|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13 |
Hello! I have one Celica GT, i want change my airbox.. what is the best solution? Cold Air Intake or Short Air Intake? Thanks Davide
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 797
Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 797 |
I've heard from pro's that they both give good performance, just that CAI will give you better performance on hot days while SAI/SRI won't. But on any regular day, they're about the same.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 304
Member 2002 Volkswagon Jetta GLS
|
Member
2002 Volkswagon Jetta GLS
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 304 |
there's a box at the top right... use it.. there are pros and cons for both search
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,744
CF Connoisseur 2004 Toyota Celica
|
CF Connoisseur
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,744 |
yea billion threads aobut it but here i'll sum up some pros and cons SRI: Pros= looks better in your engine bay IMO Sounds awsome because there isnt mucvh to it to block sound Get decent gain if you ahve a heatshielf with it (can get injen one fomr this ite i belive Cons= Not as great proformance increase as CAI Can suck in more hot air form engine bay that which coudl decrease hp if no heatshield CAI Pros= Much better proformance then SRI Better sounding then stock Guys who want more power will like you better Cons= possiblity of hydrolock (submerging intake in water making it go in engine, very bad thing, but need to go into a lake to have it happen ) Not as nice looking in the engine bay IMO So final verdict, if you want looks and sound get SRI. If you want proformance and still better soudn then stock get CAI
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13 |
thanks for info!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,744
CF Connoisseur 2004 Toyota Celica
|
CF Connoisseur
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,744 |
so which are you going to get?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 254
Member 2004 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 254 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13 |
so which are you going to get? in my country the rain is very bastard i must get SRI in alternative i can get the CDA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977
Furi Kuri 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Furi Kuri
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,977 |
AEM does not make an SRI for the Celica. You have a choice of Injen, RMM, Blitz, or K&N for an SRI
I've mastered the art of the After Image Technique.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 168
Member 1997 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
1997 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 168 |
Get the CAI, you won't hydrolock your car unless it is in like 1 foot of water where the filter is completely submerged in the water. Like the other person said, you have to be in a lake for it to happen. And you shoudn't be driving your celica in a lake. A little mist or drops of water here and there won't hydrolock your car. And if you want to be SAFE, then by an AEM bypass vavle to stop the water. Its only like 40-60 dollars. CAI is always better than SRI looks and performance IMO. My .02 cents.
Last edited by hs2g; Mar 9, 2005 10:44am.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,296
Specialist 2001 Toyota Celica GT
|
Specialist
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,296 |
AEM does not make an SRI for the Celica. You have a choice of Injen, RMM, Blitz, or K&N for an SRI
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 233
Member 2004 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 233 |
Get the CAI, you won't hydrolock your car unless it is in like 1 foot of water where the filter is completely submerged in the water. Like the other person said, you have to be in a lake for it to happen. And you shoudn't be driving your celica in a lake. A little mist or drops of water here and there won't hydrolock your car. And if you want to be SAFE, then by an AEM bypass vavle to stop the water. Its only like 40-60 dollars. And if you want to be SAFE, then by an AEM bypass vavle to stop the water. Its only like 40-60 dollars. CAI is always better than SRI looks and performance IMO. My .02 cents. somebody correct me if im wrong but doesnt the bypass valve basically negate the extra gains over an SRI...thats what i heard so dude your in italy with the rain (im coming this summer for my 1st time ) so just go SRI with a heatsheild
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 304
Member 2002 Volkswagon Jetta GLS
|
Member
2002 Volkswagon Jetta GLS
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 304 |
The aem by pass valve does not work very well with cold air intakes on celica's because the pipe is not long enough..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 348
Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 348 |
Get the CAI, you won't hydrolock your car unless it is in like 1 foot of water where the filter is completely submerged in the water. Like the other person said, you have to be in a lake for it to happen. And you shoudn't be driving your celica in a lake. A little mist or drops of water here and there won't hydrolock your car. And if you want to be SAFE, then by an AEM bypass vavle to stop the water. Its only like 40-60 dollars. CAI is always better than SRI looks and performance IMO. My .02 cents. I hyrdolocked my car with a CAI but yeah I was in about a foot of water. I didnt know it was a foot deep untill the front end went down and no I didnt drive in it on pourpose. Id rather have more go then show. so get a cai and dont drive in puddles
cant say ive done that before... ahh crap
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 399
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 399 |
lucky hydrolocked his and i don't believe it was a foot of water either.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 476 |
why not get both a SRI and CAI?
TPR Intake! - Injens high end with AEM's low end and NO BOGGING! TPR EXHAUST! - Exhaust made 10.5 whp peak and 32 whp at 6300 on my car!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 130
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 130 |
why not get both a SRI and CAI? TPR CAI/SRI are the best out.. or so i've heard
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 132
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 132 |
If you get the Injen don't waste time on the heat shield cause it don't fit right, you'll have to modify it just to get the hood to not close on it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 555
Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 555 |
~* Brotherhood Of Eternal Sleep *~ - Nocturnal Supremacy -
|
|
|
Joined: August 2004
Thank you.: me, myself, and I...! Random: a bowl of rice, fried chicken, and a glass of water!
|
Show All Member Profiles
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|