|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 56
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 56 |
my 00' gt which has injen cai, trd exhaust, ur ss pulleys, hs 4-1 headers,and aerospeed performance ground wires. versus 98 v6 cougar with k&n short ram intake and 18's, versus 96 v6 camaro with a dual exhaust who do you think would win 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 71
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 71 |
Why would you post this in two different forums??  
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 56
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 56 |
because i no one responded on the other, and i wanna go soon
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
are the cars automatics? manuals? just a prediction if it were a 1/4 drag race:
1. camaro (by virtue of power, acceleration)
2. celica gt (4-1 headers & ss pulleys are N I C E)
3. cougar (decent car...but mercury leaves much to be desired)
again, theres so much that was left out its hard to make an accurate description (how many miles, condition of engine, if the 18"s on the cougar are chrome or alloys, etc...and very important...the manual/automatic trannys)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,424
King of the Hill 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
|
King of the Hill
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,424 |
they are all 5 speed manuals
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1
Caleb 2000 Toyota Celica
|
|
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,365 Likes: 1 |
then everything remains equal. if there were one or two manual and the other(s) standard then there would probably be some difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 56
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 56 |
funny the  camaro is the slowest one,
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,660
ECelica Staff 2001 Toyota Celica
|
|
ECelica Staff
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,660 |
V6 camaros aren't fast. I do not know about Cougars though. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110
05 WRB 2005 Subaru WRX STi
|
|
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,110 |
V6 camaros aren't fast. I do not know about Cougars though. Good luck. teh Cougar is slow as crap I thought... and the V6 camaro's I thought were pretty fast? hmm...idk then. 
SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 360
Member 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 360 |
I think it would be the Celi, camero, then the cougar. The Celi would have a lot more pick up off the line then the other two and the cougar isn't a very fast car anyway
|
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|
