|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 313
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 313 |
Hey guys, there are 2 cars that i really like and not sure which to get if i actually sell my celi. Fisrt BMW 95-98 M3 manual and the other Honda 01-03 S2000. What do you guys think i should go with after considering the goods and bads of each car?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1 |
i say s2k. theyre more reliabie. by saying that i mean if anything happens to the m3, damage is gonna cost you more. plus s2k is gonna be having less miles i assume from being newer. ive driven an s2k so i can tell is one hell of a fun car to drive. the styling of the s2k is better and fresher than the old m3 body.
but one thing matters, go test drive both of them and see it urself.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 427
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 427 |
Depends what the cars gonna be used for and if you the only one that's gonna be driving it. If it's gonna be a daily driver I suggest the M3, since it does have 4 seats and a fairly large trunk. If it's just for fun on the weekends, then the S2K!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 313
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 313 |
well the m3 i'm gonna get withh be a coupe and yes it would most likley would be daily driver at least in the beginning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 205
Member 2001 Toyota & Acura Celica GTS
|
Member
2001 Toyota & Acura Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 205 |
get the m3 coupe, the inline 6 240hp way more torque than the s2000, definitely more of a man's car! id say m3 all the way! c'mon there's no comparison!
Last edited by flyimages; Mar 22, 2005 12:26pm.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 945
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 945 |
M3
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973
hookah-meister 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
hookah-meister
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 973 |
M3. The S2K looks like a fish, like the 03+ Celicas.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 427
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 427 |
I would get the bimmer! Gotta pick a BMW over a Honda... not to mention a M3!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 161
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 161 |
surf...nothing else matters tearing up costa rica summer 05'
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,093
Black Sheep 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Black Sheep
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,093 |
BMW = great resale value, when your done with the car.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,744
CF Connoisseur 2004 Toyota Celica
|
CF Connoisseur
2004 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,744 |
m3, and if you are goign to sell ur celi's rear give me a ring
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 241
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 241 |
m3. you get power , luxary and prestige. when a grl ask wat kinda car you driving, shes gonna be more interested when you say bmw instead of honda.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 230
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 230 |
M3! Come on its BMW... and thats Honda...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 168
Member 1997 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
1997 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 168 |
m3. you get power , luxary and prestige. when a grl ask wat kinda car you driving, shes gonna be more interested when you say bmw instead of honda. I think that most girls would be getting exciting if you mention an S2000 after the Honda. The BMW is nice and luxurious, but I have to go with the S2k. Sportier, faster (low 14 high 13 car), BMW is what mid-high 14's? Plus the 98 models are like a box. S2k WAY SEXIER.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 618
Senior Member 2001 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 618 |
^^Don't bet on it. The times they run are roughly the same. And we're talking E36 M3 as opposed to the E46. I'd go M3. Coupe is more practical too. The blue/white propeller is a helluva lot more prestigious than that goddam H. BMW presents an image of a more mature/professional man, while the S2K screams "boy racer"
Enzo Ferrari " You may be a Ferrari owner; but, you may not necessarly be a Ferrari Driver."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 168
Member 1997 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
1997 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 168 |
I see where your going the BMW itself says mature/professinal and only by itself compared to the S2K, but if you step out of either cars in a $200 suit, the newer fresher, sportier look of the S2K would look more high class. Yes the BMW has its reputation and if it was the newer model M3 then yes the M3 is the way to go, but its not. The older models are like a box, no curves or style (on the cosmetic side), just plain flat 4 sides.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 262
Member 1993 Toyota Celica Alltrac
|
Member
1993 Toyota Celica Alltrac
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 262 |
Hmmm... tough choice! I wouldn't buy an E36 just because of luxurious or BMW brand, but because of it's engine, suspension and handling. But S2k engine is also an extra ordinary engine and it's drop top. Hmmmmm... But it got no torque. So, E36 for me all the way.
93 ST185, 91 ST185 (sold), 99 Solara SEV6 Boston
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 618
Senior Member 2001 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 618 |
I see where your going the BMW itself says mature/professinal and only by itself compared to the S2K, but if you step out of either cars in a $200 suit, the newer fresher, sportier look of the S2K would look more high class. Yes the BMW has its reputation and if it was the newer model M3 then yes the M3 is the way to go, but its not. The older models are like a box, no curves or style (on the cosmetic side), just plain flat 4 sides. Don't forget, it's also a case of personal preference/taste
Enzo Ferrari " You may be a Ferrari owner; but, you may not necessarly be a Ferrari Driver."
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,971
Boobie Vision 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Boobie Vision
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,971 |
damn also depends on how it's presented to you. like it all comes down with the price and what you feel that day. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,337 |
respect the gt-s
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1
Specialist 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864 Likes: 1 |
i also think the styling of the s2k is better than the old body m3.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 211
Member 2001 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2001 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 211 |
well motor trend has the s2ooo in third place in overall performance, the only cars that beat it was the porsch 911 and the corvette zo6, for fun driving i say the S2k, but for daily driving get the BMW!! good luck in making your decesion bud!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 242
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 242 |
M3. German engineering can't be beat.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 427
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 427 |
M3. German engineering can't be beat. How true how true!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8
New Member 2001 Toyota Celica
|
New Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8 |
BMW > Honda
You're like comparing Jessica Alba to a...contestant from "The Swan"! But since it's a S2k you speak of, I guess it'd be the contestant after all the plastic surgery and shit, but still ugly (Honda) on the inside.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 239
Member 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 239 |
old beamer is kinda played out already. i would probably go with the s2k. as people said, its a lot fresher in the styling department. Plus the current m3 is gonna stop production because theyre commin out with a new body soon, so the e36 is gonna be a few bodies old. go with the s2k, ull have more fun with it
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 205
Member 2001 Toyota & Acura Celica GTS
|
Member
2001 Toyota & Acura Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 205 |
old beamer is kinda played out already. i would probably go with the s2k. as people said, its a lot fresher in the styling department. Plus the current m3 is gonna stop production because theyre commin out with a new body soon, so the e36 is gonna be a few bodies old. go with the s2k, ull have more fun with it yea, the m3 you don't see too much around like the s2k. the m3 will outperform the s2k!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 618
Senior Member 2001 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 618 |
old beamer is kinda played out already. i would probably go with the s2k. as people said, its a lot fresher in the styling department. Plus the current m3 is gonna stop production because theyre commin out with a new body soon, so the e36 is gonna be a few bodies old. go with the s2k, ull have more fun with it 1. Bimmer, not beamer. Beamer is like a vespe. Common mistake. 2. Current M3 is E46, not E36. New body will NOT be the E56(as much as it makes sense) but the E90. Powered by essentially the M5 V10 minus two cylinders. 3. Owning a BMW will always be more expensive than owning a Honda. Either way, you're guarenteed thrills.
Enzo Ferrari " You may be a Ferrari owner; but, you may not necessarly be a Ferrari Driver."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,353
Playboy 2001 Acura Integra
|
Playboy
2001 Acura Integra
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,353 |
Definitely S2000.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 50
Member 2001 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 50 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 55
Member 2000 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 55 |
M3 THAT SHOULD BE NO COMPETITION. HONDA'S SUCK, AND BMW ARE PIZZZIMP.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 409
Senior Member 2002 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 409 |
bmw cost out of the ass for aftermarket parts get the s2k its a phatter car
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 24
Member 2002 Toyota Celica GTS
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 24 |
M3 for sure. I have owned an M3 and driven an s2000 and the M3 is in a different league. The M3 is more comfortable, much faster (well at least euro spec ones which have 321hp!), nicer to drive, engine sounds much better and it has more prestige despite its age.
S2000 generation 1 is a tricky car to drive fast, not sure if 2001 is still the gen 1 version, generation 2 are fine, in fact good but I am only aware about European versions, American ones could be different.
If you are seriously looking at Honda why not look at the Integra Type R. There's a reason numerous car magazines have voted it the best handaling front wheel drive car of all time!
Comparing the M3 and the S2000 is like comparing apples to oranges. Both have there place and what you do in it will decide which is the better one.
S2000 is not that much cheaper to look after than the M3. This old stereotype that BMW's are expensive to look after is false these days. My VW cost the same to service as my Bmw. However when certain things go wrong on the M such as the exhaust (back box), it is serious money. The M3 isn't as reliable as the s2000 but it is a hell of a lot more fun. Whats more, you can carry friends, shopping etc whilst still looking stylish.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 479 |
yeah that is a hard choice but i think the m3 is more practial and can be just as fun. not to mention i think they can out perform an s2k. its really a win win situation though, but if you do get a s2k spend the extra 2 gs and get a hard top
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 618
Senior Member 2001 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 618 |
snipe12, current US spec M3 has 333 hp.
Enzo Ferrari " You may be a Ferrari owner; but, you may not necessarly be a Ferrari Driver."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 24
Member 2002 Toyota Celica GTS
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 24 |
snipe12, current US spec M3 has 333 hp. Thanks, I am aware of that. I was talking about e36 M3. America got a seriously watered down version of the M3. A lot of people (obviously not America M3 owners) say the version America was given wasn't really an M3 compared to the rest of the world, just a souped up 328 with an M badge. Europe's version of the latest M3 has 343bhp I believe so not sure where the 10hp goes on the American version, probably the crap petrol as even our standard stuff is better than your premium although we do pay serious money for each gallon or maybe emission regulations. What is the octain rating for standard fuel and premium in RON, low 90's isn't it? Here in the UK our standard fuel is 95 and the premium is 97/98 so you can imagine what a difference that makes.
Last edited by snipe12; Mar 27, 2005 5:49am.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 538
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 538 |
Damn, you guys do have some octane over there, maybe that's how Tiff got so much grunt out of a Civic SI !!! (Mr. Needell)
"I will be merciful.........and quick!"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 42
Member 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 42 |
s2k!!! its faster ive drove both
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 313
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 313 |
I do agree with most of you guys and had the same thoughts and concerns. The biggest thing i do not like about the s2k is the low torque, and the biggest thing i do not like about the 99 M3 is the boxie look even tho i still think it looks good. Thx again for all your posts, what do you guys think about bringing a 350z into the picture?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 407
Senior Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 407 |
M3's are rarer than s2000 but honestly the M3 is more well known and looked upon by society as a better, more high-class car. When i see a s2000 I look at it, then focus back on driving. When I see an M3 I'm trying to catch up to it too either get a closer look or get it to own me.
high class girls dig the M3...
To deny the simple pleasures in life is to desire death in the most horrifing way.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1
New Member 2001 Toyota Celica Sx
|
New Member
2001 Toyota Celica Sx
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1 |
JUST BUY BOTH OF THEM...IT WILL SAVE U TIME ) GOOD LUCK
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 159
Member 2002 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2002 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 159 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 228
Member 2004 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2004 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 228 |
S2000 is a sick car but its also a hair-dresser's car M3-germans are the shit they know how to build cars.
The dream of someday racing in the JGTC... drive sideways. -'nough said.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 239
Member 2003 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2003 Toyota Celica
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 239 |
old beamer is kinda played out already. i would probably go with the s2k. as people said, its a lot fresher in the styling department. Plus the current m3 is gonna stop production because theyre commin out with a new body soon, so the e36 is gonna be a few bodies old. go with the s2k, ull have more fun with it 1. Bimmer, not beamer. Beamer is like a vespe. Common mistake. 2. Current M3 is E46, not E36. New body will NOT be the E56(as much as it makes sense) but the E90. Powered by essentially the M5 V10 minus two cylinders. 3. Owning a BMW will always be more expensive than owning a Honda. Either way, you're guarenteed thrills. 1.??? 2.i know current is E46, and old is E36. The guy was saying that he was cosidering E36, so i was just commenting how since the current m3 is gonna go out of production soon, the E36 will seem even older than what it is now 3. I totally agree
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 398
Member 2004 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2004 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 398 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 228
Member 2004 Toyota Celica GT
|
Member
2004 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 228 |
playing with search i c...
The dream of someday racing in the JGTC... drive sideways. -'nough said.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 218
Member 2000 Toyota Celica
|
Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 218 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 706
Sideways 2003 Toyota Celica GTS
|
Sideways
2003 Toyota Celica GTS
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 706 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 405
Senior Member 2001 Toyota Celica
|
Senior Member
2001 Toyota Celica
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 405 |
M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! M3! [/color]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 419
Senior Member 2003 Toyota Celica GT
|
Senior Member
2003 Toyota Celica GT
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 419 |
S2K, easier and far more mods
|
|
|
- Part Reviews
- OEM Parts Catalog
- Body Kits, Ground Effects
- Hoods, Hood Scoops
- Spoilers, Wings, Splitters
- Side Mirrors
- Head/Tail Lights & Bulbs
- Interior Appearance
- Interior Performance
- Engine Dress-up Kits
- Exhaust Systems
- Engine Performance
- Bars, Braces, Coilovers
- Shocks, Springs
- Wheels, Tires, Brakes
- Audio, Video, Security
|
|
|
|