won't bother to post. So that's another way it can end...dropping off into backpages... Wow i leave my comp for a couple of days and all of a sudden everyone has something to bring to the table as far as opinon goes. I orded my new fuel and ignition set up and this thrusday i'm ordering my flywheel and clutch. I expect all to be installed by Feb 12th. So, WHEN I DO dyno b/c i know i will. I will let everyone know.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 60 |
^^^ well, no one has tested the Jet Chip before, so we cant say for sure. yes i do know that most "chips" will be overridden by the ECU but you would think NOPI knows better than to sells things that will not work. But I do agree that without a turbo, he might not be able to reach or break the 225hp range. most likely if the jet chip and other product that is suggested works he can get to at least 210hp. we'll just have to see what happens. How is the ecu going to override a new ROM that's been soldered onto the ECU in place of the factory one? Ever think of that? Yea, it'll override some piggybacks, but if you desolder the rom with the fuel maps and such, and replace it with a new one, there is no way in hell it's going to be overrided at all, you are essentially reprogramming the ecu altogether, you're not altering sensor signal voltage, you are changing the way the ecu itself operates. THANK YOU for the knowledgeable response! I was starting to doubt the upgrade cause i found myself being told it sucked from all angles. But thanks to you and a couple other people my faith in the product is strong. I tested it again with the G-Force and I'm getting the same readings. All is well with my Celi and I will continue on my quest to HAVE THE FASTEST ALL MOTOR CELI! Woot! I have a goal in life... I feel so special! ...no not in a short bus kinda way either... Any who I'll be sure to post when i get my new installs done all the way to the dyno and prolly even after cause I know I'm going to be proving a lot of people wrong so I'm going to have a lot of gloating to do!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
well good luck takin that record I can assure you it won't be an easy task. but if you managa to put down a better time, I'll be the first to give you props. just don't make the mistake of thinkin you don't have any real competition as far as the chip goes, I don't think a blind tuning will compare to a fine tuned power fc. also his hp goals and what he "thinks" he's at now are WAY off. there is no way that he put down 180 hp stock that was the most rediculous claim I've seen on this thread. 151-161 is the average spread for stock. 170-175 is average spread for I/E. there is no way he put down more then that stock the g-tech DOES NOT SHOW CRANK POWER. unless theres some setting you can change to make it say that lol
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
I expect all to be installed by Feb 12th. How's it coming?
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,029
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,029 |
he is busy enjoying the power he have.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
HELLOOOOO?!!! MCFLY??!!! ANYONE HOME?!!!!!!!...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,029
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,029 |
out enjoying his new jet celica
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
HELLOOOOO?!!! MCFLY??!!! ANYONE HOME?!!!!!!!...
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
just like we suspected. all talk no game.
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 916
Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 916 |
Post some Dynos & make us eat our words. I'm hungry.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977
Furi Kuri 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Furi Kuri
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977 |
you guys prolly scared him off
I've mastered the art of the After Image Technique.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
I see that Ryo is online now. back from JETting around. let's bump it up.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
10 bucks says he don't post...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
^^ I wouldnt take that bet
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
^^ I concur. $10 is a start to make up for that $360 sticker.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
I imagine this thread will get locked before we see a dyno.
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
^^ ditto, mike. i'll ibtl 4 now
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,093
Black Sheep 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Black Sheep
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,093 |
DONT LOCK! im dying to know.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137
C'mon & hit me! 2000 Toyota Celica GTS
|
C'mon & hit me!
2000 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,137 |
...wait...wait...i think i feel a dyno being posted...dammit..false alarm...i'm just constipated
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,093
Black Sheep 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Black Sheep
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,093 |
i got a semi errection, STOP TEASING!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
Q: "What is slower than a JET-chipped Celica?"
A: "The JET-chipped Celica owner."
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 983
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 983 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
Q: "What is slower than a JET-chipped Celica?"
A: "The JET-chipped Celica owner." now thats harsh.
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
how??? Forest can't run as fast as a Celica.
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 39
USMC 2001 Toyota Celica
|
USMC
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 39 |
dyno??????????????????????????????i thought he said hed have it by now???
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 380
Member 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 380 |
ryo and cr4sh got dynos at the same place
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 538
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 538 |
"I will be merciful.........and quick!"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977
Furi Kuri 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Furi Kuri
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977 |
We want an update!!!
I've mastered the art of the After Image Technique.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
ryo and cr4sh got dynos at the same place so does that mean the dynos sucked???? if he dynoed then why hasnt he updated this thread.
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
Alright lemmings. We already know it doesnt work or it resets itself. Over on the "other site" a gt owner with i/e/h and Jet chip dynoed at 128.9 whp and 114.1 wtq. Thats what they dyno with i/e/h so obviously the Jet didnt add anything.
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
it cant be reset it just isnt a good tune.
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,304 |
it cant be reset it just isnt a good tune. It just isnt a good tune or it doesnt work period? That dyno suggests it didnt add anything.
BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU COULD BE BETWEEN HOW IT IS AND HOW IT SHOULD BE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,241 |
they physically replace the rom so theres no way it can get changed. it simply has a generic tune thats no better then stock. IF it were done properly it could maybe possibly make power but never to the extent of a full standalone. IMO
Best 60' 1.959 best 1/4 - 13.7 @ 101mph
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,029
Specialist 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,029 |
any update??? we should all pitch in so he can do a dyno
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522
Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 522 |
Alright lemmings. We already know it doesnt work or it resets itself. Over on the "other site" a gt owner with i/e/h and Jet chip dynoed at 128.9 whp and 114.1 wtq. Thats what they dyno with i/e/h so obviously the Jet didnt add anything. Yes, that's a GT, I'm more interested in the GTS, I'm pretty sure JET could milk some more power out of the 2ZZ with a new ROM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 278
Member 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 278 |
ahh..ecelica.com..the place where noobs celica dreams are crushed daily...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 130
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 130 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337 |
my jet chip dyno'ed me at 800 whp now i can beat all you forced induction guys!
respect the gt-s
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,374 Likes: 1 |
Alright lemmings. We already know it doesnt work or it resets itself. Over on the "other site" a gt owner with i/e/h and Jet chip dynoed at 128.9 whp and 114.1 wtq. Thats what they dyno with i/e/h so obviously the Jet didnt add anything. Yes, that's a GT, I'm more interested in the GTS, I'm pretty sure JET could milk some more power out of the 2ZZ with a new ROM. hmmm that's right...lactating Celi, then JET sucks...
I get my kicks on EC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13 |
where is the best to upgrade my computer!? and what kind of alterations would it make to my car?
|
|
|
Joined: February 2003
Thank you.: Myself and the whole eCelica crew! thanks! Kruz'n Kuztomz Random: rollin on dubs baby
|
Show All Member Profiles
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|